An alternative perspective on injectivity of modules

Journal of Algebra

Volumn 338, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 207-219

  Aydoǧdu, Pinar ^a,b   López Permouth, Sergio R ^b  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Injective modules; Injectivity domain; Poor modules

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957569286     PISSN: 00218693     EISSN: 1090266X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alahmadi A.N., Alkan M., López-Permouth S.R. Poor modules: The opposite of injectivity. Glasg. Math. J. 2010, 52A:7-17.
2. Anderson F.W., Fuller K.R. Rings and Categories of Modules 1992, Springer-Verlag, New York.
3. Dung N.V., Smith P.F. Rings for which certain modules are CS. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 1995, 102(3):273-287.
4. Er N. Rings whose modules are direct sums of extending modules. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2009, 137(7):2265-2271.
5. Er N., López-Permouth S.R., Sökmez N. Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal injectivity domains. J. Algebra 2011, 330(1):404-417.
6. Facchini A. Module Theory. Endomorphism Rings and Direct Sum Decompositions in Some Classes of Modules 1998, Birkhäuser Verlag.
7. Faith C. Algebra II: Ring Theory. Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 1976, vol. 191. Springer-Verlag.
8. Goodearl K.R. Singular Torsion and the Splitting Properties. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 1972, vol. 124. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
9. Huynh D.V., Smith P.F., Wisbauer R. A note on GV-modules with Krull dimension. Glasg. Math. J. 1990, 32(3):389-390.
10. Mohamed S.H., Müller B.J. Continuous and Discrete Modules 1990, Cambridge University Press.
11. Rayar M. On small and cosmall modules. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 1982, 39(4):389-392.