Regeneration model of Taiwan old urban centers - A research framework of a performance evaluation system for a livable urban district

Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 163-170

  Cheng, Hsienhsin ^a   Lin, Chaochih ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

A framework of indicator system; A livable urban district; Analytic hierarchy process; Urban village

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LAND USE; SURVEYS;

A LIVABLE URBAN DISTRICT; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); ARCHITECTURAL TYPOLOGIES; INDICATOR SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS; TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT; URBAN VILLAGE;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 79956329879     PISSN: 13467581     EISSN: 13472852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3130/jaabe.10.163     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barton, Hugh et al. (2003), Shaping Neighborhoods: A Guide for Health, Sustainability and Vitality, Spon Press.
2. Burton, E. (2002), Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 29, pp.219-250.
3. Calthorpe, Peter (1993), the Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
4. Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. (2006), Balance growth, travel demand and physical activity, University of California Transportation Center.
5. Charles, Prince of Wales (1989), A Vision of Britain: a personal view of architecture /HRH the Prince of Wales, London: Doubleday.
6. Department of the Environment (DOE) (1997) PPG1: General Policies and Proposals, London: DOE.
7. Gans, H.J. (1962), the urban villagers: group and class in the life of Italian-Americans, Free Press of Glencoe.
8. Hemphill, L., Mcgreal, S. and Berry, J. (2004), An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 2, Empirical Evaluation and Case-study Analysis, Urban Studies, 41(4): 725-755, 757-772.
9. Hoppenbrouwer, E. and Louw. E. (2005), Mixed-use Development: Theory and Practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Docklands, European Planning Studies, 13(7): 967-983.
10. Huang, W.D. (2000), The Enacting Progress of City planning for Taiwan in Japanese Colonial Age, 1895-1945, Taipei: Taiwan Urban History Research Lab.
11. Ishikawa A, Amagasa M. et al. (1993) The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method via Fuzzy Integration, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol.5, pp.241-253.
12. Jacobs, J. (1961), the Death and Life of Great American Cities, the Modern Library.
13. Jacobs, A. B. and Appleyard, D. (1987), Toward an Urban Design Manifesto, American Planning Association Journal, 53(1): 113-120.
14. Klir G. J., Yuan B., (1995), Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic-Theory and Application, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
15. Lee, C. Y. (2004), Research for Mass Control of Building Renovation in Tainan City Historical Central District, A Case of five-watercourse area, Dept. of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University.
16. Lynch K. (1987), Good City Form, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England.
17. Neal, Peter (2003), Urban Villages and the Making of Communities, Spon Press.
18. Punter, J. (1990), The Ten Commandments of Architectural and Urban Design, The Planner, 76(39): 10-14.
19. R. Ramanathan, 2001, A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 63, pp.27-35.
20. Ratcliff, R. U. (1949), Urban Land Economics, New York: McGraw Hill.
21. Rogers, R. (1999), towards an urban renaissance, Final report of the Urban Task Force, London: Spon Press.
22. Saaty, T. L. (2000), Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy.
23. Process. Pittsburg: RWS Publications.
24. Schurch, T.W. (1999), Reconsidering Urban Design, Journal of Urban Design, 4(1): 5-28.
25. Talen, E. (2003), Measuring Urbanism: Issues in Smart Growth Research, Journal of Urban Design, 8(3): 195-215.
26. Tsai, S.H. et al. (2001.6) Urban Development and Urban Renewal, Sustainable Research No.090-015.
27. th National Land Planning Forum.
28. Taiwan Urban Development and Building Management related articles: Urban Renewal Act #4, #6, and #22; Building Act #42 and #48; Building Technical Regulations #164; Taipei County Illegal building report principles #4; Firefighting trucks spatial requirement principles.