NEW PRACTICE REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JUDGMENTS OF THE STRASBOURG COURT

Italian Yearbook of International Law

Volumn 15, Issue , 2006, Pages 3-23

  Caflisch, Lucius ^a  

^a GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957512214     PISSN: 03915107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Rules of Court (July 2006), published by the Registry of the Court.
2. While the individuals in question do not have to be nationals of such a State, verifi cation can take place only as against States Parties to the Convention.
3. No. 71503/01, GC, judgment of 8 April 2004, Judgments and Decisions, 2004-II, p. 221.
4. No. 31443/96, GC, judgment of 22 June 2004, Judgments and Decisions, 2004-V, p. 1.
5. Nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, GC, Judgments and Decisions, 2000-VIII, p. 471.
6. See for example Gençel v. Turkey, No. 53431/99, judgment of 23 October 2003, given by a chamber of the Third Section, para. 27 (translated from the French).
7. No. 67972/01, judgment by a chamber of the Second Section of 18 May 2004, para. 86.
8. No. 46221/99, GC, judgment of 12 May 2005.
9. No. 71503/01, para. 202.
10. No. 48787/99, GC, Judgments and Decisions, 2004-VII, p. 179.
11. Judgment, para. 331.
12. Article 15 of Protocol No. 14 (introducing a new Article 39(4) into the Convention);
13. see also the Explanatory Report, para. 94.
14. First Broniowski judgment, cit. supra note 5, paras. 126-187.
15. In para. 99 of its judgment of 10 May 2001 in Cyprus v. Turkey, No. 25781/94, GC, Judgments and Decisions, 2001-IV, p. 3, the Court defi ned an "administrative practice" as being "a repetition of acts incompatible with the Convention and offi cial tolerance by the State authorities".
16. First Broniowski judgment, cit. supra note 5, paras. 193 and 189.
17. Recommendations (2004) 4, 5 and 6 of 12 May 2004.
18. First Broniowski judgment, cit. supra note 5, para. 192.
19. First Broniowski judgment, cit. supra note 5, p. 79.
20. Second Broniowski judgment (friendly settlement).
21. No. 35014/97, judgment of 22 February 2005.
22. No. 56581/00, judgment of 10 November 2004.
23. No. 56581/00, judgment of 1 March 2006, para. 123.
24. No. 30210/96, GC, judgment of 26 October 2000, Judgments and Decisions, 2000-XI, p. 197, paras. 146 to 160.
25. No. 23032/02, para. 93.
26. No. 22913/04, paras. 90 to 95.
27. Loizidou v. Turkey, GC, judgment of 23 March 1995 (preliminary objections), Judgments and Decisions, Series A, No. 310;
28. No. 25781/94, GC, judgment of 10 May 2001, Judgments and Decisions, 2001-IV, p. 1, paras. 174 and 185.
29. Formula taken from the Scozzari and Giunta judgment, cit. supra note 6.
30. No. 46347/99, judgment of 22 December 2005, paras. 37 to 40;
31. the quotation is drawn from para. 40.
32. Riccardi Pizzati v. Italy, No. 62361/00;
33. Musci v. Italy, No. 64699/01;
34. Giuseppe Mostacciuolo (No. 1) v. Italy, No. 64705/01;
35. Cocchiarella v. Italy, No. 64886/01;
36. Apicella v. Italy, No. 64890/01;
37. Ernestina Zullo v. Italy, No. 64897/01;
38. Giuseppa and Orestina Procaccini v. Italy, No. 65075/01;
39. Giuseppe Mostacciuolo (No. 2) v. Italy, No. 65102/01.
40. The Grand Chamber judgments in all these cases are dated 29 March 2006.
41. No. 36813/97, para. 228.
42. Nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, Judgments and Decisions 2004-VI, p. 81.
43. See the Içyer judgment, paras. 73 ff.