Modeling the control of attention in visual workspaces

Human Factors

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 142-153

  Steelman, Kelly S ^a   McCarley, Jason S ^a   Wickens, Christopher D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

display design; models of attention; visual attention

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL DATA; COLOR SIMILARITY; DISPLAY CONFIGURATIONS; DISPLAY DESIGNS; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATORS; INTEGRATED ELEMENTS; MISS-RATE; MODELS OF ATTENTION; NEW MODEL; OVERT ATTENTION; PARAMETER VALUES; RECOMMENDED PRACTICE; RESPONSE TIME; SCANNING DATA; STEADY-STATE DISTRIBUTIONS; SUBJECT MATTERS; TASK DEMAND; TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL ATTENTION; VISUAL NOISE; VISUAL WARNINGS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AVIATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS; VISION;

ATTENTION; AVIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79956372941     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720811404026     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Atchley P., Dressel J.. Conversation limits the functional field of view. Human Factors. 2004 ; 46: 664-673 (Pubitemid 40179363)
2. Ballard D. H., Hayhoe M. M., Pelz J. B.. Memory representations in natural tasks. Cognitive Neuroscience. 1995 ; 7: 66-80
3. Bundesen C.. Visual attention: Race models for selection from multielement displays. Psychological Research. 1987 ; 49: 113-121
4. Bundesen C.. A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review. 1990 ; 97: 523-547
5. Bundesen C.. The relationship between independent race models and Luce's choice axiom. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1993 ; 37: 446-471
6. Carbonell J. R., Ward J. L., Senders J. W.. A queuing model of visual sampling experimental validation. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems. 1968 ; MMS-9: 82-87
7. Chan A. H. S., Courtney A. J.. Foveal acuity, peripheral acuity, and search performance: A review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 1996 ; 18: 113-119 (Pubitemid 26292660)
8. Final Report A-0-22 CENIPA/2008. Brasilia, Brazil: CENIPA (Centro de Investigação e Prevenção de Acidentes Aeronáuticos) ; 2006 :
9. Davies C., Tompkinson W., Donnelly N., Gordon L., Cave K.. Visual saliency as an aid to updating digital maps. Computers in Human Behavior. 2006 ; 22: 672-684 (Pubitemid 43267487)
10. Folk C. L., Remington R. W., Johnston J. C.. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1992 ; 18: 1030-1044
11. Gijsenij A., Gevers T., Lucassen M. P. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Marseille, France: Springer ; 2008: 208-221.
12. Horrey W., Wickens C., Consalus K.. Modeling drivers' visual attentional allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2006 ; 12: 67-78 (Pubitemid 44128291)
13. Itti L., Koch C.. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research. 2000 ; 40: 1489-1506 (Pubitemid 30216462)
14. Klein R. M., MacInnes W. J.. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science. 1999 ; 10: 346-352
15. Luce R. D. Individual choice behavior. New York, NY: Wiley ; 1959 :
16. Mack A., Rock I. Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ; 1998 :
17. McCarley J. S., Kramer A. F. Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. Rizzo M. Parasuraman R., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press ; 2006: 95-112.
18. Moray N. Handbook of perception and human performance. Boff K. R. Kaufman L. Thomas J. P., ed. New York, NY: Wiley ; 1986: 40.1-40.51.
19. Most S. B., Scholl B. J., Clifford E. R., Simons D. J.. What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review. 2005 ; 112: 217-242 (Pubitemid 40131526)
20. Most S. B., Simons D. J., Scholl B. J., Jimenez R., Clifford E., Chabris C. F.. How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science. 2001 ; 12: 9-17 (Pubitemid 33614979)
21. Navalpakkam V., Itti L.. Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research. 2005 ; 45: 205-231 (Pubitemid 39575753)
22. Nikolic M. I., Orr J. M., Sarter N. B.. Why pilots miss the green box: How display context undermines attention capture. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2004 ; 14: 39-52 (Pubitemid 38203195)
23. Parkhurst D., Law K., Niebur E.. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research. 2002 ; 42: 107-123 (Pubitemid 34135927)
24. Pringle H. L., Irwin D. E., Kramer A. F., Atchley P.. The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2001 ; 8: 89-95 (Pubitemid 33604158)
25. Rayner K.. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin. 1998 ; 124: 372-422 (Pubitemid 128461792)
26. Sarter N. B., Mumaw R., Wickens C. D.. Pilots monitoring strategies and performance on highly automated glass cockpit aircraft. Human Factors. 2007 ; 49: 347-357
27. Schutte P. C., Trujillo A. C.. Flight crew task management in non-normal situations. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ; 1996 ; 1996. 244.
28. Senders J. W. Visual sampling processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ; 1983 :
29. Sheridan T.. On how often the supervisor should sample. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics. 1970 ; SSC-6: 140-145
30. Simons D. J., Chabris C. F.. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception. 1999 ; 28: 1059-1074
31. SAE ARP-4102/4: Flight deck alerting systems. Warrendale, PA: Author ; 2007 :
32. Steelman-Allen K. S., McCarley J. S., Wickens C., Sebok A., Bzostek J.. N-SEEV: A computational model of attention and noticing. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting ; 2009 ; 2009. 774.
33. Sun Y., Fisher R., Wang F., Gomes H. M.. A computer vision model for visual-object-based attention and eye movements. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 2008 ; 112: 126-142
34. Walther D., Koch C.. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Networks. 2006 ; 19: 1395-1407 (Pubitemid 44708603)
35. Wickens C., McCarley J., Sebok A., Steelman-Allen K., Sarter N., Bzostek J.. NT-SEEV: A model of attention capture and noticing on the flight deck. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting ; 2009 ; 2009. 769.
36. Wickens C. D., Alexander A. L.. Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2009 ; 19: 1-17
37. Wickens C. D., Goh J., Helleberg J., Horrey W., Talleur D. A.. Attentional models of multi-task pilot performance using advanced display technology. Human Factors. 2003 ; 45: 360-380 (Pubitemid 37509590)
38. Wickens C. D., Hooey B. L., Gore B. F., Sebok A., Koenicke C. S.. Identifying black swans in NextGen: Predicting human performance in off-nominal conditions. Human Factors. 2009 ; 51: 638-651
39. Wickens C. D., McCarley J. S. Applied attention theory. Boca-Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis ; 2008 :
40. Wickens C. D., McCarley J. S., Alexander A. L., Thomas L. C., Ambinder M., Zheng S. Human performance modeling in aviation. Foyle D. C. Hooey B. L., ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis ; 2008: 213-239.
41. Wolfe J. M.. Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1994 ; 1: 202-238
42. Wolfe J. M. Integrated models of cognitive systems. Gray W., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press ; 2007: 99-119.
43. Yantis S., Jonides J.. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1990 ; 16: 121-134