Using electronic medical records to determine the diagnosis of clinical depression

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 80, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 533-540

  Trinh, Nhi Ha T ^a   Youn, Soo Jeong ^a   Sousa, Jessica ^a   Regan, Susan ^a   Bedoya, C Andres ^a   Chang, Trina E ^a   Fava, Maurizio ^a   Yeung, Albert ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b South Cove Community Health Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical research methods; Depression; Electronic medical records

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DATA; CLINICAL DEPRESSION; CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DEPRESSION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMR SYSTEMS; HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS; MASSACHUSETTS; MENTAL HEALTH; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; PRIMARY CARE; PRIMARY CARE CLINICS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; RESPONSE RATE;

DIAGNOSIS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; RATING; SURVEYS;

DISEASES;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BILLING AND CLAIMS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEPRESSION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

DEPRESSION; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79957573906     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Seyfried L., Hanauer D.A., Nease D., Albeiruti R., Kavanagh J., Kales H.C. Enhanced identification of eligibility for depression research using an electronic medical record search engine. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78(December (12)):e13-e18.
2. Kramer T.L., Owen R.R., Cannon D., Sloan K.L., Thrush C.R., Williams D.K., Austen M.A. How well do automated performance measures assess guideline implementation for new-onset depression in the Veterans Health Administration?. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Saf. 2003, 29(9):479-489.
3. Hayrinen K., Saranto K., Nykanen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77:291-304.
4. Gill J.M., Chen Y.X., Lieberman M.I. Management of depression in ambulatory care for patients with medical co-morbidities: a study from a national electronic health record (EHR) network. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 2008, 38(2):203-215.
5. Folsom D.P., Lindamer L., Montross L.P., Hawthorne W., Golshan S., Hough R., Shale J., Jeste D.V. Diagnostic variability for schizophrenia and major depression in a large public mental health care system dataset. Psychiatry Res. 2006, 144(2):167-175.
6. Ornstein S., Stuart G., Jenkins R. Depression diagnoses and antidepressant use in primary care practices. J. Fam. Pract. 2000, 49(1):68-72.
7. Rost K., Smith R., Matthews D.B., Guise B. The deliberate misdiagnosis of major depression in primary care. Arch. Fam. Med. 1994, 3(April (4)):333-337.
8. Weber G.M., Murphy S.N., McMurry A.J., Macfadden D., Nigrin D.J., Churchill S., Kohane I.S. The shared health research information network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2009, 16(September-October (5)):624-630.
9. Nalichowski R., Keogh D., Chueh H.C., Murphy S.N. Calculating the benefits of a research patient data repository. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2006, 1044.
10. Altman D.G., Bland J.M. Diagnostic tests. 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ 1994, 308:1552.
11. Lasko T.A., Bhagwat J.G., Zou K.H., Ohno-Machado L. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. J. Biomed. Inform. 2005, 38(5):404-415.
12. Vining D.J., Gladish G.W. Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding. Radiographics 1992, 12:1147-1154.
13. Fischer J.E., Bachman L.M., Jaeschke R. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29:1043-1051.
14. StataCorp Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station 2008, Stata Corporation, TX.
15. Reid M.C., Lachs M.S., Feinstein A.R. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995, 274:645-651.
16. Mulherin S.A., Miller W.C. Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2002, 137:598-602.
17. Punglia R.S., D'Amico A.V., Catalona W.J., Roehl K.A., Kuntz K.M. Effect of verification bias on screening for prostate cancer by measurement of prostate-specific antigen. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349(4):335-342.
18. Kessler R.C., Berglund P., Demler O., Jin R., Koretz D., Merikangas K.R., Rush A.J., Walters E.E., Wang P.S. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003, 289(23):3095-3105.
19. Hasin D.S., Goodwin R.D., Stinson F.S., Grant B.F. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2005, 62(10):1097-1106.