Childhood lead exposure in France: Benefit estimation and partial cost-benefit analysis of lead hazard control

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Pichery, Céline ^a   Bellanger, Martine ^a   Zmirou Navier, Denis ^a,b,c   Glorennec, Philippe ^a,f   Hartemann, Philippe ^b,c   Grandjean, Philippe ^d,e  

^a EHESP SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^e HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRINKING WATER; LEAD; PAINT;

CHILD HEALTH; COGNITION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH IMPACT; HEALTH POLICY; INDUSTRIAL EMISSION; LEAD; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; VULNERABILITY;

ARTICLE; CHILD; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; LEAD BLOOD LEVEL; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMICS; WASTE MANAGEMENT; BLOOD; ECONOMICS; INFANT; LEAD POISONING; WATER SUPPLY;

FRANCE;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INFANT; LEAD; LEAD POISONING; PAINT; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 79956211695     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1476069X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-44     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Scientific Opinion on Lead in Food. European Food Authority Safety (EFSA), Journal 2010 8 1570 http://www.efsa.europa.eu [147 pp.].
2. Plomb dans l'environnement: Quels risques pour la santé ? INSERM (INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA SANTE ET LA RECHERCHE MEDICALE), Expertise collective, Inserm Paris, 1999
3. Saturnisme, Quelles stratégies de dépistage chez l'enfant ? Expertise opérationnelle. INVS (Institut National de Veille Sanitaire),, Inserm Paris, 2008
4. Probabilistic modelling of young children's overall lead exposure in France: integrated approach for various exposure media. P Glorennec N Bemrah A Tard A Robin B le Bot D Bard, Environ Int 2007 33 937 945 10.1016/j.envint.2007. 05.004 17573113 (Pubitemid 47271949)
5. Emissions dans l'air en France. CITEPA. Centre Inter-professionnel d'Etude de la Pollution Atmosphérique, Citepa 2004 28 34
6. Decision tools for selecting industrial sites where a systematic blood lead screening should be implemented Masson, Paris, 2006. P Glorennec M Ledrans B Fabres, Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2006 54 117 125 10.1016/S0398-7620(06) 76705-0 16830966 (Pubitemid 43741339)
7. Is compliance to current regulation safe enough for infants and toddlers? G Hivert S Coquet P Glorennec D Bard, Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2002
8. Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control. E Gould, Environmental Health Perspectives 2009 117 1162 1167 19654928
9. P Grandjean, Colloque Environnement chimique, reproduction et développement de l'enfant: 25 November 2008 Paris. MEEDAT 2008
10. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. P Grandjean P Weihe RF White F Debes S Araki K Yokoyama K Murata N Sorensen R Dahl PJ Jørgensen, Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997 19 417 428 10.1016/S0892-0362(97)00097-4 9392777 (Pubitemid 27489345)
11. Blood lead levels in children. P Rudnai, WHO-ENHIS (World Health Organization-European ENvironment and Health Information System): May 2007 Fact sheet N°4.5
12. Imprégnation des enfants par le plomb en France en 2008-2009. Blood lead level in children in France, 2008-2009. A Etchevers C Lecoffre A Le Tertre Y Le Strat Groupe Investigateurs Saturn-Inf C de Launay B Bérat ML Bidondo M Pascal N Fréry P de Crouy-Chanel M Stempfelet JL Salomez P Bretin, http://www.invs.sante.fr/behweb/2010/02/index.htm BEHWeb 2010 (2).
13. Very low lead exposures and children's neurodevelopment. DC Bellinger, Curr Opin Pediatr 2008 20 172 177 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282f4f97b 18332714 (Pubitemid 351365708)
14. Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. BP Lanphear R Hornung J Khoury K Yolton P Baghurst DC Bellinger RL Canfield KN Dietrich R Bornschein T Greene SJ Rothenberg HL Needleman L Schnaas G Wasserman J Graziano R Roberts, Environ Health Perspectives 2005 113 894 899 10.1289/ehp.7688 (Pubitemid 40984191)
15. Lead poisoning. HL Needlemann, Annu Rev Med 2004 55 209 222 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103653 14746518
16. Societal benefits of reducing lead exposure. J Schwartz, Environ Res 1994 66 105 124 10.1006/enrs.1994.1048 8013434 (Pubitemid 24206009)
17. Updated estimates of earnings benefits from reduced exposure of children to environmental lead. DS Salkever, Environ Res 1995 70 1 6 10.1006/enrs.1995. 1038 8603652 (Pubitemid 26133997)
18. Approches économiques et socio-économiques, in Plomb dans l'Environnement: Quels risques pour la santé O Chanel,, INSERM, 1999
19. Apports de l'analyse économique, In Saturnisme Quelles stratégies de dépistage chez l'enfant ? O Chanel,, INSERM, Paris, 2008 215 229
20. L'analyse cot-bénéfice en santé environnementale, in Science et décision en santé environnementale. O Chanel, Collection Santé et Société n°6 1997 52 63 21564030
21. Plumbism reinvented.Childhood lead poisoning in France, 1985-1990. D Fassin A-J Naudé Public Health then and now. American journal of Public Health 2004 94 11 1854 1863
22. Dépistage du saturnisme chez l'enfant en France de 2005 2007. C Lecoffre C Provini P Bretin, Saint-Maurice (Fra): Institut de veille sanitaire 2010 109 http://www.invs.sante.fr
23. Lead exposure in U.S. children, 2008: implications for prevention. R Levin MJ Brown ME Kashtock DE Jacobs EA Whelan J Rodman MR Schock A Padilla T Sinks, Environ Health Perspect 2008 116 1285 1293 10.1289/ehp.11241 18941567
24. Development of Health Criteria for School Site Risk Assessment Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 901(g): Child-Specific Benchmark Change in Blood Lead Concentration for School Site Risk Assessment. California Environmental Protection Agency, Final report. Sacramento, CA:California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment 2007 http://www.oehha.ca.gov/public-info/public/kids/pdf/PbHGV041307. pdf [accessed 2 March 2009]
25. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Risk Assessment on Lead in Women's and Children's Vitamins Is Based on Outdated Assumptions. A Miodovnik PJ Landrigan, Environmental Health Perspectives 2009 117 1021 1022 19654907
26. Cost Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Recent developments. D Pearce G Atkinson S Mourato, OECD (ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT) publishing 2006
27. Economic evaluation of health-producing technologies across different sectors: can valid methods be developed? MF Drummond GL Stoddart, Health Policy 1995 33 219 231 10.1016/0168-8510(94)00717-S 10145123
28. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. MF Drummond J Sculpher Mark W Torrance George J O'Brien Bernie L Stoddart Greg, Oxford University press 2005
29. Guide référentiel destine l'élaboration d'une fiche analytique. Base CODECS, Collège des Economistes de la Santé V7 2004 21598249
30. Analyse Cot bénéfice et risque. enjeux et pratiques. N Treich, Journée ICSI-LERNA (04/04/2006). LERNA-INRA.
31. L'intoxication par le plomb de l'enfant et de la femme enceinte: Dépistage. Prise en charge. French Ministry of Health direction générale de la santé 2006 2
32. Costs and benefits of enforcing policies to prevent childhood poisoning. MJ Brown, Medical Decision Making 2002 22 482 492 10.1177/0272989X02238298 12458978 (Pubitemid 35334818)
33. Lutte contre le saturnisme infantile lie l'habitat indigne. Analyse du dispositif dans trois departements d'Ile de France. IGAS (INSPECTION GENERALE DES AFFAIRES SOCIALES), Rapport n°2004-034, mars 2004 160 15409999
34. Environmental pollutants and disease in American children: Estimates of morbidity, mortality, and costs for lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities. PJ Landrigan CB Schechter JM Lipton MC Fahs J Schwartz, Environ Health Perspect 2002 110 721 708 10.1289/ehp.02110721 12117650
35. Monetary benefits of preventing childhood lead poisoning with lead-safe window replacement. R Nevin DE Jacobs M Berg J Cohen, Environ Res 2008 106 410 419 10.1016/j.envres.2007.09.003 17961540 (Pubitemid 351308078)
36. Understanding international crime trends: the legacy of preschool lead exposure. R Nevin, Environ Res 2006 104 315 336 (Pubitemid 46863421)
37. Learning disabilities in children: significance of low-level lead-exposure and confounding factors. T Lyngbye ON Hansen A Trillingsgaard I Beese P Grandjean, Acta Paed Scand 1990 79 352 60 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1990. tb11469.x (Pubitemid 20088500)
38. La scolarisation des enfants et adolescents handicapés. P Espagnol P Prochandy P Raynaud C Tremoureux, Etude et résultats, DREES N°264. 2007.
39. Study on health effect of environmental lead exposure in children. Q Wang Hh Zhao Jw Chen, Chinese Journal of Public Health 2009 179
40. Production d'Informations Synthétisées Médico- Sociales-ratios nationaux. Structures pour enfants et adultes handicapés. Analyse régionale secteur médico-social en 2008. CRAM de Bretagne, 2010
41. Association of prenatal and childhood blood lead concentrations with criminal arrests in early adulthood. JP Wright KN Dietrich MD Ris RW Hornung SD Wessel BP Lanphear M Ho MN Rae, PLoS Med 2008 5 101 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050101 18507497
42. Bone lead levels in adjudicated delinquents. A case control study. H Needleman C McFarland R Ness S Fienberg M Tobin, Neurotoxicol Teratol 2003 24 711 717
43. Early exposure to lead and juvenile delinquency. K Dietrich M Ris P Succop O Berger R Bornschein, Neurotoxicol Teratol 2001 23 511 518 10.1016/S0892-0362(01)00184-2 11792521 (Pubitemid 34132926)
44. Criminalité et délinquance. A Bauer, Bulletin mensuel de l'observatoire national de la délinquance 2009
45. La situation démographique en 2006. INSEE (National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies), INSEE résultats.
46. Delinquance et insécurité. Combien ça vous cote ? Publibook. JP Arlaud, 2007
47. "Cost of Crime". U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice, Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Justice 2004
48. "Crime in the United States by Volume and Rate per 100,000 Inhabitants, 1989-2008"]. Department of Justice - Federal Bureau of Investigation (USA), Crime in the United States 2008 2009 09
49. Crime and criminal justice. Statistics in focus. C Tavares G Thomas, 2007 http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY-OFFPUB/KS-SF-07-015/EN/KS-SF-07-015- EN.PDF Population and social conditions. Eurostat.
50. Association protection défense de l'environnement de Bourg Fidèle, http://www.bourgfidele.lautre.net/
51. Données technico-économiques sur les substances chimiques en France. JM Brignon S Soleille, INERIS (French National Institut for Industrial Environment and RISks) DRC-Meco 1 2005
52. La tragi-comédie du plomb dans l'eau du robinet. D Garrigues, IEGRE (European Institute Reasoned Management of the Environment) 2009
53. ANAH. http://www.anah.fr/
54. LERES. http://leres.ehesp.fr/
55. Coordinated relocation strategy for enhancing case management of lead poisoned children: Outcomes and costs. P MCLaine W Shields M Farfel JRJJ Chilsom SA Dixon, Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2006 83 111 128 (Pubitemid 44337047)
56. Blood lead below 0.48 mmol/L (10 mg/dL) and mortality among US adults. A Menke P Muntner V Batuman EK Silbergeld E Guallar, Circulation 2006 114 1388 1394 2006 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628321 16982939 (Pubitemid 44454558)
57. Transports: choix des investissements et cot des nuisances. Commissariat General du Plan M Boiteux L Baumstark, La documentation française 2001 325 http://lesrapports.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/BRP/014000434/0000.pdf
58. Reference Values for Human Life. B Desaigues A Rabl, Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995
59. Indicateurs de suivi des engagements européens, http://www.stats.environnement.developpementdurable.gouv.fr/indicateurs/ indicateurs-de-suivi-des-engagements-europeens/indicateurs-de-suivi-des- engagements-europeens/emissions-nationales-de-metaux-lourds-dans-l-air-cadmium- mercure-plomb.html
60. irep. http://www.irep.ecologie.gouv.fr/IREP/index.php
61. Metaleurop, cinq ans après. Gauthier Charles, Le Figaro magazine
62. Estimating the Uncertainty of Damage Costs of Pollution: a Simple Transparent Method and Typical Results. JV Spadaro A Rabl, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2008 28 166 183 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.04.001 (Pubitemid 351308051)
63. Pathway Analysis for Population-Total Health Impacts of Toxic Metal Emissions. JV Spadaro A Rabl, Risk Analysis 2004 24 5 1121 1141 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00514.x 15563283 (Pubitemid 39532448)
64. Economic gains resulting from the reduction in children's exposure to lead in the United States. SD Grosse TD Matte J Schwartz RJ Jackson, Environ Health Perspect 2002 110 563 569 10.1289/ehp.02110563 12055046 (Pubitemid 34661924)
65. The social costs of childhood lead exposure in the post-lead regulation era. P Muennig, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009 163 9 844 849 10.1001/ archpediatrics.2009.128 19736339
66. airparif. http://www.airparif.asso.fr/page.php?rubrique=polluants