On the optimization of piston skirt profiles using a pseudo-adaptive response surface method

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 317-330

  Panayi, A P ^a   Diaz, A R ^a   Schock, H J ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer experiments; Piston skirt design; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

ANGULAR ACCELERATION; COMPUTER EXPERIMENT; FRICTION WORK; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PISTON SKIRT PROFILE; PISTON SKIRTS; PISTON SLAP; RESPONSE SURFACE APPROXIMATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SIMULATION MODEL; SIMULATION TOOL; STANDARD PERFORMANCE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ENGINE PISTONS;

EID: 79956212523     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-008-0295-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beaton AE, Tukey JW (1974) The fitting of power series, meaning polynomials, illustrated on band-spectroscopic data. Technometrics 16:147-185
2. CASE (2007) Mid Michigan Research LLC. www.mmrllc.com
3. EXCITE (2007) Anstalt für Verbrennungskraftmaschinen List. www.avl.com
4. Keribar R, Dursunkaya Z, Ganapathy V (1993) An integrated design analysis methodology to address piston tribological issues. SAE Paper 930793
5. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology, process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
6. Nickalls WDR, Dye HR (1996) The geometry of the discriminant of a polynomial. Math Gaz 80:279-285
7. Panayi AP, Schock HJ (2006) Piston finite element modeling for the estimation of hydrodynamic and contact forces and moments. ASME Proceedings of ICEF2006, Paper ICEF2006-1587
8. Panayi AP, Schock HJ (2007) Investigations on piston secondary dynamics: a model that considers translation along the wristpin and second land interactions with the cylinder bore. ASME Proceedings of IMECE2007, Paper IMECE2007-41264
9. Papila M, Haftka TR (2000) Response surface approximation: noise, error, repair, and modeling errors. AIAA J 38: 2336-2343 (Pubitemid 32085720)
10. Patel P, Mourelatos PZ, Shah P (2007) A comprehensive method for piston secondary dynamics and piston-bore contact. SAE Paper 2007-01-1249
11. PISDYN (2007) Ricardo PLC. www.ricardo.com
12. Simpson WT, Peplinski DJ, Koch NP, Allen KJ (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17:129-150
13. Stinstra E, Stehouwer P, den Hertog D, Vestjens A (2003) Constrained maximin designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 45:340-346
14. Wang GG (2003) Adaptive response surface method using inherited latin hypercube design points. J Mech Des 125:210-220
15. Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering optimization. J Mech Des 129: 370-380 (Pubitemid 46736217)
16. Wang GG, Dong Z, Aitchison P (2001) Adaptive response surface method - a global optimization scheme for computation-intensive design problems. J Eng Optim 33:707-734
17. Wong VW, Tian T, Lang H, Ryan JP, Sekiya Y, Kobayashi Y, Aoyama S (1994) A numerical model of piston secondary motion and piston slap in partially flooded elastohydrodynamic skirt lubrication. SAE Paper 940696
18. Zhu D, Cheng HS, Arai T, Hamai K (1992) A numerical analysis for piston skirts in mixed lubrication - part I: basic modeling. J Tribol 114:553-562
19. Zhu D, Hu Y, Cheng HS, Arai T, Hamai K (1993) A numerical analysis for piston skirts in mixed lubrication - part II: deformation considerations. J Tribol 115:125-133 (Pubitemid 23615720)