Framing knowledge and innocent victims. Europe bans smoking in public places

Critical Discourse Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-17

  Larsen, Lars Thorup ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Discourse; Framing; Knowledge; Science; Smoking ban; Tobacco control; Topoi

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956236837     PISSN: 17405904     EISSN: 17405912     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17405900903453914     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Arnott, D., Dockrell, M., Sandford, A., & Willmore, I. (2007). Comprehensive smoke-free legislation in England: how advocacy won the day. Tobacco Control, 16, 423-428.
2. de Beyer, J., & Bridgen, L.W. (2003). Tobacco control policy. Strategies, successes, and setbacks. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
3. Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations. Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Boyle, P., Gray, N., Henningfield, J., Seffrin, J., & Zatonski, W. (Eds.). (2004). Tobacco-science, policy and public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Chief Medical Officer (2004). On the state of the public health: annual report of the Chief Medical Officer 2003. London: Department of Heath.
6. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
7. City of Calabasas (2006). Ordinance no. 2006-217. An ordinance of the city of Calabasas regulating second-hand smoke and amending the Calabasas Municipal Code, Retrieved November 11, 2008 from http://www.cityofcalabasas.com/secondhandsmoke.html.
8. Department of Health (2004). Public health (tobacco) act. Dublin: Department of Health.
9. Department of Health (2006a). Health bill 76. London: House of Lords, the Stationery Office.
10. Department of Health (2006b). Reducing exposure to secondhand smoke. London: Department of Health.
11. Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
12. Feldman, E.A., & Bayer, R. (2004). Introduction: liberal states, public health, and the tobacco question. In E.A. Feldman & R. Bayer (Eds.), Unfiltered. Conflicts over tobacco policy and public health (pp. 1-7). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Foucault, M. (1969). L'archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
15. Frankenberg, G. (2004). Between paternalism and voluntarism: tobacco consumption and tobacco control in Germany. In E.A. Feldman & R. Bayer (Eds.), Unfiltered. Conflicts over tobacco policy and public health (pp. 1-7). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R.O. (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: an analytical framework. In J. Goldstein & R.O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy-beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 3-30). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Grue, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis topoi and mystification: disability policy documents from a Norwegian NGO. Discourse Studies, 11(3), 305-328.
18. Haas, P.M. (1992). Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-35.
19. Hajer, M.A., & Laws, D. (2006). Ordering through discourse. In P. Moran et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 251-268). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Hall, P.A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policy-making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296.
21. Helsedepartementet (2003). Proposisjon no. 23 (2002-2003). Oslo: Helsedepartementet.
22. Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoretical and methodological aspects of foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 34-61). London: Sage.
23. Joossens, L., & Raw, M. (2006). The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity. Tobacco Control, 15, 247-253.
24. Joossens, L., & Raw, M. (2007). Progress in tobacco control in 30 European countries 2005 to 2007, Report presented at the 4th European Conference on Tobacco or Health 2007, Basel, 11-13 October 2007.
25. Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.
26. Koop, E.C. (2004). Preface. Tobacco: the public health disaster of the twentieth century. In P. Boyle et al. (Ed.), Tobacco-science, policy and public health (pp. v-xvii). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Larsen, L.T. (2008). The political impact of science: is tobacco control science-or policy-driven? Science and public policy, 35(10), 757-769.
28. Larsen, L.T. (2009). Knowledge into action: a genealogy of public health policy in Denmark and the United States 1975-2005. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
29. Larsen, L.T. (forthcoming). The tactical displacement of ideas, or why I am becoming lakatos intolerant. Austrian Journal of Politics.
30. Leeuwen, T.V. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91-112.
31. Leeuwen, T.V., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: a discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83-118.
32. Marmor, T.R. (2006). Review essay. Book review symposium on the politics of tobacco. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 31(2), 375-384.
33. Marmor, T.R., & Lieberman, E.S. (2004). Tobacco control in comparative perspective: eight nations in search of an explanation. In E.A. Feldman & R. Bayer (Eds.), Unfiltered. Conflicts over tobacco policy and public health (pp. 275-291). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Nathanson, C.A. (1999). Social movements as catalysts for policy change: the case of smoking and guns. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 24(3), 421-488.
35. Nathanson, C.A. (2005). Collective actors and corporate targets in tobacco control: a cross-national comparison. Health Education & Behavior, 32(3), 337-354.
36. NYC Health (2002). New York City smoke-free air act of 2002. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
37. Office of Tobacco Control (2005). Smoke-free workplaces in ireland: a one-year review. Clane: Office of Tobacco Control.
38. Regeringen (2007). Law on smokefree environments (law no. 512 of June 6 2007). Copenhagen: Department of Health and Domestic Affairs.
39. Rein, M., & Schon, D. (1994). Frame reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
40. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87-121). London: Sage.
41. Rhodes, R.A.W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of public policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 181-205.
42. Roemer, R. (2004). A brief history of legislation to control the tobacco epidemic. In P. Boyle et al. (Eds.), Tobacco-science, policy and public health (pp. 677-694). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Sabatier, P.A. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more. In P.A. Sabatier & H.C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 13-39). San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
44. Samet, J.M. (2004). Passive smoking and health. In P. Boyle et al. (Eds.), Tobacco-science, policy and public health (pp. 287-313). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. Schattschneider, E.E. (1975). The semisovereign people. A realist's view of democracy in America. London: Thomson Learning.
46. Smoke Free Partnership (2006). Lifting the smokescreen. 10 reasons for a smoke free Europe. Brussels: European Respiratory Society.
47. Smoke Free World (2008). Website tracking tobacco control policies in various countries and US states. Retrieved November 11, 2008 from http://www.smokefreeworld.com/usa.shtml.
48. Snow, D.M., & Benford, R.D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participation mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
49. Socialdepartementet (2003). Regeringens Proposition 2003/04:65. Rökfrie serveringsmiljöer. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
50. State of New York (2003). Clean indoor air act. Public health law section 1399. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health.
51. State of New York (2004). First annual independent evaluation of New York's tobacco control program. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health.
52. Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox. The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.
53. Studlar, D.T. (2002). Tobacco control. Comparative politics in the United States and Canada. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
54. Studlar, D.T. (2007). What explains policy change in tobacco control policy in advanced industrial democracies? Working paper. Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus.
55. de Villepin, D. (2006). Intervention du Premier Ministre du 8 octobre 2006. Interview on 'Grand Jury'-LCI/RTL/Le Figaro. Retrieved July 18, 2007 from http://www.tabac.gouv.fr/article.php?id_article=192.
56. Wodak, R. (1999). Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1-2), 185-193.
57. Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Leibhart, K. (1999). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
58. Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2000). Discourse & discrimination: rhetorics of racism & antisemitism. London: Routledge.
59. Wolfson, M. (2001). The fight against big tobacco. The movement, the state, and the public's health. New York: de Gruyter.
60. WHO (2003). Framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva: World Health Organization.
61. WHO (2004). Tobacco control legislation: an introductory guide, 2nd ed., Geneva: World Health Organization.