Mind-body connections in personal relationships: What close relationships researchers have to offer

Personal Relationships

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 165-169

  Loving, Timothy J ^a   Campbell, Lorne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956153687     PISSN: 13504126     EISSN: 14756811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01361.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adams, R. G. (2007). Editor's preface: Becoming an interdisciplinary and international journal. Personal Relationships, 14, I-II.
2. Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., & Vallone, R. D. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363-377.
3. Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260-266.
4. Boker, S. M., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2006). Dynamical systems modeling: An application to the regulation of intimacy and disclosure in marriage. In T. A. Walls & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 195-218). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Boker, S. M., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Coupled dynamics and mutually adaptive context. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 299-324). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Brooks, K., Robles, T., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (2011). Adult attachment and cortisol responses to discussions with a romantic partner. Personal Relationships, 18, 302-320.
7. Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342.
8. Diamond, L. M. (2001). Contributions of psychophysiology to research on adult attachment: Review and recommendations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 276-295.
9. Fox, N. A., & Hane, A. A. (2008). Studying the biology of human attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 217-240). New York: Guilford.
10. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275, 991-1000.
11. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1997). On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 271-302). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
12. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1999). The correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguishable case. Personal Relationships, 6, 449-469.
13. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2002). Modeling the personality of dyads and groups. Journal of Personality, 70, 901-924.
14. Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swawnson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swawnson, K. R. (2002). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Using the social relations model to understand relationships. In R. Erber & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 111-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Kenny, D. A. (1995). The effect of nonindependence on significance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships, 2, 67-75.
17. Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
18. Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytical difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448.
19. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
21. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 141-182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
22. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Loving, T. J., Stowell, J. R., Malarkey, W. B., Lemeshow, S., Dickinson, S. L., & Glaser, R. (2005). Hostile marital interactions, proinflammatory cytokine production, and wound healing. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 1377-1384.
23. Kurdek, L. A. (2003). Methodological issues in growth-curve analyses with married couples. Personal Relationships, 10, 235-266.
24. Loving, T. J., Heffner, K. L., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2006). Physiology and interpersonal relationships. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 385-405). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Pasch, L. A., Bradbury, T. N., & Davila, J. (1997). Gender, negative affectivity, and observed social support behavior in marital interaction. Personal Relationships, 4, 361-378.
26. Reis, H. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1-23.
27. Rosenberg, T., & Watson, W. (2009). Families and health: An attachment perspective. In J. H. Bray & M. Stanton (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of family psychology (pp. 539-550). New York: Wiley.
28. Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2010). Attachment and relationships: Milestones and future directions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 173-180.
29. Smith, A. M., Loving, T. J., Crockett, E. E., & Campbell, L. (2009). What's closeness got to do with it? Men's and women's cortisol responses when providing and receiving support. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 843-851.
30. Statistics Canada. (2001). Health indicators .
31. West, T. V., Popp, D., & Kenny, D. A. (2008). A guide for the estimation of gender and sexual orientation effects in dyadic data: An actor-partner interdependence model approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 321-336.