Positioning intercultural dialogue -theories, pragmatics, and an agenda

Journal of International and Intercultural Communication

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 81-86

  Ganesh, Shiv ^a   Holmes, Prue ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957616455     PISSN: 17513057     EISSN: 17513065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2011.557482     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Byram, M. (2009). Intercultural competence in foreign language education. In D. Deardorff (Ed.), The Sage handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 321-332). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Carbaugh, D., Boromisza-Habashi, D., & Ge, X. (2006). Dialogue in cross-cultural perspective. In N. Aalto & E. Reuter (Eds.), Aspects of intercultural dialogue (pp. 27-46). Koln: SAXA Verlag.
3. Collier, M.J., Hegde, R.S., Lee, W., Nakayama, T.K., & Yep, G.A. (2002). Dialogue on the edges: Ferment in communication and culture. In M.J. Collier (Ed.), Transforming communication about culture: Critical new directions (pp. 219-280). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Council of Europe. (2008). White paper on intercultural dialogue: "Living together as equals in dignity." Retrieved from www.coe.int/dialogue
5. Deetz, S., & Simpson, J. (2004). Critical organizational dialogue. Open formation and the demand of "otherness". In R. Anderson, L. Baxter, & K.N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue. Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 141-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed., J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall, Trans.) New York, NY: Crossroads.
7. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Life world and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
8. Kersten, A. (2005). The struggle for dialogue. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 361-364.
9. Mortenson, S.T., Burleson, B.R., Feng, B., & Liu, M. (2009). Cultural similarities and differences in seeking social support as a means of coping: A comparison of European Americans and Chinese and an evaluation of the mediating effects of self-construal. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2(3), 208-239.
10. Nass, H.E. (2010). The ambiguities of intercultural dialogue: Critical perspectives on the European Union's new agenda for culture. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23. Retrieved from http://immi.se/intercultural.
11. Oetzel, J., Dhar, S., & Kirschbaum, K. (2007). Intercultural conflict from a multilevel perspective: Trends, possibilities, and future directions. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 183-204.
12. Orbe, M.P. (1998). Constructing co-cultural theory: An explication of culture, power, and communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Philipsen, G. (1992). Speaking culturally: Explorations in social communication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14. Rawlins, W.K. (2009). The compass of friendship. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
15. Schneider, J., & von der Emde, S. (2006). Conflicts in cyberspace: From communication breakdown to intercultural dialogue in online collaborations. In J.A. Belz & S.L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 178-206). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
16. Squires, C.R. (2002). Rethinking the Black public sphere: An alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory, 12(4), 446-468.
17. Warren, J. (2008). Performing difference: Repetition in context. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 1(4), 290-308.