Neural correlates of binding features within- or cross-dimensions in visual conjunction search: An fMRI study

NeuroImage

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 235-241

  Wei, Ping ^a,b   Müller, Hermann J ^c   Pollmann, Stefan ^d   Zhou, Xiaolin ^b,e  

^a CAPITAL NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e Peking University   (China)

Author keywords

Conjunction search; Cross dimension conjunction; Feature search; FMRI; Visual search; Within dimension conjunction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL SEARCH; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79956188228     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.024     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersen R.A. Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1997, 352:1421-1428.
2. Arguin M., Joanette Y., Cavanagh P. Visual search for feature and conjunction targets with an attention deficit. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1993, 5436-5452.
3. Ashbridge E., Cowey A., Wade D. Does parietal cortex contribute to feature binding?. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:999-1004.
4. Braithwaite J.J., Humphreys G.W., Hulleman J. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search. Percept. Psychophys. 2005, 67:81-101.
5. Cave K.R., Wolfe J.M. Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cogn. Psychol. 1990, 22:225-271.
6. Cohen A., Feintuch U. The dimensional-action system: a distinct visual system. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX 2002, 587-608. Oxford University Press, Oxford. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
7. Colby C.L., Duhamel J.R. Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex. Cogn. Brain Res. 1996, 5:105-115.
8. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L., Miezin F.M., Petersen S.E. Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science 1995, 270:802-805.
9. Coull J.T., Walsh V., Frith C.D., Nobre A.C. Distinct neural substrates for visual search amongst spatial versus temporal distractors. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 17:368-379.
10. Donner T., Kettermann A., Diesch E., Ostendorf F., Villringer A., Brandt S.A. Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000, 12:3407-3414.
11. Donner T.H., Kettermann A., Diesch E., Ostendorf F., Villringer A., Brandt S.A. Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks. Neuroimage 2002, 15:16-25.
12. Donner T.H., Kettermann A., Diesch E., Villringer A., Brandt S.A. Parietal activation during visual search in the absence of multiple distractors. Neuroreport 2003, 14:2257-2261.
13. Duncan J. Attention and reading: wholes and parts in shape recognition. A tutorial review. Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading 1987, 39-61. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London. M. Coltheart (Ed.).
14. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual-search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev. 1989, 96:433-458.
15. Friedman-Hill S.R., Robertson L.C., Treisman A. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 1995, 69:853-855.
16. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Poline J.B., Grasby P.J., Williams S.C., Frackowiak R.S., Turner R. Analysis of fMRI time series revisited. Neuroimage 1995, 2:45-53.
17. Friston K.J., Penny W.D., Glaser D.E. Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage 2005, 25:661-667.
18. Geyer T., Shi Z., Müller H.J. Contextual cueing in multi-conjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36:515-532.
19. Gitelman D.R., Parrish T.B., Friston K.J., Mesulam M.M. Functional anatomy of visual search: regional segregations within the frontal eye fields and effective connectivity of the superior colliculus. Neuroimage 2002, 15:970-982.
20. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992, 15:20-25.
21. Gottlieb J. From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition. Neuron 2007, 53:9-16.
22. Humphreys G.W. A multi-stage account of binding in vision: neuropsychological evidence. Vis. Cogn. 2001, 8:381-410.
23. Humphreys G.W., Müller H.J. Search via recursive rejection (SERR): a connectionist model of visual search. Cogn. Psychol. 1993, 25:43-110.
24. Humphreys G.W., Cinel C., Wolfe J., Olson A., Klempen N. Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features. Vision Res. 2000, 40:1569-1596.
25. Humphreys G.W., Hodsoll J., Riddoch M.J. Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence from reversed search efficiencies. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2009, 35:627-647.
26. Kaptein N.A., Theeuwes J., Van der Heijden A.H.C. Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1994, 21(5):1053-1069.
27. Kim C., Johnson N.F., Cilles S.E., Gold B.T. Common and distinct mechanisms of cognitive flexibility in prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:4771-4779.
28. Leonards U., Sunaert S., Hecke P.V., Orban G.A. Attention mechanisms in visual search - an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:61-75.
29. Müller-Plath G. Localizing subprocesses of visual search by correlating local brain activation in fMRI with response time model parameters. J. Neurosci. Methods 2008, 171:316-330.
30. Müller-Plath G., Pollmann S. Determining subprocesses of visual feature search with reaction time models. Psychol. Res. 2003, 67:80-105.
31. Nichols T.E., Brett M., Andersson J., Wager T., Poline J.B. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 2005, 25:653-660.
32. Nobre A.C., Coull J.T., Walsh V., Frith C.D. Brain activations during visual search: contributions of search efficiency versus feature binding. Neuroimage 2003, 18:91-103.
33. Oakes L.M., Ross-Sheehy S., Luck S.J. Rapid development of feature binding in visual short-term memory. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:781-787.
34. Price C.J., Friston K.J. Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments. Neuroimage 1997, 5:261-270.
35. Rushworth M.F.S., Paus T., Sipila P.K. Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:5262-5271.
36. Sato T.R., Watanabe K., Thompson K.G., Schall J.D. Effect of target-distractor similarity on FEF visual selection in the absence of the target. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 151:356-363.
37. Shafritz K.M., Gore J.C., Marois R. The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99(16):10917-10922.
38. Snyder L.H., Grieve K.L., Brotchie P., Andersen R.A. Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex. Nature 1998, 394:887-891.
39. Snyder L.H., Batista A.P., Andersen R.A. Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review. Vision Res. 2000, 40:1433-1441.
40. Soto D., Humphreys G.W., Rotshtein P. Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:17186-17191.
41. Tanaka K. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1996, 19:109-139.
42. Treisman A.M. Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 1998, 353:1295-1306.
43. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. Feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn. Psychol. 1980, 12:97-136.
44. Wei P., Müller H.J., Pollmann S., Zhou X. Neural basis of interaction between target presence and display homogeneity in visual search: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2009, 45:993-1001.
45. Weissman D.H., Mangun G.R., Woldorff M.G. A role for top-down attentional orienting during interference between global and local aspects of hierarchical stimuli. Neuroimage 2002, 17:1266-1276.
46. Wilkinson D.T., Halligan P.W., Henson R.N.A., Dolan R.J. The effects of interdistracter similarity on search processes in superior parietal cortex. Neuroimage 2002, 15:611-619.
47. Wojciulik E., Kanwisher N. The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron 1999, 23:747-764.
48. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1994, 1:202-238.