Political issues and the Dynamics of vote choice in 2008

Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 241-269

  Hillygus, D Sunshine ^a   Henderson, Michael ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956247362     PISSN: 17457289     EISSN: 17457297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17457281003697263     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan & Snyder, James M. (2008) The strength of issues: using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting, American Political Science Review, 102, pp. 215-232.
2. Balz, Dan & Johnson, Haynes (2009) The Battle for America 2008: The Story of an Extraordinary Election (New York: Viking Press).
3. Bartels, Larry (2002) Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions, Political Behavior, 24, pp. 117-150.
4. Callegaro, Mario & DiSogra, Charles (2008) Computing response metrics for online panels, Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, pp.1008-1032.
5. Eichenberg, Richard (2009) Foreign policy and gender in the electoral and governing coalition of Barack Obama, Materials for presentation at the Shambaugh Conference on Understanding the 2008 Presidential Election, 5-7 March, Department of Political Science, University of Iowa.
6. Erikson, Robert S. (1989) Economic conditions and the presidential vote, American Political Science Review, 83, pp. 567-573.
7. Finkel, Steven E. (1993) Reexamining the "minimal effects" model in recent presidential elections, Journal of Politics, 55, pp. 1-21.
8. Finkel, Steven E. (1995) Causal Analysis with Panel Data (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
9. Fiorina, Morris (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
10. Gelman, Andrew & Carlin, John (2001) Post-stratification and weighting adjustments, in: Robert M. Groves, Don A. Dillman, John L. Eltinge & Roderick J. A. Little (eds.) Survey Nonresponse (New York: Wiley-Interscience).
11. Holbrook, Thomas (2009) Economic considerations and the 2008 presidential election, PS: Political Science and Politics, 42, pp. 473-478.
12. Jackman, Simon & Vavreck, Lynn (2010) Primary politics: race, gender, and age in the 2008 Democratic primary. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 20, pp. 153-186.
13. Johnston, Richard & Thorson, Emily (2009) The economy, the candidates, and the 2008 campaign, Paper presented at the 2009 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 4 September.
14. Johnston, Richard, Thorson, Emily, & Gooch, Andrew (2010) The economy and the dynamics of the 2008 presidential campaign: evidence from The National Annenberg Election Study, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 20, pp. 271-289.
15. Kramer, Gerald H. (1971) Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior: 1896-1964, American Political Science Review, 65, pp. 131-143.
16. Lenz, Gabriel (2009) Learning and opinion change, not priming, American Journal of Political Science, 53, pp. 394-410.
17. Lewis-Beck, Michael (2006) Does economics still matter? Econometrics and the vote, Journal of Politics, 68, pp. 208-212.
18. Linn, Suzanna, Moody, Jonathan & Asper, Stephanie (2009) Explaining the horse race of 2008, PS: Political Science and Politics, 42, pp. 459-465.
19. Petrocik, John R. (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study, American Journal of Political Science, 40, pp. 825-850.
20. Treier, Shawn & Hillygus, D. Sunshine (2009) The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate, Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, pp. 640-666.
21. Vavreck, Lynn (2009). The Message Matters: The Economy and Campaign Effects in Presidential Elections (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).