Integrating subgrid connectivity properties of the micro-topography in distributed runoff models, at the interrill scale

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 403, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 213-223

  Antoine, Michael ^a   Javaux, Mathieu ^a,b   Bielders, Charles L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Depression storage; Grid scale modeling; Runoff; Surface detention; Upscaling

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; DEPRESSION STORAGE; GRID-SCALE MODELING; SURFACE DETENTION; UPSCALING;

DISEASES; PRECISION ENGINEERING; SCALES (WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS); TOPOGRAPHY;

RUNOFF;

CONNECTIVITY; HYDROGRAPH; MICROTOPOGRAPHY; OVERLAND FLOW; RUNOFF; UPSCALING; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 79956356701     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.027     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abedini M.J., Dickinson W.T., Rudra R.P. On depressional storages: the effect of dem spatial resolution. J. Hydrol. 2006, 318:138-150.
2. Ali G., Roy A. Revisiting hydrologic sampling strategies for an accurate assessment of hydrologic connectivity in humid temperate systems. Geogr. Compass 2009, 3(1):350-374.
3. Antoine M., Javaux M., Bielders C. What indicators can capture runoff-relevant connectivity properties of the micro-topography at the plot scale?. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32(8):1297-1310.
4. Antoine, M., Javaux, M., Bielders, C., 2011. Estimating changes in effective values of surface detention, depression storage and friction factor at the interrill scale, using a cheap and fast method to mold the soil surface micro-topography. Catena, in press.
5. Bonilla C.A., Molling J.M., Christine C. Water erosion estimation in topographically complex landscapes: model description and first verifications. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2007, 71:1524-1537.
6. Bracken L.J., Croke J. The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff-dominated geomorphic systems. Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21:1749-1763.
7. Darboux F., Huang C. An instantaneous-profile laser scanner to measure soil surface microtopography. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2003, 67:92-99.
8. Darboux F., Davy P., Gascuel-Odoux C., Huang C. Evolution of soil surface roughness and flowpath connectivity in overland flow experiments. Catena 2002, 46:125-139.
9. Darboux F., Davy P., Gascuel-Odoux C. Effect of depression storage capacity on overland-flow generation for rough horizontal surfaces: Water transfer distance and scaling. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 2002, 27:177-191.
10. Dunkerley D.L. Determining friction coefficients for interrill flows: the significance of flow filaments and backwater effects. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 2003, 28:475-491.
11. Esteves M., Faucher X., Galle S., Vauclin M. Overland flow and infiltration modelling for small plots during unsteady rain: numerical results versus observed values. J. Hydrol. 2000, 228:265-282.
12. Fox D.M., Le Bissonnais Y., Bruand A. The effect of ponding depth on infiltration in a crusted surface depression. Catena 1998, 32:87-100.
13. Frey M.P., Schneider M.K., Dietzel A., Reichert P., Stamm C. Predicting critical source areas for diffuse herbicide losses to surface waters: role of connectivity and boundary conditions. J. Hydrol. 2009, 365:23-36.
14. Fryirs K.A., Brierley G.J., Preston N.J., Kasai M. Buffers, barriers and blankets: the (dis)connectivity of catchment-scale sediment cascades. Catena 2007, 70:49-67.
15. Gilley J.E., Finkner S.C. Hydraulic roughness coefficients as affected by random roughness. T. Asae 1991, 34:897-903.
16. Grayson R.B., Bloschl G., Western A.W., McMahon T.A. Advances in the use of observed spatial patterns of catchment hydrological response. Adv. Water Resour. 2002, 25:1313-1334.
17. Henderson F.M. Open Channel Flow (Macmillan Series in Civil Engineering) 1966, Prentice Hall.
18. Jencso K.G., McGlynn B.L., Gooseff M.N., Wondzell S.M., Bencala K.E., Marshall L.A. Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: transferring reach- and plot-scale understanding to the catchment scale. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45:W04,42.
19. Kamphorst E.C., Jetten V., Guerif J., Pitkanen J., Iversen B.V., Douglas J.T., Paz A. Predicting depressional storage from soil surface roughness. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64:1749-1758.
20. Knudby C., Carrera J. On the relationship between indicators of geostatistical, flow and transport connectivity. Adv. Water Resour. 2005, 28:405-421.
21. Lane S.N., Reaney S.M., Heathwaite A.L. Representation of landscape hydrological connectivity using a topographically driven surface flow index. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45:W08423.
22. Langhans C., Govers G., Diels J., Leys A., Clymans W., Van den Putte J., Valckx A. Experimental rainfall-runoff data: Reconsidering the concept of infiltration capacity. J. Hydrol. 2011, 399:255-262.
23. Linsley R.K., Kohler M.A., Paulhus J.L. Applied Hydrology 1949, McGraw-Hill, New York.
24. Meerkerk A.L., van Wesemael B., Bellin N. Application of connectivity theory to model the impact of terrace failure on runoff in semi-arid catchments. Hydrol. Process. 2009, 23:2792-2803.
25. Michaelides K., Chapell A. Connectivity as a concept for characterising hydrological behaviour. Hydrol. Process. 2009, 23:517522.
26. Milzow C., Kinzelbach W. Impact of connectivity on the modeling of overland flow within semiarid shrubland environments. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46:W10521.
27. Mueller E.N., Wainwright J., Parsons A.J. Impact of connectivity on the modeling of overland flow within semiarid shrubland environments. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W0941.
28. Mwendera E.J., Feyen J. Estimation of depression-storage and manning resistance coefficient from random roughness measurements. Geoderma 1992, 52:235-250.
29. Nash J., Sutcliffe J. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part i - a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10(3):282-290.
30. Ocampo C.J., Sivapalan M., Oldham C. Hydrological connectivity of upland-riparian zones in agricultural catchments: implications for runoff generation and nitrate transport. J. Hydrol. 2006, 331:643-658.
31. Reaney S.M., Bracken L.J., Kirkby M.J. Use of the connectivity of runoff model (CRUM) to investigate the influence of storm characteristics on runoff generation and connectivity in semi-arid areas. Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21:894906.
32. Singh, V.P., 1995. Computer models of watershed hydrology, pp. xiv+1130 pp.
33. Singh, V.P., Frevert, D., 2002. Mathematical models of small watershed hydrology and applications. Mathematical models of small watershed hydrology and applications, pp. xxi+950 pp.
34. Smart G.M., Duncan M.J., Walsh J.M. Relatively rough flow resistance equations. J. Hydraul. Eng.-Asce 2002, 128:568-578.
35. Smith M.W., Cox N.J., Bracken L.J. Applying flow resistance equations to overland flows. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2007, 31:363-387.
36. Tatard L., Planchon O., Wainwright J., Nord G., Favis-Mortlock D., Silvera N., Ribolzi O., Esteves M., Huang C.H. Measurement and modelling of high-resolution flow-velocity data under simulated rainfall on a low-slope sandy soil. J. Hydrol. 2008, 348:1-12.
37. Trinchero P., Sanchez-Vila X., Fernandez-Garcia K. Point-to-point connectivity, an abstract concept or a key issue for risk assessment studies?. Adv. Water Resour. 2008, 31:1742-1753.
38. Vogel, H.J., 2002. Topological characterization of porous media, Morphology of Condensed Matter. Physics and Geometry of Spatially Complex Systems. In: 2nd International Workshop 'Statistical Physics and Spatial Statistics', pp. 75-92 - xviii+439.
39. Vogel H.J., Roth K. Quantitative morphology and network representation of soil pore structure. Adv. Water Resour. 2001, 24:233-242.
40. Western A.W., Bloschl G., Grayson R.B. Toward capturing hydrologically significant connectivity in spatial patterns. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37:83-97.
41. Zinn B., Harvey C.F. When good statistical models of aquifer heterogeneity go bad: a comparison of flow, dispersion, and mass transfer in connected and multivariate gaussian hydraulic conductivity fields. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39:1051-1070.