Postoperative follow-up strategy in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 69, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Sasaki, Masashi ^a   Aoki, Takayuki ^a   Karakida, Kazunari ^a   Otsuru, Mitsunobu ^a   Takahashi, Miho ^a   Akamatsu, Tadashi ^a   Sakamoto, Haruo ^a   Ota, Yoshihide ^a  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RELAPSE; CANCER SURVIVAL; DISTANT METASTASIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SECOND CANCER; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; SURVIVAL RATE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79956345665     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: 15315053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.039     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Merkx MA, van Gulick JJ, Marres HA, et al: Effectiveness of routine follow-up of patients treated for T1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinomas of the floor of mouth and tongue. Head Neck 28:1, 2006
2. Ritoe SC, Krabbe PF, Kaanders JH, et al: Value of routine follow-up for patients cured of laryngeal carcinoma. Cancer 101:1382, 2004
3. Haas I, Hauser U, Ganzer U: The dilemma of follow-up in head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:177, 2001
4. Cooney TR, Poulsen MG: Is routine follow-up useful after combined-modality therapy for advanced head and neck cancer? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:379, 1999
5. de Visscher AV, Manni JJ: Routine long-term follow-up in patients treated with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity. Does it make sense? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:934, 1994
6. Snow GB: Follow-up in patients treated for head and neck cancer: How frequent, how thorough and for how long? Eur J Cancer 28:315, 1992
7. Boysen M, Lövdal O, Tausjö J, Winther F: The value of follow-up in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer 28:426, 1992
8. Yuasa K, Kawazu T, Kunitake N, et al: Sonography for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases among patients with tongue cancer: Criteria for early detection and assessment of follow-up examination intervals. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1127, 2000
9. Myers JN, Greenberg JS, Mo V, et al: Extracapsular spread. A significant predictor of treatment failure in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Cancer 92:3030, 2001
10. Woolgar JA, Rogers SN, Lowe D, et al: Cervical lymph node metastasis in oral cancer: The importance of even microscopic extracapsular spread. Oral Oncol 39:130, 2003
11. Eida S, Sumi M, Yonetsu K, et al: Combination of helical CT and Doppler sonography in the follow-up of patients with clinical N0 stage neck disease and oral cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:312, 2003
12. Walther EK, Dahlmann N, Gorgulla HT: Tumor markers in the diagnosis and follow-up of head and neck cancer: Role of CEA, CA 19-9, SCC, TK, and dTTPase. Head Neck 15:230, 1993
13. Tepperman BS, Fitzpatrick PJ: Second respiratory and upper digestive tract cancers after oral cancer. Lancet 2:547, 1981
14. Vikram B, Strong EW, Shah JP, et al: Second malignant neoplasms in patients successfully treated with multimodality treatment for advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck Surg 6:734, 1984
15. Gao X, Fisher SG, Mohideen N, et al: Second primary cancers in patients with laryngeal cancer: A population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:427, 2003