High-resolution fMRI detects neuromodulation of individual brainstem nuclei by electrical tongue stimulation in balance-impaired individuals

NeuroImage

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 2129-2137

  Wildenberg, Joseph C ^a   Tyler, Mitchell E ^b,c   Danilov, Yuri P ^b   Kaczmarek, Kurt A ^b   Meyerand, Mary E ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Balance; FMRI; High resolution; Stimulation; Tongue; Trigeminal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BALANCE IMPAIRMENT; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN STEM; CEREBELLUM; CINGULATE GYRUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; OPTIC FLOW; POSTERIOR FOSSA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; TONGUE; TRIGEMINAL NUCLEUS; VESTIBULAR NUCLEUS;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC FLOW; POSTURAL BALANCE; SENSATION DISORDERS; TONGUE;

EID: 79957459922     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.074     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alvarez J.C., Diaz C., Suarez C., Fernandez J.A., Gonzalez del Rey C., Navarro A., Tolivia J. Aging and the human vestibular nuclei: morphometric analysis. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2000, 114(3):149-172.
2. Angelaki D.E., Yakusheva T.A., Green A.M., Dickman J.D., Blazquez P.M. Computation of egomotion in the macaque cerebellar vermis. Cerebellum (London, England) 2010, 9(2):174-182.
3. Anker A.R., Ali A., Arendt H.E., Cass S.P., Cotter L.A., Jian B.J., Tamrazi B., Yates B.J. Use of electrical vestibular stimulation to alter genioglossal muscle activity in awake cats. J. Vestib. Res. 2003, 13(1):1-8.
4. Balaban C.D., Thayer J.F. Neurological bases for balance-anxiety links. J. Anxiety Disord. 2001, 15(1-2):53-79.
5. Barmack N.H. Inferior olive and oculomotor system. Prog. Brain Res. 2006, 151:269-291.
6. Bausell R.B., Li Y. Power analysis for experimental research: a practical guide for the biological, medical and social sciences 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York.
7. Bicchi A., Scilingo E.P., Ricciardi E., Pietrini P. Tactile flow explains haptic counterparts of common visual illusions. Brain Res. Bull. 2008, 75(6):737-741.
8. Brandt T., Dieterich M. The vestibular cortex: its locations, functions, and disorders. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 871:293-312. 1 OTOLITH FUNCTION IN SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND MOVEMENT).
9. Brandt T., Huppert T., Hufner K., Zingler V.C., Dieterich M., Strupp M. Long-term course and relapses of vestibular and balance disorders. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2010, 28(1):69-82.
10. Bronstein A.M. Vision and vertigo: some visual aspects of vestibular disorders. J. Neurol. 2004, 251(4):381-387.
11. Buisseret-Delmas C., Compoint C., Delfini C., Buisseret P. Organisation of reciprocal connections between trigeminal and vestibular nuclei in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999, 409(1):153-168.
12. Calhoun V.D., Adali T., McGinty V.B., Pekar J.J., Watson T.D., Pearlson G.D. fMRI activation in a visual-perception task: network of areas detected using the general linear model and independent components analysis. Neuroimage 2001, 14(5):1080-1088.
13. Cardin V., Smith A.T. Sensitivity of human visual and vestibular cortical regions to egomotion-compatible visual stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(8):1964-1973.
14. Carter C.S., van Veen V. Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 7(4):367-379.
15. Chebat D.R., Rainville C., Kupers R., Ptito M. Tactile-'visual'acuity of the tongue in early blind individuals. Neuroreport 2007, 18(18):1901-1904.
16. Collignon O., Voss P., Lassonde M., Lepore F. Cross-modal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 192(3):343-358.
17. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29(3):162-173.
18. Craig A.D. How do you feel? interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3(8):655-666.
19. Danckert J., Ferber S., Goodale M.A. Direct effects of prismatic lenses on visuomotor control: an event-related functional MRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(8):1696-1704.
20. Danilov Y., Tyler M., Skinner K., Hogle R., Bach-y-Rita P. Efficacy of electrotactile vestibular substitution in patients with peripheral and central vestibular loss. J. Vestib. Res. 2007, 17(2):119-130.
21. Danilov YP, Tyler ME, Skinner KL, Bach-y-Rita P. 2006. Efficacy of electrotactile vestibular substitution in patients with bilateral vestibular and central balance loss. Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference Suppl:6605-6609.
22. Diedrichsen J. A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum. Neuroimage 2006, 33(1):127-138.
23. Diedrichsen J., Balsters J.H., Flavell J., Cussans E., Ramnani N. A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum. Neuroimage 2009, 46(1):39-46.
24. Dieterich M., Bauermann T., Best C., Stoeter P., Schlindwein P. Evidence for cortical visual substitution of chronic bilateral vestibular failure (an fMRI study). Brain 2007, 130(8):2108-2116.
25. Dieterich M., Brandt T. Functional brain imaging of peripheral and central vestibular disorders. Brain J. Neurol. 2008, 131(Pt 10):2538-2552.
26. Duvernoy H.M. The human brain stem and cerebellum 1995, Springer-Verlag, New York.
27. Fetsch C.R., Turner A.H., DeAngelis G.C., Angelaki D.E. Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(49):15601.
28. Forman S.D., Cohen J.D., Fitzgerald M., Eddy W.F., Mintun M.A., Noll D.C. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 33(5):636-647.
29. Fries W. Pontine projection from striate and prestriate visual cortex in the macaque monkey: an anterograde study. Vis. Neurosci. 1990, 4(3):205-216.
30. Fujino S., Takahashi T., Ueno T. Influence of voluntary teeth clenching on the stabilization of postural stance disturbed by electrical stimulation of unilateral lower limb. Gait Posture 2010, 31(1):122-125.
31. Furman J.M. Posturography: uses and limitations. Baillieres Clin. Neurol. 1994, 3(3):501-513.
32. Gerrits N.M., Voogd J., Magras I.N. Vestibular afferents of the inferior olive and the vestibulo-olivo-cerebellar climbing fiber pathway to the flocculus in the cat. Brain Res. 1985, 332(2):325-336.
33. Herrick J.L., Keifer J. Central trigeminal and posterior eighth nerve projections in the turtle chrysemys pictastudied in vitro. Brain Behav. Evol. 2000, 51(4):183-201.
34. Holroyd C.B., Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Nystrom L., Mars R.B., Coles M.G.H., Cohen J.D. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:497-498.
35. Indovina I., Maffei V., Bosco G., Zago M., Macaluso E., Lacquaniti F. Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex. Science 2005, 308(5720):416-419.
36. Jacob R.G., Redfern M.S., Furman J.M. Optic flow-induced sway in anxiety disorders associated with space and motion discomfort. J. Anxiety Disord. 1995, 9(5):411-425.
37. Johnstone T., Ores Walsh K.S., Greischar L.L., Alexander A.L., Fox A.S., Davidson R.J., Oakes T.R. Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple-subject fMRI analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27(10):779-788.
38. Kelley D.J., Oakes T.R., Greischar L.L., Chung M.K., Ollinger J.M., Greene E. Automatic physiological waveform processing for fMRI noise correction and analysis. PLoS One 2008, 3(3):e1751.
39. Kelly J.W., Loomis J.M., Beall A.C. The importance of perceived relative motion in the control of posture. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 161(3):285-292.
40. Kikuchi M., Naito Y., Senda M., Okada T., Shinohara S., Fujiwara K., Hori S.Y., Tona Y., Yamazaki H. Cortical activation during optokinetic stimulation - an fMRI study. Acta Oto Laryngologica 2009, 129(4):440-443.
41. Kisely M., Emri M., Lengyel Z., Kalvin B., Horvath G., Tron L., Miko L., Sziklai I., Toth A. Changes in brain activation caused by caloric stimulation in the case of cochleovestibular denervation-PET study. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2002, 23(10):967-973.
42. Lund T.E., Nørgaard M.D., Rostrup E., Rowe J.B., Paulson O.B. Motion or activity: their role in intra-and inter-subject variation in fMRI. Neuroimage 2005, 26(3):960-964.
43. Mahboobin A., Loughlin P.J., Redfern M.S., Sparto P.J. Sensory re-weighting in human postural control during moving-scene perturbations. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 167(2):260-267.
44. Marano E., Marcelli V., Stasio E.D., Bonuso S., Vacca G., Manganelli F., Marciano E., Perretti A. Trigeminal stimulation elicits a peripheral vestibular imbalance in migraine patients. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2005, 45(4):325-331.
45. Matteau I., Kupers R., Ricciardi E., Pietrini P., Ptito M. Beyond visual, aural and haptic movement perception: HMT+ is activated by electrotactile motion stimulation of the tongue in sighted and in congenitally blind individuals. Brain Res. Bull. 2010, 82:264-270.
46. Mergner T., Schweigart G., Maurer C., Blümle A. Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 167(4):535-556.
47. Mirka A., Black F.O. Clinical application of dynamic posturography for evaluating sensory integration and vestibular dysfunction. Neurol. Clin. 1990, 8(2):351-359.
48. Miyamoto T., Fukushima K., Takada T., de Waele C., Vidal P.P. Saccular stimulation of the human cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 423(1):68-72.
49. O'Connor K.W., Loughlin P.J., Redfern M.S., Sparto P.J. Postural adaptations to repeated optic flow stimulation in older adults. Gait Posture 2008, 28(3):385-391.
50. Ohlendorf S., Sprenger A., Speck O., Haller S., Kimmig H. Optic flow stimuli in and near the visual field centre: a group fMRI study of motion sensitive regions. PLoS One 2008, 3(12):e4043.
51. Oliveira F.T.P., McDonald J.J., Goodman D. Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19(12):1994-2004.
52. Palmisano S., Pinniger G.J., Ash A., Steele J.R. Effects of simulated viewpoint jitter on visually induced postural sway. Perception 2009, 38(3):442-453.
53. Pietrini P., Ptito M., Kupers R. Blindness and consciousness: new light from the dark. The Neurology of Consciousness 2009, 360-374. Academic Press. 1st ed. S. Laureys, G. Tononi (Eds.).
54. Poirier C., De Volder A.G., Scheiber C. What neuroimaging tells us about sensory substitution. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2007, 31(7):1064-1070.
55. Ptito M., Moesgaard S.M., Gjedde A., Kupers R. Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind. Brain 2005, 128(3):606.
56. Redfern M.S., Furman J.M. Postural sway of patients with vestibular disorders during optic flow. J. Vestib. Res. 1994, 4(3):221-230.
57. Ricciardi E., Vanello N., Sani L., Gentili C., Scilingo E.P., Landini L., Guazzelli M., Bicchi A., Haxby J.V., Pietrini P. The effect of visual experience on the development of functional architecture in hMT+. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991) 2007, 17(12):2933-2939.
58. Robinson B.S., Cook J.L., Richburg C.M.C., Price S.E. Use of an electrotactile vestibular substitution system to facilitate balance and gait of an individual with gentamicin-induced bilateral vestibular hypofunction and bilateral transtibial amputation. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2009, 33(3):150-159.
59. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics 2006, Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
60. Satoh Y., Ishizuka K.I., Murakami T. Modulation of the masseteric monosynaptic reflex by stimulation of the vestibular nuclear complex in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 466(1):16-20.
61. Slobounov S., Wu T., Hallett M., Shibasaki H., Slobounov E., Newell K. Neural underpinning of postural responses to visual field motion. Biol. Psychol. 2006, 72(2):188-197.
62. Tracey I., Iannetti G.D. Brainstem functional imaging in humans. Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 58:52-67.
63. Tyler M., Danilov Y., Bach-Y-Rita P. Closing an open-loop control system: vestibular substitution through the tongue. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2003, 2(2):159-164.
64. Visser J.E., Carpenter M.G., van der Kooij H., Bloem B.R. The clinical utility of posturography. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119(11):2424-2436.
65. Vuillerme N., Cuisinier R. Sensory supplementation through tongue electrotactile stimulation to preserve head stabilization in space in the absence of vision. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50(1):476-481.
66. Vuillerme N., Pinsault N., Fleury A., Chenu O., Demongeot J., Payan Y., Pavan P. Effectiveness of an electro-tactile vestibular substitution system in improving upright postural control in unilateral vestibular-defective patients. Gait Posture 2008, 28(4):711-715.
67. Wall J.T., Symonds L.L., Kaas J.H. Cortical and subcortical projections of the middle temporal area (MT) and adjacent cortex in galagos. J. Comp. Neurol. 1982, 211(2):193-214.
68. Weibull A., Gustavsson H., Mattsson S., Svensson J. Investigation of spatial resolution, partial volume effects and smoothing in functional MRI using artificial 3D time series. Neuroimage 2008, 41(2):346-353.
69. Wildenberg J.C., Tyler M.E., Danilov Y.P., Kaczmarek K.A., Meyerand M.E. Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation. Brain Imaging Behav. 2010, 4(3-4):199-211.