Quantifying skin motion artifact error of the hindfoot and forefoot marker clusters with the optical tracking of a multi-segment foot model using single-plane fluoroscopy

Gait and Posture

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 44-48

  Shultz, R ^a,c   Kedgley, A E ^b,c   Jenkyn, T R ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fluoroscopy; Gait; Multi segment foot model; Optical motion capture; Skin motion error

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CALCANEUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GAIT; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ARTIFACTS; CALCANEUS; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; FOOT; FOREFOOT, HUMAN; HEEL; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; POSTURE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROTATION; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 79957475765     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: 18792219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Nester C., Jones R.K., Liu A., Howard D., Lundberg A., Arndt A., et al. Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers. J Biomech 2007, 40(15):3412-3423.
2. Leardini A., Chiari L., Della Croce U., Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Gait Posture 2005, 21(February (2)):212-225.
3. Manal K., McClay I., Stanhope S., Richards J., Galinat B. Comparison of surface mounted markers and attachment methods in estimating tibial rotations during walking: an in vivo study. Gait Posture 2000, 11(February (1)):38-45.
4. Cappozzo A., Cappello A., Della Croce U., Pensalfini F. Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997, 44(December (12)):1165-1174.
5. Reinschmidt C., van den Bogert A.J., Nigg B.M., Lundberg A., Murphy N. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech 1997, 30(July (7)):729-732.
6. Arndt A., Wolf P., Liu A., Nester C., Stacoff A., Jones R., et al. Intrinsic foot kinematics measured in vivo during the stance phase of slow running. J Biomech 2007, 40(12):2672-2678.
7. Reinschmidt C., van Den Bogert A.J., Murphy N., Lundberg A., Nigg B.M. Tibiocalcaneal motion during running, measured with external and bone markers. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1997, 12(January (1)):8-16.
8. Arndt A., Westblad P., Winson I., Hashimoto T., Lundberg A. Ankle and subtalar kinematics measured with intracortical pins during the stance phase of walking. Foot Ankle Int 2004, 25(May (5)):357-364.
9. Benoit D.L., Ramsey D.K., Lamontagne M., Xu L., Wretenberg P., Renstrom P. Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 2006, 24(October (2)):152-164.
10. Wrbaskic N., Dowling J.J. An investigation into the deformable characteristics of the human foot using fluoroscopic imaging. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007, 22(February (2)):230-238.
11. Lundberg A. Kinematics of the ankle and foot In vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1989, 233:1-24.
12. Lundberg A., Goldie I., Kalin B., Selvik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle 1989, 9(February (4)):194-200.
13. Lundberg A., Svensson O.K., Bylund C., Goldie I., Selvik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex. Part 2: pronation and supination. Foot Ankle 1989, 9(April (5)):248-253.
14. Lundberg A., Svensson O.K., Bylund C., Selvik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex. Part 3: influence of leg rotation. Foot Ankle 1989, 9(June (6)):304-309.
15. Komistek R.D., Stiehl J.B., Buechel F.F., Northcut E.J., Hajner M.E. A determination of ankle kinematics using fluoroscopy. Foot Ankle Int 2000, 21(April (4)):343-350.
16. Wearing S.C., Smeathers J.E., Yates B., Sullivan P.M., Urry S.R., Dubois P. Sagittal movement of the medial longitudinal arch is unchanged in plantar fasciitis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004, 36(October (10)):1761-1767.
17. de Asla R.J., Wan L., Rubash H.E., Li G. Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex? Applicaiton of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique. J Orthop Res 2006, 24(5):1019-1027.
18. Gefen A., Megido-Ravid M., Itzchak Y., Arcan M. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clincal applications. J Biomech Eng 2000, 122(6):630-639.
19. Perlman P.R., Siskind V., Jorgensen A., Wearing S., Squires S. Changes in the calcaneal pitch during stance phase of gait. A fluoroscopic analysis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1996, 86(July (7)):322-326.
20. Tranberg R., Karlsson D. The relative skin movement of the foot: a 2-D roentgen photogrammetry study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1998, 13(January (1)):71-76.
21. Jenkyn T.R., Nicol A.C. A multi-segment kinematic model of the foot with a novel definition of forefoot motion for use in clinical gait analysis during walking. J Biomech 2007, 40(14):3271-3278.
22. Jenkyn T.R., Anas K., Nichol A. Foot segment kinematics during normal walking using a multisegment model of the foot and ankle complex. J Biomech Eng 2009, 131(March (3)):034504.
23. Gluer C.C., Blake G., Lu Y., Blunt B.A., Jergas M., Genant H.K. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995, 5(4):262-270.
24. Nordin M., Frankel V. Basic biomechanics of the muscloskeletal system 2001, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland. 3rd ed.
25. Perry J., Thorofare N.J. Gait analysis: normal pathological function 1992, Slack Inc., U.S.A.
26. Stagni R., Fantozzi S., Cappello A., Leardini A. Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005, 20(March (3)):320-329.