Trust as situated cognition: An ecological perspective on trust decisions

Handbook of Trust Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 68-84

  Kramer, Roderick M ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956265962     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Allison, S. and Messick, D. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of share resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 195-204.
2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
3. Axelrod, R. and Cohen, M.D. (1999). Harnessing Complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific frontier. New York: Free Press.
4. Bacharach, M. and Gambetta, D. (2001). Trust in signs. In K.S. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society, pp. 148-84. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Bachmann, R. (2001). Trust, power, and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies, 22, 337-65.
6. Barber, B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7. Baumeister, R.F., Stillwell, A. and Wortman, S.R. (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 995-1005.
8. Bendor, J., Kramer, R.M. and Stout, S. (1991). When in doubt: Cooperation in the noisy prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 691-719.
9. Boyle, R. and Bonacich, P. (1970). The development of trust and mistrust in mixed-motive games. Sociometry, 33, 123-39.
10. Brockner, J. and Siegel, P. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural justice and distributive justice: The role of trust. In R.M. Kramer and T. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, pp. 390-413. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Brothers, D. (1995). Falling Backwards: An exploration of trust and self-experience. New York: Norton.
12. Burt, R.S. (2003). Trust, Reputation, and Competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Clases, C., Bachmann, R. and Wehner, T. (2003). Studying trust in virtual organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33, 7-27.
14. Cook, K.S., Kramer, R.M., Thom, D.H., Stepanikova, I., Mollborn, S.B. and Cooper, R.M. (2004). Trust and distrust in patient-physician relationships: Perceived determinants of high- and low-trust relationships in managed care settings. In R.M. Kramer and K.S. Cook (eds), Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and approaches, pp. 65-98. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15. Dawes, R.M. (2001). Everyday Irrationality: How pseudo-scientists, lunatics, and the rest of us systematically fail to think rationally. Boulder, CO: Westview.
16. Falcone, R., Singh, M. and Tan, Y.H. (2001). Trust in Cyber-societies: Integrating the human and artificial perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. Fine, G. and Holyfield, L. (1996). Secrecy, trust, and dangerous leisure: Generating group cohesion in voluntary organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 22-38.
18. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
19. Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relationships, pp. 213-37. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
20. Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Gigerenzer, G. and Todd, P.M. (1999). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Gilovich, T. (1991). How We Know What Isn't So: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press.
23. Hardin, R. (2001). Conceptions and explanations of trust. In. K.S. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society, pp. 3-39. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24. Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25. Heimer, C.A. (2001). Solving the problem of trust. In K.S. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society, pp. 40-88. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26. Henslin, J.M. (1968). Trust and the cab driver. In M. Truzzi (ed.), Sociology and Everyday Life, pp. 138-58. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U. and Martignon, L. (1999). Quick estimation: Letting the environment do the work. In G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd and the ABC Research Group (eds). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, pp. 191-208. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Hogarth, R.M. (1981). Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 197-217.
29. Hollis, M. (1999). Trust within Reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered Assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.
31. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kanter, R. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
33. Kanter, D.L. and Mirvis, P.H. (1989). The Cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34. Kollock, P. (1993). An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind: Cooperation and accounting systems. American Sociological Review, 100, 313-43.
35. Kramer, R.M. (1996). Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: The intuitive auditor at work. In R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Kramer, R.M. and Cook, K.S. (2004). Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Approaches and dilemmas. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37. Kramer, R., Meyerson, D. and Davis, G. (1990). How much is enough? Psychological components of 'guns versus butter' decisions in a security dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 984-93.
38. Kramer, R.M., Wei, J. and Bendor, J. (2001). Golden rules and leaden worlds: Exploring the limitations of tit-for-tat as a social decision rule. In J. Darley, D.M. Messick and T. Tyler (eds), Social Influence and Ethics, pp. 177-99. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (1998). Trust Within and Between Organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Leavitt, H.J. (2004). Top Down: Why hierarchies are here to stay and how to manage them more effectively. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
41. Lindskold, S. (1978). Trust development, the GRIT proposal, and the effects of conciliatory acts on conflict and cooperation. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 772-93.
42. March, J.G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making. New York: Free Press.
43. March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
44. March, J.G., Schulz, M and Zhou, X. (2000). The Dynamics of Rules: Changes in Written Organizational Codes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45. Messick, D.M. and Kramer, R.M. (2001). Trust as a form of shallow morality. In K.S. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society, pp. 89-118. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46. Messick, D.M., Bloom, S., Boldizer, J.P. and Samuelson, C.D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480-500.
47. Miller, G.J. (1992). Managerial Dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Ostrom, E. and Walker, J. (2003). Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Pearson, S.D. and Raek, L.H. (2000). Patient's trust in physicians: Many theories, few measures, and little data. Journal of General Medicine, 15, 509-13.
50. Pilisuk, M. and Skolnick, P. (1968). Inducing trust: A test of the Osgood proposal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 121-33.
51. Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. In L. Berkowitz (ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press, pp. 131-48.
53. Salancik, G.R. and J. Pfeffer (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quartelry, 22, 224-33.
54. Schwarz, N. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom in feelings. In L.F. Barrett and Peter Salovey (eds), The Wisdom in Feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence, pp. 144-66. New York: Guilford.
55. Seligman, A.B. (1997). The Problem of Trust. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.
56. Simon, H.A. (l957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
57. Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Taylor, S.E. (1991). Positive Illusions. New York: Basic Books.
59. von Winterfeld, D. and Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Wu, J. and Axelrod, R. (1997). Coping with noise: How to cope with noise in the iterated prisoner's dilemma. In R. Axelrod (ed.), The Complexities of Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 30-39.
62. Yamagishi, T. (2001). Trust as a form of social intelligence. In K.S. Cook (ed.), Trust in society, pp. 121-47. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
63. Zebrowitz, L.A. (1997). Reading Faces: Window to the soul? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.