Prospective image registration for automated scan prescription of follow-up knee images in quantitative studies

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 693-700

  Goldenstein, Janet ^a,b   Schooler, Joseph ^a   Crane, Jason C ^a   Ozhinsky, Eugene ^a,b   Pialat, Jean Baptiste ^a   Carballido Gamio, Julio ^a,c   Majumdar, Sharmila ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UCSF/UCB Joint Graduate Group in Bioengineering   (United States)

^c Grupo Tecnológico Sante Fe   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Knee; Mutual information based registration algorithm; Scan prescription

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CARTILAGE DEGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR CONDYLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; KNEE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELAXATION TIME; SOFT TISSUE; TIBIA;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIBIA;

EID: 79956144263     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.023     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lawrence R.C., Helmick C.G., Arnett F.C., Deyo R.A., Felson D.T., Giannini E.H., et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998, 41(5):778-799.
2. WHO Global Economic and Health Care Burden of Musculoskeletal Disease 2001, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, Available from: www.boneandjointdecade.org.
3. McAlindon T.E., LaValley M.P., Gulin J.P., Felson D.T. Glucosamine and chondroitin for treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic quality assessment and meta-analysis. JAMA 2000, 283(11):1469-1475.
4. Eckstein F., Cicuttini F., Raynauld J.P., Waterton J.C., Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, 14(Suppl A):A46-A75.
5. Stahl R., Blumenkrantz G., Carballido-Gamio J., Zhao S., Munoz T., Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau M.P., et al. MRI-derived T2 relaxation times and cartilage morphometry of the tibio-femoral joint in subjects with and without osteoarthritis during a 1-year follow-up. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15(11):1225-1234.
6. Konig H., Sauter R., Deimling M., Vogt M. Cartilage disorders: comparison of spin-echo, CHESS, and FLASH sequence MR images. Radiology 1987, 164(3):753-758.
7. Li X., Benjamin Ma C., Link T.M., Castillo D.D., Blumenkrantz G., Lozano J., et al. In vivo T(1rho) and T(2) mapping of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3 T MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15(7):789-797.
8. Dunn T.C., Lu Y., Jin H., Ries M.D., Majumdar S. T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Radiology 2004, 232(2):592-598.
9. David-Vaudey E., Ghosh S., Ries M., Majumdar S. T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 22(5):673-682.
10. Hunter D.J., Niu J., Zhang Y., Totterman S., Tamez J., Dabrowski C., et al. Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68(3):349-356.
11. Hellio Le Graverand M.P., Buck R.J., Wyman B.T., Vignon E., Mazzuca S.A., Brandt K.D., et al. Subregional femorotibial cartilage morphology in women-comparison between healthy controls and participants with different grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17(9):1177-1185.
12. Wluka A.E., Stuckey S., Snaddon J., Cicuttini F.M. The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46(8):2065-2072.
13. Lecouvet F.E., Claus J., Schmitz P., Denolin V., Bos C., Vande Berg B.C. Clinical evaluation of automated scan prescription of knee MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 29(1):141-145.
14. Maes F., Collignon A., Vandermeulen D., Marchal G., Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997, 16(2):187-198.
15. Viola R.A., Wells G.A., Peterson J. The effects of fluid status and fluid therapy on the dying: a systematic review. J Palliat Care 1997, 13(4):41-52.
16. Peterfy C.G., Guermazi A., Zaim S., Tirman P.F., Miaux Y., White D., et al. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12(3):177-190.
17. Stahl R., Luke A., Li X., Carballido-Gamio J., Ma C.B., Majumdar S., et al. T1rho, T2 and focal knee cartilage abnormalities in physically active and sedentary healthy subjects versus early OA patients-a 3.0-Tesla MRI study. Eur Radiol 2009, 19(1):132-143.
18. Haralick R.M., Shapiro L.G. Computer and Robot Vision 1992, Vol. 1:28-48. Addison-Wesley, New York.
19. Carballido-Gamio J., Bauer J., Lee K.Y., Krause S., Majumdar S. Combined image processing techniques for characterization of MRI cartilage of the knee. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005, 3:3043-3046.
20. Carballido-Gamio J., Bauer J.S., Stahl R., Lee K.Y., Krause S., Link T.M., et al. Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness. Med Image Anal 2008, 12(2):120-135.
21. Gluer C.C., Blake G., Lu Y., Blunt B.A., Jergas M., Genant H.K. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995, 5(4):262-270.
22. Eckstein F., Gavazzeni A., Sittek H., Haubner M., Losch A., Milz S., et al. Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three-dimensional magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (3D MR-CCM). Magn Reson Med 1996, 36(2):256-265.
23. Benner T., Wisco J.J., van der Kouwe A.J., Fischl B., Vangel M.G., Hochberg F.H., et al. Comparison of manual and automatic section positioning of brain MR images. Radiology 2006, 239(1):246-254.
24. Itti L., Chang L., Ernst T. Automatic scan prescription for brain MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001, 45(3):486-494.
25. Pekar V., Bystrov D., Heese H.S., Dries S.P., Schmidt S., Grewer R., et al. Automated planning of scan geometries in spine MRI scans. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007, 10(Pt 1):601-608.
26. Blumenfeld J., Carballido-Gamio J., Krug R., Blezek D.J., Hancu I., Majumdar S. Automatic prospective registration of high-resolution trabecular bone images of the tibia. Ann Biomed Eng 2007, 35(11):1924-1931.
27. Rajapakse C.S., Magland J.F., Wehrli F.W. Fast prospective registration of in vivo MR images of trabecular bone microstructure in longitudinal studies. Magn Reson Med 2008, 59(5):1120-1126.
28. Bystrov D., Pekar V., Young S., Dries S.P.M., Heese H.S., van Muiswinkel A.M. Automated Planning of MRI Scans of Knee Joints 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging, San Diego.
29. Glaser C., Mendlik T., Dinges J., Weber J., Stahl R., Trumm C., et al. Global and regional reproducibility of T2 relaxation time measurements in human patellar cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2006, 56(3):527-534.
30. Eckstein F., Westhoff J., Sittek H., Maag K.P., Haubner M., Faber S., et al. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998, 170(3):593-597.
31. Eckstein F., Burstein D., Link T.M. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed 2006, 19(7):822-854.