Context-dependent codon partition models provide significant increases in model fit in atpB and rbcL protein-coding genes

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Baele, Guy ^a,b,c   Van De Peer, Yves ^a,b   Vansteelandt, Stijn ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c REGA INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; DATA SET; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLANT; PROTEIN; TAXONOMY;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHLOROPLAST GENOME; CODON; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PLANT;

BAYES THEOREM; CODON; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, CHLOROPLAST; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS;

EID: 79957510431     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-145     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Choosing appropriate substitution models for the phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding sequences. B Shapiro A Rambaut AJ Drummond, Mol Biol Evol 2006 23 1 7 9 16177232 (Pubitemid 41785947)
2. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. D Posada KA Crandall, Bioinformatics 1998 14 9 817 818 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817 9918953 (Pubitemid 28552116)
3. The closest living relatives of land plants. KG Karol RM McCourt MT Cimino CF Delwiche, Science 2001 294 5550 2351 2353 10.1126/science.1065156 11743201 (Pubitemid 33140558)
4. Phylogeny of Capparaceae and Brassicaceae based on chloroplast sequence data. JC Hall KJ Sytsma HH Iltis, Am J Bot 2002 89 11 1826 1842 10.3732/ajb.89.11.1826 (Pubitemid 35442072)
5. Brassicaceae phylogeny and trichome evolution. MA Beilstein IA Al-Shehbaz EA Kellogg, Am J Bot 2006 93 4 607 619 10.3732/ajb.93.4.607
6. Are combined analyses better than single gene phylogenies? A case study using SSU rDNA and rbcL sequence comparisons in the Zygnematophyceae (Streptophyta). AA Gontcharov B Marin M Melkonian, Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004 21 3 612 624 14739253 (Pubitemid 38339677)
7. A New Method for Calculating Evolutionary Substitution Rates. C Lanave G Preparata C Saccone G Serio, Journal of Molecular Evolution 1984 20 1 86 93 10.1007/BF02101990 6429346 (Pubitemid 14116237)
8. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. ZH Yang, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1996 11 9 367 372 10.1016/0169-5347(96) 10041-0 21622464
9. An empirical examination of the utility of codon-substitution models in phylogeny reconstruction. FR Ren H Tanaka ZH Yang, Systematic Biol 2005 54 5 808 818 10.1080/10635150500354688 (Pubitemid 43142296)
10. Codon-Based Model of Nucleotide Substitution for Protein-Coding DNA-Sequences. N Goldman ZH Yang, Molecular Biology and Evolution 1994 11 5 725 736 7968486
11. The influence of neighboring base composition on substitutions in plant chloroplast coding sequences. BR Morton, Molecular Biology and Evolution 1997 14 2 189 194 (Pubitemid 27061443)
12. TH Jukes CR Cantor, Evolution of protein molecules New York: Academic Press 1969
13. A Model-Based Approach to Study Nearest-Neighbor Influences Reveals Complex Substitution Patterns in Non-coding Sequences. G Baele Y Van de Peer S Vansteelandt, Systematic Biol 2008 57 5 675 692 10.1080/10635150802422324
14. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. ZH Yang, Journal of Molecular Evolution 1996 42 5 587 596 10.1007/BF02352289 8662011
15. Dating of the Human Ape Splitting by a Molecular Clock of Mitochondrial-DNA. M Hasegawa H Kishino TA Yano, Journal of Molecular Evolution 1985 22 2 160 174 10.1007/BF02101694 3934395 (Pubitemid 16227864)
16. Estimation of hominoid ancestral population sizes under bayesian coalescent models incorporating mutation rate variation and sequencing errors. R Burgess Z Yang, Mol Biol Evol 2008 25 9 1979 1994 10.1093/molbev/msn148 18603620
17. Modelling the ancestral sequence distribution and model frequencies in context-dependent models for primate non-coding sequences. G Baele Y Van de Peer S Vansteelandt, Bmc Evol Biol 2010
18. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Felsenstein, J Mol Evol 1981 17 6 368 376 10.1007/BF01734359 7288891 (Pubitemid 11016207)
19. WR Gilks S Richardson DJ Spiegelhalter, Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice London: Chapman & Hall 1996
20. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. JP Huelsenbeck F Ronquist R Nielsen JP Bollback, Science 2001 294 5550 2310 2314 10.1126/science.1065889 11743192 (Pubitemid 33140548)
21. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. MA Tanner WH Wong, J Am Stat Assoc 1987 82 398 528 540 10.2307/2289457
22. Should phylogenetic models be trying to "fit an elephant"? M Steel, Trends Genet 2005 21 6 307 309 10.1016/j.tig.2005.04.001 15922824 (Pubitemid 40726382)
23. Bayes Factors. RE Kass AE Raftery, J Am Stat Assoc 1995 90 430 773 795 10.2307/2291091
24. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. N Lartillot H Philippe, Systematic Biol 2006 55 2 195 207 10.1080/10635150500433722 (Pubitemid 43355101)
25. Efficient context-dependent model building based on clustering posterior distributions for non-coding sequences. G Baele YV Peer S Vansteelandt, Bmc Evol Biol 2009 9 87 10.1186/1471-2148-9-87 19405957
26. Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models. MA Suchard RE Weiss JS Sinsheimer, Molecular Biology and Evolution 2001 18 6 1001 1013 11371589 (Pubitemid 32520473)
27. Model parameterization, prior distributions, and the general time-reversible model in Bayesian phylogenetics. DJ Zwickl MT Holder, Systematic Biol 2004 53 6 877 888 10.1080/10635150490522584 (Pubitemid 40141313)
28. Investigating protein-coding sequence evolution with probabilistic codon substitution models. M Anisimova C Kosiol, Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009 26 2 255 271 10.1093/molbev/msn232 18922761
29. Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. DG Hwang P Green, P Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 39 13994 14001 10.1073/pnas.0404142101 (Pubitemid 39305018)
30. Neighboring base composition and transversion/transition bias in a comparison of rice and maize chloroplast noncoding regions. BR Morton, P Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92 21 9717 9721 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9717
31. The influence of specific neighboring bases on substitution bias in noncoding regions of the plant chloroplast genome. BR Morton VM Oberholzer MT Clegg, Journal of molecular evolution 1997 45 3 227 231 10.1007/PL00006224 9302315 (Pubitemid 27418348)
32. Variation in mutation dynamics across the maize genome as a function of regional and flanking base composition. BR Morton IV Bi MD McMullen BS Gaut, Genetics 2006 172 1 569 577 16219784 (Pubitemid 43345516)
33. Variation in efficiency of DNA mismatch repair at different sites in the yeast genome. JD Hawk L Stefanovic JC Boyer TD Petes RA Farber, P Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 102 24 8639 8643 10.1073/pnas.0503415102 (Pubitemid 40862788)
34. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. SV Muse BS Gaut, Molecular Biology and Evolution 1994 11 5 715 724 7968485 (Pubitemid 24274880)
35. Using non-reversible context-dependent evolutionary models to study substitution patterns in primate non-coding sequences. G Baele Y Van de Peer S Vansteelandt, Journal of molecular evolution 2010 71 1 34 50 10.1007/s00239-010-9362-y 20623275
36. J Felsenstein, Inferring phylogenies Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates 2004