Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 702-708

  Torkildsen, E A ^a   Salvesen, K A ^b   Eggebao T M ^a  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

angle of progression; fetal head perineum distance; intrapartum ultrasound; labor; primiparous; station; three dimensional ultrasound; two dimensional ultrasound; ultrasound; vaginal delivery

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LABOR; METHODOLOGY; PERINEUM; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; UTERINE CERVIX;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVIX UTERI; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMANS; LABOR PRESENTATION; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PERINEUM; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957591857     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.8951     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Menacker F, Hamilton BE,. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief, 2010; [Accessed 13 September 2010].
2. Rossen J, Okland I, Nilsen OB, Eggebo TM,. Is there an increase of postpartum hemorrhage, and is severe hemorrhage associated with more frequent use of obstetric interventions? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 1248-1255.
3. Kolà¥s, T, Hofoss D, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Henriksen T, Häger R, Ingemarsson I, àian P,. Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 864-870. (Pubitemid 36530030)
4. Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL,. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 589-595. (Pubitemid 30139582)
5. Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Uotila J, Raudaskoski T, Ulander VM, Hurme S,. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89: 896-902.
6. Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR,. Station of the fetal presenting part. I. Pattern of descent. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 93: 522-529.
7. Philpott RH,. Graphic records in labour. Br Med J 1972; 4: 163-165.
8. World Health Organization. Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors. WHO/RHR/007. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Geneva: 2003; [Accessed 9 September 2010].
9. Buchmann E, Libhaber E,. Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 101: 285-289.
10. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, Redarce T, Rudigoz RC,. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 868-874. (Pubitemid 40311282)
11. Eggebo TM, Okland I, Heien C, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA,. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 325-331.
12. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V, Simpson JM,. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 409-415. (Pubitemid 43735480)
13. Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kamena A, Tutschek B,. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 753-760. (Pubitemid 44787458)
14. Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC,. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 313-319.
15. Duckelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Nonnenmacher A, Dudenhausen JW, Kalache KD,. Measurement of fetal head descent using the 'angle of progression' on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 216-222.
16. Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Okland I, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA,. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 387-391. (Pubitemid 43735477)
17. Eggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA,. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 199-204.
18. Kalache KD, Duckelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW,. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 326-330.
19. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Howard R, Osei E, Nicolaides KH,. Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 425-428. (Pubitemid 39179479)
20. Eggebo TM, Salvesen KA,. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 128-129.
21. Bergsjo P, Koss KS,. Interindividual variation in vaginal examination findings during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 509-510. (Pubitemid 13194734)
22. Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR,. Station of the fetal presenting part. VI. Arrest of descent in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 47: 129-136.
23. Lewin D, Sadoul G, Beuret T,. Measuring the height of a cephalic presentation: an objective assessment of station. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1977; 7: 369-372. (Pubitemid 8258244)
24. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V,. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 165-168. (Pubitemid 40299025)
25. Barbera AF, Imani F, Becker T, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC,. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 320-325.
26. Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G,. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 331-336.
27. Molina FS, Terra R, Carrillo MP, Puertas A, Nicolaides KH,. What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 493-499.
28. Ghi T, Contro E, Farina A, Nobile M, Pilu G,. Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring the progression of labor: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 500-506.
29. Molina FS, Nicolaides KH,. Ultrasound in labor and delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 61-67.
30. Maticot-Baptista D, Ramanah R, Collin A, Martin A, Maillet R, Riethmuller D,. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2009; 38: 474-480.
31. Zimerman AL, Smolin A, Maymon R, Weinraub Z, Herman A, Tobvin Y,. Intrapartum measurement of cervical dilatation using translabial 3-dimensional ultrasonography: correlation with digital examination and interobserver and intraobserver agreement assessment. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 1289-1296.