Is the avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals' responsiveness to humans influenced by either the dominant or flightiest animal in the group?

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 132, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 107-113

  Mazurek, Mickael ^a,b   McGee, Mark ^a   Minchin, William ^a   Crowe, Mark A ^b   Earley, Bernadette ^a  

^a ANIMAL AND GRASSLAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Avoidance distance; Cattle; Dominance; Human animal relationship (HAR)

Indexed keywords

AVOIDANCE REACTION; CATTLE; DOMINANCE; GENOTYPE;

ANIMALIA; BOS; FRIESIA;

EID: 79957555015     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Babu L.K., Pandey H.N., Sahoo A. Effect of individual versus group rearing on ethological and physiological responses of crossbred calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 87:177-191.
2. Bartussek H. A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals' well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1999, 61:179-192.
3. Bøe K.E., Færevik G. Grouping and social preferences in calves, heifers and cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 80:175-190.
4. Boissy A., Bouissou M.F. Effects of early handling on heifers' subsequent reactivity to humans and to unfamiliar situations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988, 22:259-273.
5. Boissy A., le Neindre P. Social influences on the reactivity of heifers: implications for learning abilities in operant conditioning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1990, 25:149-165.
6. Boissy A., Terlouw C., le Neindre P. Presence of cues from stressed conspecifics increases reactivity to aversive events in cattle: evidence for the existence of alarm substances in urine. Physiol. Behav. 1998, 63:489-495.
7. Boivin X., Gilard F., Egal D. The effect of early human contact and the separation method from the dam on responses of beef calves to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 120:132-139.
8. Botreau R., Veissier I., Perny P. Overall assessment of animal welfare: strategy adopted in Welfare Quality. Anim. Welfare 2009, 18:363-370.
9. Bouissou M.F., Boissy A., le Neindre P., Veissier I. The social behaviour of cattle. Social Behaviour in Farm Animals 2001, 113-145. Cabi Publishing, Wallingford, UK. L.J. Keeling, H.W. Gonyou (Eds.).
10. Breuer K., Hemsworth P.H., Barnett J.L., Matthews L.R., Coleman G.J. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 66:273-288.
11. Breuer K., Hemsworth P.H., Coleman G.J. The effect of positive or negative handling on the behavioural and physiological responses of non lactating heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 84:3-22.
12. Capdeville J., Veissier I. A method of assessing welfare in loose housed dairy cows at farm level, focusing on animal observations. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect A: Anim. Sci. Suppl. 2001, 30:62-68.
13. Daycard L. Structure sociale de la population de bovins sauvages de l'ile d'amsterdam, sud de l'Océan indien. Rev. Ecol. (Terre et Vie) 1990, 45:35-53.
14. de Passillé A.M., Rushen J. Can we measure human-animal interactions in on-farm animal welfare assessment? Some unresolved issues. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 92:193-209.
15. Dumont B., Meuret M., Boissy A., Petit M. Le pâturage vu par l'animal: mécanismes comportementaux et application en élevage. Fourrages 2001, 166:213-238.
16. Dumont B., Boissy A., Achard C., Sibbald A.M., Erhard H.W. Consistency of animal order in spontaneous group movements allows the measurement of leadership in a group of grazing heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 95:55-66.
17. Forkman B., Boissy A., Meunier-Salaün M.C., Canali E., Jones R.B. A critical review on fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 92:340-374.
18. Gibbons J., Lawrence A., Haskell M. Responsiveness of dairy cows to human approach and novel stimuli. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 116:163-173.
19. Grignard L., Boissy A., Boivin X., Garel J.P., le Neindre P. The social environment influences the behavioural responses of beef cattle to handling. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 68:1-11.
20. Grignard L., Boivin X., Boissy A., le Neindre P. Do beef cattle react consistently to different handling situations?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001, 71:263-276.
21. Hemsworth P.H., Price E.O., Borgwardt R. Behavioural responses of domestic pigs and cattle to humans and novel stimuli. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996, 50:43-56.
22. Hemsworth P.H., Coleman G.J. Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity of Intensively Farmed Animals 1998, Cabi Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
23. Hemsworth P.H., Coleman G.J., Barnett L., Borg S. Relationships between human-animal interactions and the productivity of dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78:2821-2831.
24. Hemsworth P.H. Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 81:185-198.
25. Johnsen P.F., Johannesson T., Sandøe P. Assessment of farm animal welfare at herd level: many goals, many methods. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A: Anim. Sci. Suppl. 2001, 30:26-33.
26. Lazo A. Social segregation and the maintenance of social stability in a feral cattle population. Anim. Behav. 1994, 48:1133-1141.
27. Lensink B.J., Veissier I., Florand L. The farmer's influence on calve's behaviour, health and production of a veal unit. Anim. Sci. 2001, 72:105-116.
28. Lensink B.J., van Reenen C.G., Engel B., Rodenburg T.B., Veissier I. Repeatability and reliability of an approach test to determine calves' responsiveness to humans: "a brief report" Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 83:325-330.
29. Mazurek M., Marie M., Desor D. Potential animal centred indicator of dairy goats welfare. Anim. Welfare 2007, 16:161-164.
30. Pajor E.A., Rushen J., de Passilé A.M. Dairy cattle's choice of handling treatments in a Y-maze. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 80:93-107.
31. Pfeffer P. Une espèce en sursis: le kouprey. Le Courrier de la Nature 1971, 18:57-60.
32. Rushen J., Taylor A.A., de Passillé A.M. Domestic animals' fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 65:285-303.
33. SAS, 2003. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
34. Smith B. Moving 'em: A Guide to Low Stress Handling 1998, The Graziers Hui, pp. 91-100.
35. Sundrum A., Anderson R., Postler G. Tiergerechtheitindex-200- Ein Leitfaden zur Beurteilung von Haltungsystemen fur Rinder, Kalber, Legenhenen une Schweine 1994, Verlag Kollen, Bohn, 211 pp.
36. Taylor A.A., Davis H. Individual humans as discriminative stimuli for cattle (Bos taurus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998, 58:13-21.
37. Val-Laillet D., Guesdon V., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., de Passillé A.M., Rushen J. Allogrooming in cattle: relationships between social preferences, feeding displacements and social dominance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 116:141-149.
38. Waiblinger S., Menke C., Folsch D.W. Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 84:23-39.
39. Waiblinger S., Boivin X., Pedersen V., Tosi M.V., Janczak A.M., Visser E.K., Jones R.B. Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006, 101:185-242.
40. Waiblinger S. Human-animal relations. The Ethology of Domestic Animals: An Introductory Text 2009, CABI. 2nd ed. P. Jensen (Ed.).
41. Windschnurer I., Schmied C., Boivin X., Waiblinger S. Reliability and inter-test relationship of tests for on-farm assessment of dairy cows' relationship to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 114:37-53.
42. Windschnurer I., Boivin X., Waiblinger S. Reliability of an avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals' responsiveness to humans and a preliminary investigation of its association with farmers' attitudes on bull fattening farms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 117:117-127.