Public support for the use of newborn screening dried blood spots in health research

Public Health Genomics

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 143-152

  Duquette, D ^a   Rafferty, A P ^a   Fussman, C ^a   Gehring, J ^a   Meyer, S ^b   Bach, J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Community; DNA biobank; Dried blood spots; Health survey; Newborn screening; Public attitudes; Research policy

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; BLOOD SAMPLING; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY; DRIED BLOOD SPOT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; NEWBORN SCREENING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATAL SCREENING; PUBLIC OPINION;

EID: 79956122721     PISSN: 16624246     EISSN: 16628063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000321756     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Guthrie P: Pressure mounts to expand screening of US newborns. CMAJ 2005; 173: 22.
2. Stein R: Blood samples raise questions of privacy. Washington Post. 2009. http://www. washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/ 2009/06/29/ AR2009062903118.html (accessed January 29, 2010).
3. Couzin-Frankel J: Newborn blood collections: science gold mine, ethical minefield. Science 2009; 324: 166-168.
4. Haga S: Weighing consent in babies' screening. 2009. http://www. newsobserver.com/ opinion/story/134032.html (accessed December 21, 2009).
5. Cohen E: The government has your baby's DNA. 2010. http://www.cnn.com/ 2010/ HEALTH/02/04/baby.dna.government/index. html?hpt=C2 (accessed February 5, 2010).
6. Associated Press: Newborn blood used in research angers parents. 2010. http://www. msnbc.msn.com/id/35301574/ns/healthpregnancy/ (accessed February 10, 2010).
7. American College of Medical Genetics: Position Statement on Residual Newborn Screening Dried Blood Spots. 2009. http://www. acmg.net/StaticContent/ NewsReleases/ Blood-Spot-Position-Statement2009.pdf (accessed December 21, 2009).
8. Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children: Considerations and Recommendations for a National Policy Regarding the Retention and Use of Dried Blood Spot Specimens after Newborn Screening: Briefing ('White') Paper/September 2009. https://www.signup4.net/Upload/ ALTA10A/18TH10E / 2 -Wh i t e%2 0 Paper%209%2012%2009%20Final%20I.pdf (accessed December 21, 2009).
9. Therrell BL, Johnson A, Williams D: Status of newborn screening programs in the United States. Pediatrics 2006; 117:S212-S252. (Pubitemid 46071311)
10. Olney RS, Moore CA, Ojodu JA, Lindegren ML, Hannon WH: Storage and use of residual dried blood spots from state newborn screening programs. J Pediatr 2006; 148: 618-622. (Pubitemid 43776916)
11. Michigan Commission on Genetic Privacy and Progress: Final Report and Recommendations. 1999. http://www.michigan.gov/ documents/GeneticsReport-11649- 7.pdf (accessed May 3, 2010).
12. Michigan Legislature: Public Health Code, Section 333.5431. 1978. http://www.legislature. mi.gov/(S(twnhnm55sjkgpf45q5- wcrrzo))/mileg.aspx?page= getObject&object Name=mcl-333-5431 (accessed May 3, 2010).
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 1984. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/ (accessed May 26, 2009).
14. Research Triangle Institute: SUDAAN Language Manual, Release 10.0. Research Triangle Park, NC, Research Triangle Institute, 2008.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 2008 Summary Data Quality Report. http:// www.cdc.gov/brfss/technical-infodata/ quality.htm (accessed May 26, 2009).
16. King TE Jr: Racial disparities in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1400-1402. (Pubitemid 34754615)
17. Paskett ED, Reeves KW, McLaughlin JM, Katz ML, Scheck McAlearney AS, Ruffin MT, Halbert CH, Merete C, Davis F, Gehlert S: Recruitment of minority and underserved populations in the United States: the Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities Experience. Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29: 847-861.
18. Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Mullins CD, Mishra SI: Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev 2006; 30: 24-33. (Pubitemid 43374500)
19. Bussey-Jones J, Garrett J, Henderson G, Moloney M, Blumenthal C, Corbie-Smith G: The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research. Genet Med 2010; 12: 116-121.
20. Michigan Department of Community Health: Michigan Newborn Screening Program: A First Step to Your Baby's Health. Lansing, Michigan Department of Community Health, Newborn Screening Program, 2008.
21. Tarini BA, Goldenberg A, Singer D, Clark SJ, Butchart A, Davis MM: Not without my permission: parents' willingness to permit use of newborn screening samples for research. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 125-130.
22. Mei JV, Alexander JR, Adam BW, Hannon WH: Use of filter paper for the collection and analysis of human whole blood specimens. J Nutr 2001; 131:S1631-S1636.
23. Fleck LM, Mongoven A, Marzec S: Institute for Public Policy and Social Research at Michigan State University. Informing the Debate Stored Blood Spots: Ethical and Policy Challenges. 2008. http://ippsr.msu.edu/ Publications/HPFleck. pdf (accessed December 23, 2009).
24. Goldenberg AJ, Hull SC, Botkin JR, Wilfond BS: Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. J Pediatr 2009; 155: 578-583.