Counselling styles and their effect on subdermal contraceptive implant continuation rates

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 225-228

  Rubenstein, Joshua ^a   Rubenstein, Punam ^b   Barter, Janet ^b   Pittrof, Rudiger ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Town Clinic   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Counselling styles; Implanon Continuation rates; Subdermal implant

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; ETONOGESTREL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; COUNSELING; DRUG IMPLANT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; COUNSELING; DESOGESTREL; DRUG IMPLANTS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONDON; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79956121422     PISSN: 13625187     EISSN: 14730782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2011.561939     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Harvey C, SeibC, Lucke J. Continuation rates and reasons for removal among Implanon users accessing two family planning clinics in Queensland, Australia. Contraception 2009;80:527-32.
2. Fleming D, Davie J,Glasier A. Continuation rates of longacting methods of contraception: A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices. Contraception 1998;57:19-21. (Pubitemid 28160430)
3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. CG30. Long acting reversible contraception: the effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception. London: RCOG Press 2005.
4. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. FSRH Guidance: Progestogen-only implants. London 2008.
5. Smith A, Reuter S. An assessment of the use of Implanon in three community services. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2002;28:193-6. (Pubitemid 35439631)