A dialogue model of belief

Argument and Computation

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-46

  Walton, Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

abductive reasoning; acceptance; artificial intelligence; Commitment; computational dialectics; judging belief; multi agent dialogues; practical reasoning

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTIVE REASONING; ACCEPTANCE; COMMITMENT; COMPUTATIONAL DIALECTICS; JUDGING BELIEF; MULTI-AGENT; PRACTICAL REASONING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SPEECH PROCESSING;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 79956144935     PISSN: 19462166     EISSN: 19462174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19462160903494576     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2006), 'Computational Representation of Practical Argument', Synthese, 152, 157-206. (Pubitemid 44510926)
2. Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (2003), 'Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks', Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 429-448.
3. Bratman, M. (1987), Intention, Plans and Practical Reason, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Bratman, M. (1993), 'Practical Reasoning and Acceptance in a Context', Mind, 1-2, 1-15.
5. Bratman, M.E., Israel, D.J., and Pollack, M.E. (1988), 'Plans and Resource-bounded Practical Reasoning', Computational Intelligence, 4, 349-355.
6. Churchland, P. (1981), 'Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes', Journal of Philosophy, 78, 67-90.
7. Cohen, J. (1992), An Essay on Belief and Acceptance, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Dunne, P.E., Doutre, S., and Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (2005), 'Discovering Inconsistency through Examination Dialogues', in Proceedings IJCAI-05 (International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence), Edinburgh, pp. 1560-1561. http://ijcai.org/search.php.
9. Dunne, P.E., and Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (eds.) (2006), 'Computational Models of Argument', in Proceedings of COMMA 2006, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 195-207.
10. Engel, P. (1998), 'Believing, Holding True, and Accepting', Philosophical Explorations, 1, 140-151.
11. Engel, P. (ed.) (2000), Believing and Accepting, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Godden, D.M. (in press), 'The Importance of Belief in Argumentation', Synthese.
13. Hamblin, C.L. (1970), Fallacies, London: Methuen.
14. Hamblin, C.L. (1971), 'Mathematical Models of Dialogue', Theoria, 37, 130-155.
15. Hinzen, W. (2001), 'Review of Engel (2000)', Grazer Philosophische Studien, 62, 282-286.
16. Kaplan, M. (1981), 'Rational Acceptance', Philosophical Studies, 40, 129-146.
17. Levi, I. (1997), Rational Acceptance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Maudet, N., and Chaib-Draa, B. (2002), 'Commitment-based and Dialogue-game-based Protocols: New Trends in Agent Communication Languages', The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17, 157-179.
19. Meijers, A. (2002), 'Collective Agents and Cognitive Attitudes', Protosociology, 16, 70-85.
20. Paglieri, F., and Castelfranchi, C. (2005), 'Arguments as Belief Structures', in The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, eds. D. Hitchcock and D. Farr, Hamilton, Ontario: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 356-367.
21. Peirce, C.S. (1877), 'The Fixation of Belief', Popular Science Monthly, 12, 1-15.
22. Reed, C., and Walton, D. (2007), 'Argumentation Schemes in Dialogue', in Dissensus & the Search for Common Ground: Proceedings of OSSA, Windsor, Ontario, CD-ROM, 1-11. http://www. dougwalton.ca/papers%20in%20pdf/07OSSAchris. pdf
23. Rudder Baker, L. (1989), Saving Belief, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Searle, J.R. (2001), Rationality in Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Singh, M.P. (1998), 'Agent Communication Languages: Rethinking the Principles', Computer, 31, 425-445.
26. Stitch, S. (1983), From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Tuomela, R. (2000), 'Belief Versus Acceptance', Philosophical Explorations, 2, 122-137.
28. van Eemeren, F.H., and Grootendorst, R. (1992), Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Walton, D. (1984), Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies, Lanham, MD: University Press of America. http://www.dougwalton.ca/books/LDG84bk.pdf
30. Walton, D. (1990), Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation, Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
31. Walton, D. (2006), 'Examination Dialogue: An Argumentation Framework for Critically Questioning an Expert Opinion', Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 745-777. (Pubitemid 43586096)
32. Walton, D., and Krabbe, E.C.W. (1995), Commitment in Dialogue, Albany: State University of New York Press.
33. Walton, D., Reed, C., and Macagno, F. (2008), Argumentation Schemes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wooldridge, M. (2000a), Reasoning about Rational Agents, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Wooldridge, M. (2000b), 'Semantic Issues in the Verification of Agent Communication Languages', Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3, 9-31.
36. Wooldridge, M. (2002), MultiAgent Systems, Chichester: Wiley.