Hard choices - Alternatives for reining in medicare and medicaid spending

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 364, Issue 20, 2011, Pages 1887-1890

  Rosenthal, Meredith B ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC PATIENT; COST CONTROL; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LAW; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79956225997     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1104428     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Comparison of Medicare provisions in deficitreduction proposals. April 4, 2011. (Publication no. 8124.) (http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/8124.pdf.)
2. Idem. Comparison of Medicaid provisions in deficit-reduction proposals. April 14, 2011. (Publication no. 8129.) (http://www.kff.org/medicaid/upload/ 8129.pdf.)
3. Congressional Budget Office. Technological change and the growth of health care spending. January 2008. (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8947/01- 31-TechHealth.pdf.)
4. Idem. Reducing the deficit: spending and revenue options. March 2011. (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/120xx/doc12085/03-10-ReducingTheDeficit.pdf.)
5. Newhouse JP, Insurance Experiment Group. Free for all? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.