Applicability assessment of Semantic Web technologies

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 507-517

  Janev, Valentina ^a   Vraneš, Sanja ^a  

^a MIHAJLO PUPIN INSTITUTE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Adoption; Applicability; Applications; Assessment; Industry; Semantic Web technologies; W3C

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; APPLICABILITY; ASSESSMENT; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES; W3C;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; RATING; RESEARCH; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 79957591908     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2010.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. M.N. Ahmad, and R.M. Colomb Overview of ontology servers research Webology 4 2 2007
2. A. Ahmed Structured literature image finder: Parsing text and figures in biomedical literature Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 8 2-3 2010 151 154
3. H. Alani Building a pragmatic semantic web IEEE Intelligent Systems 2008 May/June 2008 61 68 (Pubitemid 351751947)
4. Andrews, W. (2009). Magic Quadrant for Information Access Technology (2009). Gartner RAS Core Research Note G00169927 from September 2, 2009. Gartner, Inc. < http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ microsoft/vol7/article2/article2.html > Retrieved 15.09.10.
5. S. Auer Methods and applications of the social Semantic Web S. Vraneš, Semantic Web and/or Web 2.0: Competitive or complementary? 2008 Academic Mind Belgrade, Serbia 100 128
6. Auer, S.; Lehmann, J.; & Hellmann, S. (2009). LinkedGeoData: Adding a spatial dimension to the web of data. In Proceedings of the international Semantic Web conference 2009 (pp. 731-746).
7. Auer, S.; Dietzold, S.; Lehmann, J.; & Hellmann, S.; Aumueller, D. (2009). Triplify: Light-weight linked data publication from relational databases. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 621-630).
8. Barbieri, D.; Braga, D.; Ceri, S.; Della Valle, E.; & Grossniklaus, M. (2010). Stream reasoning: Where we got so far. In S. Ceri, E. Della Valle, J. Hendler, & Z. Huang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th workshop on new forms of reasoning for the Semantic Web: Scalable & dynamic (pp. 1-7). < http://www.nefors10.larkc.eu/ >.
9. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American. < http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-semantic-web >.
10. Bhagdev, R.; Chapman, S.; Ciravegna, F.; Lanfranchi, V.; & Petrelli, D. (2008). Hybrid search: Effectively combining keywords and semantic searches. In European Semantic Web Conference - ESWC 2008, Tenerife, Spain.
11. Bizer, C.; & Cyganiak, R. (2006). D2R server - Publishing relational databases on the Semantic Web (Poster). Poster at the 5th international Semantic Web conference, Athens, USA, November 2006.
12. C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee Linked data - The story so far International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5 3 2009 1 22
13. E. Braun Technology in context: Technology assessment for managers (p. 23) 1998 Routledge London
14. Cali, A.; et al. (2005). State of the art survey. TONES. D.01. FP6-7603 Thinking OntolgiES.
15. J. Cardoso The Semantic Web vision: Where are we? IEEE Intelligent Systems September/October 2007 22 26
16. Correndo, G.; & Alani, H. (2007). Survey of tools for collaborative knowledge construction and sharing. In Workshop on collective intelligence on Semantic Web (CISW 2007), 2-5 November 2007, Fremont, CA, USA.
17. F. Crestani, M. Lalmas, C.J. Van Rijsbergen, and I. Campbell Is this document relevant? Probably: A survey of probabilistic models in information retrieval ACM Computing Surveys 30 4 1998 528 552
18. Cuel, R.; Delteil, A.; Louis, V.; & Rizzi, C. (2007). The technology roadmap of the Semantic Web. KnowledgeWeb White Paper. FP6-507482. < http://www.knowledgeweb.semanticweb.org/o2i/menu/KWTR-whitepaper-43-final.pdf > Retrieved 22.10.09.
19. M. d'Aquin Toward a new generation of Semantic Web applications IEEE Intelligent Systems 23 3 2008 20 28 (Pubitemid 351751943)
20. Davis, M.; Allemang, D.; & Coyne, R. (2004). Evaluation and market report. IST Project 2001-33052 WonderWeb: Ontology infrastructure for the Semantic Web.
21. Dean, J.; & Ghemawat, S. (2010). System and method for efficient large-scale data processing. United States Patent 7,650,331.
22. A. Doms, and M. Schroeder GoPubMed: Exploring PubMed with the GeneOntology Nucleic Acid Research 33 Web Server Issue 2005 W783 W786
23. European Commission (2009). Europe's digital competitiveness report - Main achievements of the i2010 strategy 2005-2009. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, COM (2009) 390 from 4.8.2009.
24. Fantini, P.; et al. (2007). Semantic business process life cycle. SUPER D2.2 IST Project-026850. < http://www.ip-super.org/res/Deliverables/M12/D2.2. pdf > Retrieved 22.10.09.
25. Fischer, F.; Unel, G.; Bishop, B.; & Fensel, D. (2010). Towards a scalable, pragmatic knowledge representation language for the Web. In A. Pnueli, I. Virbitskaite, & A. Voronkov (Eds.), Perspectives of systems informatics. Lecture notes in computer science, 5947, 124-134.
26. Gómez-Pérez, A.; & Manzano-Macho, M. (2003). A survey of ontology learning methods and techniques. OntoWeb D.1.5. IST Project IST-2000-29243.
27. Gootzit, D.; Phifer, G.; Valdes, R.; & Knipp, E. (2009). Magic quadrant for horizontal portal products. Gartner RAS core research note G00170709 from September 17, 2009. Gartner, Inc. < http://www.gartner.com/ technology/media-products/reprints/microsoft/vol10/article2/article2.html > Retrieved 15.09.10.
28. Haslhofe, B.; Momen, E.; Gay, M.; & Simon, R. (2010). Augmenting Europeana content with linked data resources. In A. Paschke, N. Henze, T. Pellegrini (Eds.), Proceedings of I-SEMANTICS 2010. ACM international conference proceedings series.
29. V. Janev A comparison and critical assessment of cutting edge Semantic Web products and technologies S. Vraneš, Semantic Web and/or Web 2.0: Competitive or complementary? 2008 Academic Mind Belgrade, Serbia 148 165
30. Kaufmann, E.; (2009). Talking to the Semantic Web: Natural language query interfaces for casual end-users. PhD Thesis at the Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Information Technology of the University of Zurich. < http://www.ifi.uzh.ch/pax/uploads/pdf/publication/1384/Kaufmann-2007.pdf > Retrieved 18.11.10.
31. Linden, A.; & Fenn, J. (2003). Understanding Gartner's hype cycles. Gartner research R-20-1971. Gartner, Inc. < www.paulohenrique.com-a. googlepages.com/3606402-gg-understanding-gartners-hy.pdf > Retrieved 15.09.10.
32. C. Mangold A survey and classification of semantic search approaches International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontology 2 1 2007 23 31
33. Manzano-Macho, D.; Gómez-Pérez, A.; & Borrajoy, D. (2008). Unsupervised and domain independent ontology learning. Combining heterogeneous sources of evidence. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC'08). Marrakech.
34. Mendes, P. N.; Passant, A.; & Kapanipathi, P. (2010). Twarql: Tapping into the wisdom of the crowd. In A. Paschke, N. Henze, T. Pellegrini (Eds.), Proceedings of I-SEMANTICS 2010. ACM international conference proceedings series.
35. Pellegrini Semantic Web awareness barometer 2009 - Comparing research- and application-oriented approaches to social software and the Semantic Web A. Paschke, H. Weigand, W. Behrendt, K. Tochtermann, T. Pellegrini, Proceedings of I-KNOW '09 and I-SEMANTICS '09 2009 J.UCS Graz, Austria
36. Pohjola, P. (2010). The pragmatic web: Some key issues. In A. Paschke, N. Henze, T. Pellegrini (Eds.), Proceedings of I-SEMANTICS 2010. ACM international conference proceedings series.
37. Provost, D. (2008). On the cusp: A global review of the Semantic Web industry. < http://www.scribd.com/doc/6379635/Semantic-Web-Industry-Review- sept2008 > Retrieved 22.10.09.
38. Reeve, L.; & Han, H. (2005). Survey of semantic annotation platforms. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on applied computing, web technologies and applications track, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
39. N. Shadbolt, T. Berners-Lee, and W. Hall The Semantic Web revisited IEEE Intelligent Systems 21 3 2006 96 101 (Pubitemid 44144116)
40. A. Sheth, and C. Ramakrishnan Semantic (Web) technology in action: Ontology driven information systems for search, integration and analysis IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, Special Issue on Making the Semantic Web Real December 2003 40 48
41. K. Siorpaes, and E. Simperl Human intelligence in the process of semantic content creation World Wide Web WWW Journal 13 1 2010 33 59