The effect of annealing on the variation of glass refractive index

Forensic Science International

Volumn 209, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 102-107

  Rushton, K P ^a   Coulson, S A ^a   Newton, A W N ^a   Curran, J M ^b  

^a MT ALBERT RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Bayesian modelling; Delta RI; Discrimination; Refractive index; Statistics

Indexed keywords

GLASS;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BUILDING MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; FLOAT WINDOW GLASS; FORENSIC SCIENCE; GLASS ANNEALING; GLASS REFRACTIVE INDEX; INDUSTRY AND INDUSTRIAL PHENOMENA; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REFRACTION INDEX; TOUGHENED FLOAT GLASS PANE;

EID: 79957593106     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: 18726283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Curran J.M., Hicks T.N., Buckleton J.S. Forensic Interpretation of Glass Evidence 2000, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
2. Locke J., Hayes C.A. Refractive index variations across glass objects and the influence of annealing. Forensic Science International 1984, 26:147-157.
3. Newton A.W.N., Kitto L., Buckleton J.S. A study of the performance and utility of annealing in forensic glass analysis. Forensic Science International 2005, 155:119-125.
4. Winstanley R., Rydeard C. Concepts of annealing applied to small glass fragments. Forensic Science International 1985, 29:1-10.
5. Caddy B. Forensic Examination of Glass and Paint: Analysis and Interpretation 2001, Taylor & Francis, New York.
6. Locke J., Rockett L.A. The application of annealing to improve the discrimination between glasses. Forensic Science International 1985, 29:237-245.
7. Locke J., Sanger D.G., Roopnarine G. The identification of toughened glass by annealing. Forensic Science International 1982, 20:295-301.
8. Underhill M. The annealing of glass. Notes for Caseworkers 1992, Metropolitan Police Forensic Science Laboratory, London.
9. Cassista A.R., Sandercock P.M.L. Effects of annealing on toughened and non-toughened glass. Journal of the Canadian Society of Forensic Science 1994, 27:171-177.
10. Marcouiller J.M. A revised glass annealing method to distinguish glass types. Journal of Forensic Sciences 1990, 35:554-559.
11. Bennett R.L., Curran J.M., Kim N.D., Coulson S.A., Newton A.N. Spatial variation of refractive index in a pane of glass. Science and Justice 2003, 43:71-76.
12. Pawluk-Kolc M., Zigba-Palus J., Parczewski A. The effect of re-annealing on the distribution of refractive index in a windscreen and a windowpane classification of glass samples. Forensic Science International 2008, 174:222-228.
13. Phillips D., Hockman E., Beckwith I. Container glass refractive index range, and variation with annealing. 20th International Symposium on the Forensic Sciences (ANZFSS) 2010.
14. Locke J., Hayes C.A., Sanger D.G. The design of equipment and thermal routines for annealing glass particles. Forensic Science International 1984, 26:139-146.
15. Locke J., Scranage J.K. Breaking of flat glass. Part 3: Surface particles from windows. Forensic Science International 1992, 57:73-80.
16. Zoro J.A., Locke J., Day R.S., Bademus O., Perryman A.C. An investigation of refractive index anomalies at the surfaces of glass objects and windows. Forensic Science International 1988, 39:127-141.
17. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 2.11.1 2010, http://www.r-project.org/.
18. Thomas A., O'Hara B., Ligges U., Sturtz S. Making BUGS open. R News 2006, 6:12-17.