Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: Usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging - phantom and clinical studies

Radiology

Volumn 259, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 885-893

  Cha, Jang Gyu ^a   Jin, Wook ^b   Lee, Min Hee ^a   Kim, Dong Hoon ^a   Park, Jai Soung ^a   Shin, Won Han ^a   Yi, Boem Ha ^a  

^a Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Kyung Hee University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM EDETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPINE SURGERY; VERTEBRAL CANAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTERNAL FIXATORS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINE; TITANIUM;

EID: 79956302850     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101856     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rutherford EE, Tarplett LJ, Davies EM, Harley JM, King LJ. Lumbar spine fusion and stabilization: hardware, techniques, and imaging appearances. RadioGraphics 2007;27(6):1737-1749.
2. Petersilge CA, Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Yoo JU, Ghaneyem AJ. Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(5):1213-1218. (Pubitemid 26122975)
3. Gerdes CM, Kijowski R, Reeder SB. IDEAL imaging of the musculoskeletal system: robust water fat separation for uniform fat suppression, marrow evaluation, and cartilage imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(5):W284-W291.
4. Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vinitski S, Friedman DP. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 1994;190(2):565-569. (Pubitemid 24044271)
5. Chang SD, Lee MJ, Munk PL, Janzen DL, MacKay A, Xiang QS. MRI of spinal hardware: comparison of conventional T1-weighted sequence with a new metal artifact reduction sequence. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30(4):213-218. (Pubitemid 32396703)
6. Reeder SB, Pineda AR, Wen Z, et al. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spinecho imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;54(3):636-644. (Pubitemid 41233758)
7. Reeder SB, Wen Z, Yu H, et al. Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method. Magn Reson Med 2004;51(1):35-45. (Pubitemid 38095700)
8. Siepmann DB, McGovern J, Brittain JH, Reeder SB. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(6):1510-1515. (Pubitemid 350174823)
9. Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26(2):375-385. (Pubitemid 47257737)
10. Meyer JM, Buecker A, Schuermann K, Ruebben A, Guenther RW. MR evaluation of stent patency: in vitro test of 22 metallic stents and the possibility of determining their patency by MR angiography. Invest Radiol 2000;35(12):739-746. (Pubitemid 32039037)
11. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
12. Lee MJ, Kim S, Lee SA, et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. RadioGraphics 2007;27(3):791-803.
13. Eggers G, Rieker M, Kress B, Fiebach J, Dickhaus H, Hassfeld S. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. MAGMA 2005;18(2):103-111. (Pubitemid 40767701)
14. Guermazi A, Miaux Y, Zaim S, Peterfy CG, White D, Genant HK. Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. Clin Radiol 2003;58(4):322-328. (Pubitemid 36416977)
15. Viano AM, Gronemeyer SA, Haliloglu M, Hoffer FA. Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18(3):287-295. (Pubitemid 30220703)
16. Bydder GM, Steiner RE, Blumgart LH, Khenia S, Young IR. MR imaging of the liver using short TI inversion recovery sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9(6):1084-1089. (Pubitemid 16202706)
17. Lee MJ, Janzen DL, Munk PL, MacKay A, Xiang QS, McGowen A. Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30(7):398-401. (Pubitemid 32677724)
18. White LM, Buckwalter KA. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6(1):5-17. (Pubitemid 34258306)
19. Bobman SA, Atlas SW, Listerud J, Grossman RI. Postoperative lumbar spine:contrast-enhanced chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology 1991;179(2):557-562.
20. Reeder SB, Yu H, Johnson JW, et al. T1- and T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging of the brachial plexus and cervical spine with IDEAL water-fat separation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24(4):825-832. (Pubitemid 44546994)