Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator: Description of a new technique and its outcome

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 283, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1053-1057

  Kavallaris, Andreas ^a   Chalvatzas, N ^a   Kelling, K ^a   Bohlmann, M K ^a   Diedrich, K ^a   Hornemann, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; PKS cutting forceps; Sonosurgical; TLH

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FORCEPS; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UTERINE MANIPULATOR; UTERUS WEIGHT; VAGINAL TUBE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79956141810     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: 14320711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1494-1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Reich H, Decaprio J, McGlynn F (1989) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynaecol Surg 5:213-216 (Pubitemid 19240025)
2. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003677
3. College T (ed) (1990) Precis IV: an update in obstetrics and gynecology. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC
4. Society of Pelvic Reconstructive Surgeons (2004) Guideline for determining the route and method of hysterectomy for benign conditions. SPRS, Atlanta
5. Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L (2000) Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG 107:1380-1385
6. Ng CCM, Chern BSM (2007) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a 5-year experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:613-618 (Pubitemid 350029494)
7. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S et al (2004) The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, and the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. Br Med J 328:129
8. Cook JR, OShea RT, Seman EI (2004) Laparovaginal hysterectomy: a decade of evolution. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 44:111-116 (Pubitemid 38618601)
9. Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB et al (2002) The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:339-345
10. Shen CC, Wu MP, Kung FT et al (2003) Major complications associated with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a ten year experience. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:147-153
11. Makinen J, Johansson J, Tomas C et al (2001) Morbidity of 10110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 16:1473-1478 (Pubitemid 32640326)
12. Rempen A (1996) Laparoscopic assistance at vaginal hysterectomy: a literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 258:55-64
13. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R (2005) Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 330:1478-1485