Micromechanisms of fracture from acoustic emission

International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 666-673

  Kao, C S ^a   Carvalho, F C S ^a   Labuz, J F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic emission; Displacement discontinuity; Microcracking; Moment tensor; Source model; Tortuosity

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING; CHARCOAL; FRACTURE; FRACTURE TESTING; MICROCRACKS;

ACOUSTIC EMISSION SOURCES; ACOUSTIC-EMISSIONS; DISPLACEMENT DISCONTINUITY; DISPLACEMENT VECTORS; MICROMECHANISMS; MODE I FRACTURE; MOMENT TENSORS; SOURCE MODELS; SOURCE PARAMETERS; TORTUOSITY;

UNLOADING;

ACOUSTIC EMISSION; AMPLITUDE; CHARCOAL; ERROR ANALYSIS; FRACTURE MECHANICS; FRACTURE PROPAGATION; GRANITE; MICROCRACK; MICROMECHANICS; MOMENT TENSOR; PARAMETERIZATION; TORTUOSITY;

EID: 79956117134     PISSN: 13651609     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Scruby C.B., Baldwin G.R., Stacey K.A. Characterization of fatigue crack extension by quantitative acoustic emission. Int J Fract 1985, 28:201-222.
2. Ohtsu M., Ono K. AE source location and orientation of tensile cracks from surface observation. NDT Int 1988, 21:143-150.
3. Shah K.R., Labuz J.F. Damage mechanisms in stressed rock from acoustic emission. J Geophys Res 1995, 100(B8):15527-15539.
4. Burridge R., Knopoff L. Body force equivalents for seismic dislocations. Bull Seis Soc Am 1964, 54:1875-1888.
5. Rice J.R. Elastic wave emission from damage processes. J Nondestruc Eval 1980, 1(4):215-224.
6. Aki K., Richards P.G. Quantitative seismology: theory and methods 1980, Freeman, San Francisco.
7. Young R.P., Hazzard J.F., Pettitt W.S. Seismic and micromechanical studies of rock fracture. Geophys Res Lett 2000, 27(12):1767-1770.
8. Grosse C.U., Reinhardt H.-W., Finck F. Signal-based acoustic emission techniques in civil engineering. J Mater Civil Eng (ASCE) 2003, 15(3):274-279.
9. To A.C., Glaser S.D. Full waveform inversion of a 3-D source inside an artificial rock. J Sound Vib 2005, 285(4-5):835-857.
10. Linzer L.M.A. Relative moment tensor inversion technique applied to seismicity induced by mining. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2005, 38(2):81-104.
11. Breckenridge F.R., Tschiegg C.E., Greenspan M. Acoustic emission: some applications of Lamb's problem. J Acoust Soc Am 1975, 57(3):626-631.
12. Michaels J.E., Michaels T.E., Sachse W. Application of deconvolution to acoustic emission signal analysis. Mater Eval 1981, 3:1032-1036.
13. Ohtsu M. Simplified moment tensor analysis and unified decomposition of acoustic emission source. J Geophys Res 1991, 96(B4):6211-6221.
14. Ono K. Current understanding of mechanics of acoustic emission. J Strain Anal Eng Des 2005, 40(1):1-15.
15. Hamstad M.A., Gary J., O'Gallagher A. On wide-band acoustic emission displacement signals as a function of source rise-time and plate thickness. J Acoust Emission 1998, 16(1-4):S251-S259.
16. Fukunaga Y, Kishi T. Dymanic Green's function of finite media by finite difference method. In: Progress in acoustic emission III. Tyoko, Japan: JSNDI; 1986, p. 722-31.
17. Masaki R, Takemoto M, Ono K. A faster facture source for quantitative acoustic emission simulation-laser break-down of silicon in a crack. In: Non-destructive characterization of materials, vol. IX, AIP conference proceedings 497. American Institute of Physics, New York; 1999. p. 3-8.
18. Sato T., Takemoto M., Ono K. Effect of fracture dynamics in thin plate on the waveform and radiation pattern of the Lamb waves. Jpn J Appl Phys 1999, 38:3193-3200.
19. Manthei G. Characterization of acoustic emission sources in a rock salt specimen under triaxial compression. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2005, 95(5):1674-1700.
20. Carvalho F., Labuz J.F. Moment tensors of acoustic emissions in shear faulting under plane-strain compression. Tectonophysics 2002, 356:199-211.
21. Feignier B., Young R.P. Moment tensor inversion of induced microseismic events: evidence of non-shear failures in the -4
22. Hsu N.N., Simmons J.A., Hardy S.C. An approach to acoustic emission signal analysis. Mater Eval 1977, 35:100-106.
23. Simmons J.A., Turner C.D., Wadley H.N.G. Vector calibration of ultrasonic and acoustic emission transducers. J Acoust Soc Am 1987, 82:1122-1130.
24. Pekeris C.L. The seismic surface pulse. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1955, 41:469-480.
25. Mooney H. Some numerical solutions for Lamb's problem. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1974, 64:473-491.
26. Allmendinger RW. StereoWin, v.1.2.0. General purpose stereographic projection program. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University. Ithaca, NY. 〈〉. http://www.geo.cornell.edu/geology/faculty/RWA/programs.html.
27. Ishida T., Chen Q., Mizuta Y., Roegiers J.-C. Influence of fluid viscosity on the hydraulic fracturing mechanism. J Energy Resour Technol 2004, 126:190-200.
28. Pettitt W.S., King M.S. Acoustic emission and velocities associated with the formation of sets of parallel fractures in sandstones. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2004, 41(suppl 1):151-156.
29. Sommer E. Formation of fracture 'Lances' in glass. Eng Fract Mech 1969, 1(3):539-546.
30. Cooke M.L., Pollard D.D. Fracture propagation paths under mixed mode loading within rectangular blocks of polymethyl mechacrylate. J Geophys Res 1996, 101:3387-3400.
31. Hull D. The effect of mixed mode I/III on crack evolution in brittle solids. Int J Fract 1995, 70:59-79.
32. Wu R., Germanovich L.N., Van Dyke P.E., Lowell R.P. Thermal technique for controlling hydraulic fractures. J Geophys Res 2007, 112:B05209.
33. Labuz J.F., Biolzi L. Class I vs class II stability: a demonstration of size effect. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1991, 28:199-205.