Letters as / not a genre

Life Writing

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 91-118

  Jolly, Margaretta ^a   Stanley, Liz ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957272472     PISSN: 14484528     EISSN: 17512964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10408340308518291     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott, Susan. 1984. “Susan Abbott and her mother Miriam, 1980”. In Between Ourselves:Letters between Mothers and Daughters 1750-1982, Edited by:Payne, Karen. 310–22. London:Picador.
2. Altman, Janet Gurkin. 1986. The Letter Book as a Literary Institution 1539–1789:Toward a Cultural History of Published Correspondences in France. Yale French Studies, 71:17–62.
3. Bawarshi, Anis. 2000. The Genre Function. College English, 62(3):335–60.
4. Bazerman, Charles. “Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions”. In Genre and the New Rhetoric, 19–26. Freedman and Medway.
5. Bazerman, Charles. 1997. “The Life of Genre, the Life in the Classroom”. In Genre and Writing:Issues, Arguments, Alternatives, Edited by:Bishop, Wendy, and Ostrom, Hans. 19–26. Portsmouth, NH:Boynton/Cook.
6. Bazerman, Charles. 2000. “Letters and the Social Grounding of Differentiated Genres”. In Letter Writing as a Social Practice, Edited by:David, Barton, and Hall, Nigel. 15–30. Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
7. Besnier, Nicolas. 1993. “Literacy and Feelings:The Encoding of Affect in Nukulaelae Letters”. In Cross-Cultural Approaches to Literacy, Edited by:Street, Brian. 62–86. Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press.
8. Birley, Robin. 1999. Roman Records from Vindolanda on Hadrian's Wall, Carlisle:Roman Army Museum Publications for the Vindolanda Trust.
9. Bishop, Elizabeth. 1994. One Art, Edited by:Giroux, Robert. New York:Farrar.
10. Bray, Bernard. 1969. Quelques Aspects Du Systeme Epistolaire De Mme De Sévigné. Revue d'Histoire Litteraire de la France, 69:491–505.
11. Clemens, Samuel L. 1988. Mark Twain's Letters, Edited by:Branch, Edgar, Frank, Michael, and Sanderson, Kenneth. Berkeley:University of California Press.
12. Cockin, Katherine. 2002. Ellen Terry, the Ghost-Writer, and the Laughing Statue:The Victorian Actress, Letters, and Life Writing. Journal of European Studies, 32(2&3):151–63.
13. Cronwright-Schreiner, Samuel. 1924. The Letters of Olive Schreiner 1876–1920, Edited by:Cronwright-Schreiner, Samuel. London:Fisher Unwin.
14. Devitt, Amy. 2000. “Integrating Rhetorical and Literary Theories of Genre”. In College English Vol. 62, 696–718. 6
15. Devitt, Amy, Bawarshi, Anis, and Reiff, Mary Jo. 2003. Materiality and Genre in the Study of Discourse Communities. College English, 65(5):541–58.
16. Draznin Yaffa, Claire. 1992. My Other Self:The Letters of Olive Schreiner and Havelock Ellis 1884–1920, New York:P. Lang.
17. Earle, Rebecca. 1999. Epistolary Selves:Letters and Letter-Writers, 1600–1945, Aldershot:Ashgate.
18. Farrell, Michele Longino. 1991. Performing Motherhood:The Sévigné Correspondence, Hanover:University Press of New England.
19. Ferrier, Kathleen. 2003. Letters and Diaries of Kathleen Ferrier, Edited by:Fifield, C. Woodbridge:Boydell Press.
20. Freedman, Aviva, and Peter, Medway. 1994. Genre and the New Rhetoric, Edited by:Freedman, Aviva and Peter, Medway. Bristol, PA:Taylor.
21. Gandhi, Mohandas K. 1968. The Collected Works of Mohandas K. Gandhi (50 volumes), Delhi:Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting of the Government of India.
22. Horowitz, Louise K. 1981. The Correspondence of Madame De Sévigné:Letters or Belles-Lettres?. French Forum, 6:13–27.
23. Jolly, Margaretta. 2002. Confidantes, Co-Workers and Correspondents:Feminist Discourses of Letter-Writing from 1970-Present. Journal of European Studies, 32(2&3):267–82.
24. Jolly, Margaretta. 2004. Censored/Uncensored:Lovers in Dialogue. Auto/Biography, 12(2):165–84.
25. Jolly, Margaretta. 2005. “Myths of Unity:Remembering the Second World War through Letters and Their Editing”. In Arms and the Self, Edited by:Vernon, Alex. Kent, Ohio:Kent State University Press.
26. Lejeune, Philippe. 1975. Le Pacte Autobiographique, Paris:Seuil.
27. Maybin, Janet. 2000. “Death Row Penfriends:Some Effects of Letter Writing on Identity and Relationships”. In Letter Writing as a Social Practice, Edited by:Barton, David, and Hall, Nigel. 151–78. Amsterdam Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
28. Miller, Carolyn. 1984. Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70:151–67.
29. Miller, Carolyn. Rhetorical Community:The Cultural Basis of Genre. 67–78. Freedman and Medway
30. Olney, James. 1972. Metaphors of Self:The Meaning of Autobiography, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
31. Paulin, Tom. 1994. Newness and Nowness:The Extraordinary Brilliance of Elizabeth Bishop's Letters. Times Literary Supplement, 29 April:3–6.
32. Porter, Charles A. 1986. Foreword.Men/Women of Letters. Yale French Studies, 71:1–16.
33. Prosser, Jay. 2004. Light in the Dark Room:Photography and Loss, Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
34. Redford, Bruce. 1986. The Converse of the Pen:Acts of Intimacy in the Eighteenth-Century Familiar Letter, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
35. Ribeiro, Alvaro S.J. 1993. “Real Business, Elegant Civility and Rhetorical Structure in Two Letters by Charles Burney”. In Sent as a Gift:Eight Correspondents from the Eighteenth Century, Edited by:Mckenzie, Alan T., 90–108. Athens, Ga:University of Georgia Press.
36. Rive, Richard. 1987. Olive Schreiner Letters:Volume I 1871–1899, Edited by:Rive, Richard. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
37. Stanley, Liz. 1984. The Diaries of Hannah Cullwick, Edited by:Stanley, Liz. London, New Brunswick:Virago Press, Rutgers University Press.
38. Stanley, Liz. 1987. Biography as Microscope or Kaleidoscope?:The Case of 'Power' in Hannah Cullwick's Relationship with Arthur Munby. Women's Studies International Forum, 10(1):19–31.
39. Stanley, Liz. 1992. The Auto/Biographical I:Theory and Practice of Feminist Auto/Biography, Manchester:Manchester University Press.
40. Stanley, Liz. 2001. Mimesis and Metaphor in the Interpretation of Lives:Holding Out an Olive Branch to Schreiner Criticism. Women's History Review, 9:27–50.
41. Stanley, Liz. 2002a. Imperialism, Labour and the New Women:Olive Schreiner's Social Theory, Durham, UK:sociologypress.
42. Stanley, Liz. 2002b. Shadows Lying Across Her Pages:Epistolary Aspects of Reading the Eventful I' in Olive Schreiner's Letters. Journal of European Studies, 32:251–66.
43. Stanley, Liz. 2002c. “Views Don't Make Any Difference Between Friends":Dealing with Difference in Some Olive Schreiner Franchise Letters' Auto/Biography Conference on Radical Lives and Works 1855–1920”. University of Manchester.
44. Stanley, Liz. 2002d. “Great is Silence… One May Injure a Fellow Human:Speaking Silence and the Im/personal One in Olive Schreiner's Letters. Plenary Session on Letters as / not a genre' with Margaretta Jolly, Auto/Biography Conference on Yours Sincerely? Letter Writing As An Auto/Biographical Genre”. University of Manchester.
45. Stanley, Liz. 2004. The Epistolarium:On Theorizing Letters and Correspondences. Auto/Biography, 12:201–35.
46. Woolf, Virginia. 1940. The Humane Art. New Statesman and Nation, 8 June:726
47. Woolf, Virginia. 1979. “Olive Schreiner”. In Women and Writing, 180–3. London:The Women's Press.
48. Woolf, Virginia. 1975. The Letters of Virginia Woolf, Edited by:Nigel, Nicholson. London:Chatto & Windus. 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 6 volumes