Discussion of "effects of temporal resolution on hydrological model parameters and its impact on prediction of river discharge"

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 521-524

  Littlewood, Ian G ^a   Croke, Barry F W ^b   Young, Peter C ^c,d,e  

^a Didcot   (United Kingdom)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PREDICTION; RIVER DISCHARGE;

EID: 79956325331     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2011.565769     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Jakeman, A. J. & Hornberger, G. M. (1993) How much complexity is needed in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resour. Res. 29, 2637-2649.
2. Jakeman, A. J., Littlewood, I. G. & Whitehead, P. G. (1990) Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments. J. Hydrol. 117, 275-300.
3. Littlewood, I. G. (2007). Rainfall-streamflow models for ungauged basins: uncertainty due to modelling time-step. In: Uncertainties in the 'Monitoring-Conceptualisation-Modelling' Sequence of Catchment Research (L. Pfister & L. Hoffmann, eds.), 149-155. Proc. Eleventh Biennial Conference of the Euromediterranean Network of Experimental and Representative Basins, UNESCO Technical Documents in Hydrology Series no. 81.
4. Littlewood, I. G. (2010) Catchment-scale rainfall-streamflow modelling: utility versus process understanding. In: Status and Perspectives of Hydrology in Small Basins (Proc. Int. Workshop) (A. Herrmann, S. Schumann, L. Holko, I. Littlewood, L. Pfister, P. Warmerdam & U. Schröder, eds), 257-263. Wallingford: IAHS Press, IAHS Publ. 336.
5. Littlewood, I. G. & Croke, B. F. W. (2008) Data time-step dependency of conceptual rainfall-streamflow model parameters: an empirical study with implications for regionalisation. Hydrol. Sci. J. 53(4), 685-695.
6. Littlewood, I. G., Young, P. C. & Croke, B. F. W. (2010) Preliminary comparison of two methods for identifying rainfall-streamflow model parameters insensitive to data time-step: the Wye at Cefn Brwyn, Plynlimon, Wales. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium (British Hydrological Society, 19-23 July 2010, Newcastle University, UK). http://www.ceg.ncl.ac.uk/bhs2010/ (PDF file pages 539-543).
7. Ostrowski, M., Bach, M., Gamerith, V. & De Simone, S. (2010) Analysis of the time-step dependency of parameters in conceptual hydrological models. Darmstadt, Germany: Report, Department for Engineering Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Darmstadt University, http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/2099/.
8. Wang, Y., He, B. & Takase, K. (2009) Effects of temporal resolution on hydrological model parameters and its impact on prediction of river discharge. Hydrol. Sci. J. 54(5), 886-898.
9. Young, P. C. (2010) The estimation of continuous-time rainfall- flow models for flood risk management. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium (British Hydrological Society, 19-23 July 2010, Newcastle University, UK). http://www.ceg.ncl.ac.uk/bhs2010/, (PDF file pages 303-310).
10. Young, P. C. & Garnier, H. (2006) Identification and estimation of continuous-time, data-based mechanistic (DBM) models for environmental systems. Environ. Model. Software 21, 1055-1072.
11. Young, P. C. & Romanowicz, R. (2004) PUB and data-based mechanistic modelling: the importance of parsimonious continuous-time models. In: Complexity and Integrated Resources Management (Trans. Second Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, iEMSs, Manno, Switzerland, 2004) (C. Pahl-Wostl, S. Schmidt, A. E. Rizzoli & A. J. Jakeman, eds), vol. 3, 1141-1146. ISBN 88-900787-1-5. http://www.iemss.org/.