Comparison of oncological results, functional outcomes, and complications for transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon's experience

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 787-792

  Chung, Jae Seung ^a   Kim, Won Tae ^b   Ham, Won Sik ^c   Yu, Ho Song ^c   Chae, Yunbyung ^c   Chung, Seok Hyun ^c   Choi, Young Deuk ^c  

^a Inje University   (South Korea)

^b Chungbuk National University   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MORPHINE; PARACETAMOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRAPERITONEAL ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HERNIA; HUMAN; ILEUS; INCONTINENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPHADENECTOMY; LYMPHOCELE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PENIS ERECTION; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RECTUM INJURY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PATIENT; TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; HUMANS; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79957607722     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0222     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50:854-857. (Pubitemid 28021100)
2. Wolfram M, Bräutigam R, Engl T, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Frankfurt technique. World J Urol 2003;21:128-132. (Pubitemid 44175263)
3. Esposito MP, Ilbeigi P, Ahmed M, et al. Use of fourth arm in da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy: novel technique. Urology 2005;66:649-652. (Pubitemid 41242341)
4. Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, et al. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 2006;175:945-950.
5. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J; VIP Team. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 2003;169:2289-2292. (Pubitemid 36576774)
6. Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, et al. Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002; 60:569-572. (Pubitemid 35246433)
7. Capello SA, Boczko J, Patel HR, et al. Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2007;21: 1199-1202. (Pubitemid 47614370)
8. Madi R, Daignault S, Wood DP. Extraperitoneal v intraperitoneal robotic prostatectomy: analysis of operative outcomes. J Endourol 2007;21:1553-1557.
9. Gettman MT, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol 2003;170: 416-419. (Pubitemid 36870214)
10. Won Sik Ham, Sung Yul Park, Koon Ho Rha, et al. Comparison of open versus robotic radical prostatectomy in clinically advanced prostate cancer. Korean J Urol 2008;49: 886-892.
11. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, et al. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999;11: 319-326. (Pubitemid 30052683)
12. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, et al. ICIQ: A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23:322-330. (Pubitemid 38859423)
13. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001;87:408-410. (Pubitemid 32240857)
14. Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M, et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Is one better than the other? Urology 2006;68:1077-1081. (Pubitemid 44750160)
15. Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, et al. Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:617-622. (Pubitemid 36294202)
16. Ruiz L, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Comparison of early oncologic results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach. Eur Urol 2004;46:50-54.
17. van Velthoven RF. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach: is there an advantage for the patient? Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:83-88. (Pubitemid 40388263)
18. Poulakis V, Ferakis N, Dillenburg W, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using an extraperitoneal approach: Nordwest hospital technique and initial experience in 255 cases. J Endourol 2006;20:45-53. (Pubitemid 43201620)
19. Goeman L, Salomon L, La De Taille A, et al. Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients. World J Urol 2006;24:281-288. (Pubitemid 44138183)
20. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases. World J Urol 2007;25:45-51.