Policy issues of the international productivity and visibility of the social sciences in central and Eastern European countries;Problemi javnih politika prema medunarodnoj produktivnosti i vidljivosti društvenih znanosti u zemljama Srednje i Istočne Evrope

Sociologija i Prostor

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 415-435

  Mali, Franc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Co authorship; International productivity and visibility; Peer review; Publications; R D evaluation system; Social sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956318171     PISSN: 18465226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Archambault, E.; Etienne, V.; Cote, G.; Lariviere, V.; and Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities. The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68 (3):329-342.
2. Biagioli, M. (1999). Aporias of Scientific Authorship. Credit and Responsibility in Contemporary Biomedicine, in: Biagioli, M. (Ed.). The Science Studies Reader. New York, London: Routledge.
3. Braun, D. (1997). Die politische Steuerung der Wissenschaf. Frankfurt-New York: Campus Verlag.
4. Braun-Munzinger, P. (2009). Das Publikationsverhalten in Grosskollaborationen, in: Stefan Hornbostel et al. (Ed.). Publikationsverhalten in unterschiedlichen wissenschaft-lichen Disziplinen. Beitraege zur Beurteilung von Forschungsleistungen. Band 12, Berlin: Alexander von Humboldt Verlag.
5. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship. A Postmodern Perversion or Evidence of a Structural Shift in Scholarly Communication Practices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (7):558-569.
7. Dyker, D. A. and Perrin J. (1997). Technology policy and industrial objectives in the context of economic transition, in: Dyker, D. A. (Ed.). The Technology of Transition-Science and Technology Policies for Transition Countries. Budapest: Central European University Press.
8. EU Science, Technology and Competitiveness Key Figures Report (2009). A more research intensive and integrated European Research Area. Brussellss: European Commission. Read on 30. December 2010. (http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/pdf/key-figures-report2008-2009).
9. Felt U. (Ed.) (2009). Knowing and Living in Academic Research. Convergence and heterogeneity i research cultures in the European context. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Science of the Czech Republic.
10. Frankel, S. M. and Cave, J. (1997). Introduction, in: Frankel, S. and Cave, J. (Eds.). Evaluating Science and Scientists. An East-West Dialogue on Research Evaluation in Post-Communist Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
11. GESIS (2010). Knowledge Base. Social Science Eastren Europe. Leibnitz Institute for Social Sciences. Read on 29. December 2010. (http://www.cee-socialscience.net/journals).
12. Gossart, C. and Ozmean, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences. Scientometrics, 78 (2):323-345.
13. Hemlin, S. (1996). Research on research evaluation. Social Epistemology, 10 (2):209-250.
14. Hicks, D. (2004). The Four Literatures of Social Sciences, in: Moed, H. F.; Glaenzel, W. and Schmoch, U. (Eds.). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty in achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44 (2):193-215.
16. Hoekman, J.; Koen, F. and Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39 (5):662-673.
17. Holm, P.; Guilhot, N.; Dumitrescu, D.; Griffin, G.; Jarrick, A.; Rév, I.; Roll, G.; Smilov, D.; Sztompka, P.; Thys-Clement, F.; Tsakloglou, P.; Langenhove, L. and Wolf, G. (2009). Emerging Trends in Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities in Europe. The Metrics Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
18. Hornbostel, S. (1997). Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag GMbH.
19. Kaufmann, A. and Kasztler, A. (2009). Diffrences in publication and dissemination practices between disciplinary and transdisciplinary science and the consequences for research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 215-227.
20. Koen, F.; Hoekman, J.; Kok, S.; Pons, R.; Van Oort, F. and VanVliet, J. (2009). Deat of Distance in Science? A Gravity Approach to Research Collaboration, in: Pyka, A. and Scharnhorst, A. (Eds). Innovation Networks. New Approach in Modelling and Analzing. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer Verlag.
21. Kovacs, I. and Taras, D. (2010). Conclusion. Internationalisation of Central and Eastern European social sciences-is the catching up a myth or reality?, in: Kovacs, I. and Taras, D. (Eds.). Internationalisation of Social Sciences in Central and Eastern Europe. The catching up-a myth or a strategy?. London and New York: Routledge.
22. Kramberger, A. and Mali, F. (2010). An evaluation system of the science and international orientation of social scientists: The case of Slovenia, in: Kovacs, I. and Taras, D. (Eds.). Internationalisation of Social Sciences in Central and Eastern Europe. The catching up-a myth or a strategy?. London and New York: Routledge.
23. Lambiotte, R. and Panzarasa, P. (2009). Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. Journal of informetrics, 3 (3):180-190.
24. Lee, S and Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35 (5):673-702.
25. Lukkonen, T.; Persson, O. and Siversten, G. (1992). Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17 (1):101-126.
26. Mali, F. (2003). Sociology in Slovenia. The challenge of transition, in: Keen, M. F. and Mucha, J. (Eds.). Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe: transformation at the dawn of a new millenium. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
27. Mali, F.; Kronegger, L. and Ferligoj, A. (2010). Co-authorship trends and collaboration patterns in the Slovenian sociological community. Corvinus journal of sociology and social policy, 1 (2):29-50.
28. Mali, F. (2010). Turning Science Transdisciplinarity: Is it Possible for the New Concept of Cross-Disciplinary Cooperations to Enter Slovenian Science and Policy, in: Mueller K. H. et al. (Eds.). Modern RISC-Societies. Towards a New Paradigm for Societal Evolution. Wien: Echoraum.
29. Mark S. F. and Cave, J. (1997). Evaluating Science and Scientists. An East-West Dial-ogoue on Research Evaluation in Post-Communist Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
30. Mattsson, P.; Laget, P.; Nilsson, A. and Sundberg C. J. (2008). Intra-EU vs. extra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU. Scientometrics, 75 (3):555-574.
31. METRIS (2010): Monitoring European Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities. European Commission. DG-Research. Read on 14. December 2010. (http://www.metrisnet.eu/metris)
32. Mirskaya, E. (1998). From East To West. New Patterns of International Relations of Research, in: Maynetz, R.; Schimank, U. and Weingart, P. (Eds.). East European Academies in Transition. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. Mucha, J. and Forrest, K. (2003). Central and Eastern Europe and Its Sociology at the Beginning of the Post-Communist Era, in: Keen, M. F. and Mucha, J. (Eds.). Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe: transformation at the dawn of a new millenium. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
34. Must, U. (2006). "New" countries in Europe-Research, development and innovation strategies vs bibliometric data. Scientometrics, 66 (2):241-248.
35. Noyonsed, M. and Calero-Medina, C. (2009). Applying bibliometric mapping in a high level science policy context. Scientometrics, 79 (2):261-275.
36. Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Price, D. S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science and Beyond. Columbia University Press: New York.
38. Prpić, K. (2007). Changes of scientific knowledge production and research productivity in a transitional society. Scientometrics, 72 (3):487-511.
39. Sambunjak, D.; Ivanis, A.; Marusic, A. and Marusic, M. (2008). Representation of journals from five neighboring European countries in the Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics, 76 (2):261-271.
40. SCImago (2010). SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Read on 28. December 2010. (http://www.scimagojr.com)
41. Schiermeier, Q. (2008). Westernizing Eastern-bloc science. Nature Biotechnology, 26 (8):949-950.
42. Van der Meulen, B. (2003). New roles and strategies of a research council. Intermediation of the principal-agent relationship. Science and Public Policy, 30 (5):323-336.
43. Wagner, C. and Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and he growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy. 34 (10):1608-1618.
44. Wagner, C. (2005). Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Sciento-metrics, 62 (1):3-26.
45. Whitley, R. (2007). Changing Governance of The Public Science, in: Glaeser, J. and Whitley, R. (Eds.). The Changing Governance of the Science. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
46. Wuchty, S.; Benjamin, J. and Brian, J. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316 (5827):1036-1039.
47. Ziman, J. (1994). Prometheus Bound. Science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.