Time and number of displays impact critical signal detection in fetal heart rate tracings

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 435-441

  Anderson, Brittany L ^a   Scerbo, Mark W ^a   Belfore, Lee A ^b   Abuhamad, Alfred Z ^c  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ^*  (United States)

^c EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Fetal heart rate; multiple displays; signal detection; stress; workload

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FETUS ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; LABOR; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESPONSE TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION; STRESS; TIME; UTERUS CONTRACTION; WORKLOAD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; MALE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; WORKLOAD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957575675     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268718     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Freeman R K. Problems with intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation and patient management. Obstet Gynecol 2002 100 813-826 (Pubitemid 35300043)
2. Menihan C A., Zottoli E K. Electronic Fetal Monitoring: Concepts and Applications. Philadelphia Lippincott 2001
3. Macones G A., Hankins G DV, Spong C Y., Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008 112 661-666
4. Sweha A, Hacker T W., Nuovo J. Interpretation of the electronic fetal heart rate during labor. Am Fam Physician 1999 59 2487-2500 (Pubitemid 29226233)
5. Weiss P M., Balducci J, Reed J, Klasko S K., Rust O A. Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome? J Matern Fetal Med 1997 6 317-319
6. Withiam-Leitch M, Shelton J, Fleming E. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate. Birth 2006 33 284-288 (Pubitemid 44786319)
7. Davies D R., Parasuraman R. The Psychology of Vigilance. London Academic Press 1982
8. Warm J S. An introduction to vigilance. In: Warm J S. ed. Sustained Attention in Human Performance. New York John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1984 1-13
9. Temple J G., Warm J S., Dember W N., Jones K S., LaGrange C M., Matthews G. The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Hum Factors 2000 42 183-194
10. Mackworth N H. The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Q J Exp Psychol 1948 1 6-21
11. Buck L. Reaction time as a measure of perceptual vigilance. Psychol Bull 1966 65 291-304
12. Wiener E L. Vigilance and inspection. In: Warm J S. ed. Sustained Attention in Human Performance. New York John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1984 207-245
13. Weinger M B., Englund C E. Ergonomic and human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating room environment. Anesthesiology 1990 73 995-1021 (Pubitemid 20380947)
14. Johnston W A., Howell W C., Williges R C. The components of complex monitoring. Organ Behav Hum Perform 1969 4 112-124
15. Jerison H J. On the decrement function in human performance. In: Buckner D N. Mc Grath J J. eds. Vigilance: A Symposium. New York McGraw-Hill 1963 199-216
16. Wiener E L. Multiple channel monitoring. Ergonomics 1964 7 453-460
17. Grier R A., Warm J S., Dember W N., Matthews G, Galinsky T L., Parasuraman R. The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness. Hum Factors 2003 45 349-359 (Pubitemid 37509589)
18. Hancock P A., Warm J S. A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Hum Factors 1989 31 519-537 (Pubitemid 20115243)
19. Helton W S. Validation of a short stress state questionnaire. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2004 1238-1242
20. Szalma J L., Warm J S., Matthews G et al. Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention. Hum Factors 2004 46 219-233 (Pubitemid 44490379)
21. Warm J S. Vigilance and target detection. In: Huey B M. Wickens C D. eds. Workload Transition: Implications for Individual and Team Performance. Washington, DC National Academy Press 1993 139-170
22. Warm J S., Dember W N., Hancock P A. Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In: Parasuraman R Mouloua M eds. Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1996 183-200
23. Hart S G., Staveland L E. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock P A. Meshkati N eds. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1988 139-183