Morphology-based hypothesis testing in discrete random fields: A non-parametric method to address the multiple-comparison problem in neuroimaging

NeuroImage

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1954-1967

  Marroquin, Jose L ^a   Biscay, Rolando J ^b   Ruiz Correa, Salvador ^a   Alba, Alfonso ^c   Ramirez, Roxana ^a   Armony, Jorge L ^d  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN MATEMÁTICAS   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ   (Mexico)

^d DOUGLAS MENTAL HEALTH UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HYPOTHESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY BASED HYPOTHESIS TESTING; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 79957512772     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.081     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abdi H. Bonferroni and Sidák corrections for multiple comparisons. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics 2007, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. N.J. Salkind (Ed.).
2. Benjamini Y., Heller R. False discovery rates for spatial signals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2007, 102(480):1272-1281.
3. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R Stat. Soc. B 1995, 57:289-300.
4. Bullmore E.T., Suckling J., Overmeyer S.R., Taylor E., Brammer M.J. Global, voxel and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images ofthe brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1999, 18(1):32-42.
5. Chumbley J.R., Friston K.J. False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields. Neuroimage 2009, 44(1):62-70.
6. Chumbley J.R., Worsley K., Flandin G., Friston K. Topological FDR for neuroimaging. Neuroimage 2009, 49:3057-3064.
7. Eddy W. The challenge of functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Comput. Gr. Stat. 1998, 8:545-558.
8. Evans A., Kamber M., Collins D., MacDonald D. An MRI-based probabilistic atlas of neuroanatomy. Magnetic Resonance Scanning and Epilepsy 1994, 263-274. Plenum, New York. S. Shorvon, D. Fish, F. Andermann, G. Bydder (Eds.).
9. Friston K.J., Jezzard P., Turner R. Analysis of functional MRI time series. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1994, 1(2):153-171.
10. Friston K.J., Worsley K.J., Frackowiak R.S.J., Mazziotta J.C., Evans A.C. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1994, 1:214-220.
11. Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images 2007, Academic Press. K.J. Friston, J.T. Ashburner, S.J. Kiebel, T.E. Nichols, W.D. Penny (Eds.).
12. Genovese C.R., Lazar N., Nichols T.E. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002, 15(4):870-878.
13. Hayasaka S., Nichols T.E. Combining voxel intensity and cluster extent with permutation test framework. Neuroimage 2004, 23:54-63.
14. Heller R., Stanley D., Yekutieli D., Rubin N., Benjamini Y. Cluster-based analysis of fMRI data. Neuroimage 2006, 33:599-608.
15. Holmes A.P., Blair R.C., Watson J.D.G., Ford I. Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996, 16:722.
16. Jaccard P. The distribution of flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 1912, 11:37-50.
17. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17(11):4302-4311.
18. Keller T.A., Just M.A., Stenger V.A. Reading Span and the Time-Course of Cortical Activation in Sentence-Picture Verification 2001, Annual Convention of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
19. Langer D.R.M., Jansen J.F.A., Backes W.H. Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2007, 38:43-56.
20. Lehmann E.L., Romano J.P. Testing Statistical Hypothesis 2005, Springer-Verlag, New York.
21. Marroquin J.L., Harmony T., Rodriguez V., Valdes-Sosa P. Exploratory EEG data analysis for physiological experiments. Neuroimage 2004, 21:991-999.
22. Mitchell T.M., Hutchinson R., Niculescu R.S., Pereira F., Wang X., Just M., Newman S. Learning to decode cognitive states from brain images. Mach. Learn. 2004, 57(1-2):145-175.
23. Nichols T.E. FWE-Corrected Inference: Parametric Conservativeness and Nonparametric Alternatives 2002, Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, New York.
24. Nichols T.E., Hayasaka S. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2003, 12:419-446.
25. Pantazis D., Nichols T.E., Baillet S., Leahy M. A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data. Neuroimage 2005, 25:383-394.
26. Pesarin F. Multivariate Permutation Tests with Applications in Biostatistics 2001, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
27. Poline J.B., Worsley K.J., Evans A.C., Friston K.J. Combining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging. Neuroimage 1997, 5:83-96.
28. Purdon P., Weisskoff R. Effect of temporal autocorrelation due to physiological noise and stimulus paradigm on voxel-level false-positive rates in fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1998, 6:239249.
29. Raz J., Zheng H., Ombao H., Turetsky B. Statistical tests based on experimental randomization. Neuroimage 2003, 19:226-232.
30. Sergerie K., Chochol C., Armony J.L. The role of amigdala in emotional processing: a quantitaive meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2008, 32:811-830.
31. Serra J. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology 1984, Ac. Press.
32. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis 1986, Chapman and Hall, London.
33. Smith S.M., Nichols T.E. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009, 44:83-98.
34. Soille P. Morphological Image Analysis 2004, Springer.
35. Worsley K., Evans A., Marrett S., Neelin P. A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1992, 12:900918.
36. Zarahn E., Aguirre G., D'Esposito M. Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. Neuroimage 1997, 5:179197.
37. Zhang H., Nichols T.E., Johnson T.D. Cluster mass inference via random field theory. Neuroimage 2009, 44:51-61.