Limited response of ponderosa pine bole defenses to wounding and fungi

Tree Physiology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 428-437

  Gaylord, Monica L ^a   Hofstetter, Richard W ^a   Kolb, Thomas E ^a   Wagner, Michael R ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arizona; Dendroctonus; Grosmannia; Ips; Ophiostoma; Pinus ponderosa; wound response

Indexed keywords

PLANT RESIN;

BEETLE; BIOCONTROL AGENT; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; CONIFEROUS TREE; FUNGUS; INOCULATION; LESION; LIMITING FACTOR; PLANT DEFENSE; RESIN; WOUNDING;

ANIMAL; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; OPHIOSTOMATALES; PARASITOLOGY; PATHOGENICITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT IMMUNITY; PLANT STEM; PONDEROSA PINE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; TIME; UNITED STATES; WEEVIL;

ANIMALS; ARIZONA; OPHIOSTOMATALES; PINUS PONDEROSA; PLANT DISEASES; PLANT IMMUNITY; PLANT STEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESINS, PLANT; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS; WEEVILS;

CLAVIGERA; COLEOPTERA; CURCULIONIDAE; DENDROCTONUS; FUNGI; IPS; OPHIOSTOMA; OPHIOSTOMA MINUS; PINUS PONDEROSA; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 79956097587     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpr025     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Adler, F.R. and R. Karban. 1994. Defended fortresses or moving targets? Another model of inducible defenses inspired by military metaphors. Am. Nat. 144:813-832.
2. Baier, P., E. Fuhrer, T. Kirisits and S. Rosner. 2002. Defence reactions of Norway spruce against bark beetles and the associated fungus Ceratocystis polonica in secondary pure and mixed species stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 159:73-86. (Pubitemid 34264596)
3. Bazzaz, F.A., N.R. Chiariello, P.D. Coley and L.F. Pitelka. 1987. Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. BioScience 37:58-67.
4. Berryman, A.A. 1972. Resistance of conifers to invasion by bark beetle-fungus associations. BioScience. 22:598-602.
5. Breece, C.R., T.E. Kolb, B.G. Dickson, J.D. McMillin and K.M. Clancy. 2008. Prescribed fre effects on bark beetle activity and tree mortality in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 25 5 :119-128 . (Pubitemid 351173493)
6. Christiansen, E. and P. Krokene. 1999. Can Norway spruce trees be 'vaccinated' against attack by Ips typographus? Agric. For. Entomol. 1:185-187. (Pubitemid 129640116)
7. Christiansen, E., R.H. Waring and A.A. Berryman. 1987. Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. For. Ecol. Manage. 22:89-106.
8. Christiansen, E., P. Krokene, A.A. Berryman, V.R. Franceschi, T. Krekling, F. Lieutier, A. Lonneborg and H. Solheim. 1999. Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. Tree Physiol. 19:399-403. (Pubitemid 29228785)
9. Coley, P.D. 1988. Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense. Oecologia 74:531-536. (Pubitemid 20417400)
10. Coley, P.D., J.P. Bryant and F.S. Chapin, III. 1985. Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defense. Science 230:895-899. (Pubitemid 16279700)
11. Cook, S.P. and F.P. Hain. 1987. Susceptibility of trees to southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 16:9-14.
12. DeAngelis, J.D., J.D. Hodges and T.E. Nebeker. 1986. Phenolic metabolites of Ceratocystis minor from laboratory cultures and their effects on transpiration in loblolly pine seedlings. Can. J. Bot. 64:151-155.
13. Feeney, S.R., T.E. Kolb, M.R. Wagner and W.W. Covington. 1998. Infuence of thinning and burning restoration treatments on preset-tlement ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson Natural Area. Can. J. For. Res. 28:1295-1306.
14. Fettig, C.J., K.D. Klepzig, R.F. Billings, A.S. Munson, T.E. Nebeker, J.F. Negrón and J.T. Nowak. 2007. The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. For. Ecol. Manage. 238:24-53. (Pubitemid 46038624)
15. Fischer, M., K. Waring, R.W. Hofstetter and T.E. Kolb. 2010. Characteristics of ponderosa pine susceptible to Dendroctonus adjunctus. For. Sci. 56: 473-483.
16. Franceschi, V.R., P. Krokene, E. Christiansen and T. Krekling. 2005. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. Tansley Rev. New Phytol. 167:353-376. (Pubitemid 41576975)
17. Gaylord, M.L. 2009. Factors impacting management of pine bark beetles in ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona. Ph.D. dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
18. Gaylord, M.L., T.E. Kolb, K.F. Wallin and M.R. Wagner. 2006. Seasonality and lure preference of bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and associates in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Environ. Entomol. 35:37-47. (Pubitemid 44605659)
19. Gaylord, M.L., T.E. Kolb, K.F. Wallin and M.R. Wagner. 2007. Seasonal dynamics of tree growth, physiology, and resin defenses in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Can. J. For. Res. 37:1173-1183. (Pubitemid 350056938)
20. Gaylord, M.L., R.W. Hofstetter and M.R. Wagner. 2010. Impacts of silvi-cultural thinning treatments on beetle trap captures and tree attacks during low bark beetle populations in ponderosa pine forests of northern Arizona. Econ. Entomol. 103:1693-1703.
21. Herms, D.A. and W.J. Mattson. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 67:283-335.
22. Hodges, J.D., W.W. Elam, W.F. Watson and T.E. Nebeker. 1979. Oleoresin characteristics and susceptibility of four southern pines to southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacks. Can. Entomol. 111:889-896.
23. Holsten, E.H., R.W. Thier, A.S. Munson and K.E. Gibson. 1999. The Spruce Beetle. Forest Insect & Disease Leafet 127. USDA, Forest Service.
24. Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological feld experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187-211.
25. Klepzig, K.D., D.J. Robison, G. Fowler, P.R. Minchin, F.P. Hain and H.L. Allen. 2005. Effects of mass inoculation on induced oleoresin response in intensively managed loblolly pine. Tree Physiol. 25:681-688. (Pubitemid 40902403)
26. Kolb, T.E., K.M. Holmberg, M.R. Wagner and J.E. Stone. 1998. Regulation of ponderosa pine foliar physiology and insect resistance mechanisms by basal area treatments. Tree Physiol. 18:375-381. (Pubitemid 28276372)
27. Krekling, T., V.R. Franceschi, P. Krokene and H. Solheim. 2004. Differential anatomical response of Norway spruce stem tissues to sterile and fungus infected inoculations. Trees 18:1-9. (Pubitemid 38119142)
28. Lewinsohn, E., M. Gijzen and R. Croteau. 1991. Defense mechanisms of conifers: differences in constitutive and wound-induced monoter-pene biosynthesis among species. Plant Physiol. 96:44-49. (Pubitemid 21913969)
29. Lieutier, F. 1993. Induced defence reaction of conifers to bark beetles and their associated Ophiostoma species. In Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity. Eds. M.J. Wingfeld, K.A. Seifert and J.F. Webber. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, pp 225-233.
30. Lieutier, F. 2002. Mechanism of resistance in conifers and bark beetle attack strategies. In Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects. Eds. M.R. Wagner, K.M. Clancy, F. Lieutier and T.D. Paine. Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands, pp 31-77.
31. Lieutier, F. 2004. Host resistance to bark beetles. In Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe: A Synthesis. Eds. F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J-C. Gregoire and H.F. Evans. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 134-180.
32. Lieutier, F., A. Yart, H. Ye, D. Sauvard and V. Gallois. 2004. Variations in growth and virulence of Leptographium wingfieldii Morelet, a fungus associated with the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda L. Ann. For. Sci. 61:45-53. (Pubitemid 38549835)
33. Lombardero, M.J., M.P. Ayres, P.L. Lorio, Jr and J.J. Ruel. 2000. Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defences of Pinus taeda. Ecol. Lett. 3:329-339. (Pubitemid 30597800)
34. Lorio, P.L. Jr. 1993. Environmental stress and whole-tree physiology. In Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. Eds. T.D. Schowalter and G.M. Filip. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 81-101.
35. Massey, C.L., D.D. Lucht and J.M. Schmid. 1977. Roundheaded Pine Beetle. Forest Insect & Disease Leafet 155. USDA, Forest Service.
36. Matson, P.A. and F.P. Hain. 1985. Host conifer defense strategies: a hypothesis. In The Role of the Host in the Population Dynamics of Forest Insects. Ed. L. Safranyik. Proceedings IUFRO Conference, Banff, Canada, 4-7 September 1983. Canadian Forestry Service and USDA Forest Service, Victoria, BC, pp. 33-42.
37. Miller, J.M. and F.P. Keen. 1960. Biology and control of the Western pine beetle: a summary of the frst ffty years of research. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, 381 pp.
38. Mitchell, R.G., R.H. Waring and G.B. Pitman. 1983. Thinning lodgepole pine increases tree vigor and resistance to mountain pine beetle. For. Sci. 29:204-211. (Pubitemid 14273676)
39. National Climate Data Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2010. NOAA. Precipitation Data (http://www.ncdc. noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html.)
40. Negrón, J.F. and J.B. Popp. 2004. Probability of ponderosa pine infestation by mountain pine beetle in the Colorado front range. For. Ecol. Manage. 191:17-27. (Pubitemid 38345610)
41. Owen, D.R., K.Q. Lindahl, Jr, D.L. Wood and J.R. Parmeter, Jr. 1987. Pathogenicity of fungi isolated from Dendroctonus valens, D. brevicomis, and D. ponderosae to ponderosa pine seedlings. Phytopathology 77:631-636.
42. Paine, T.D. 1984. Seasonal response of ponderosa pine to inoculation of the mycangial fungi from the western pine beetle. Can. J. Bot. 62:551-555. (Pubitemid 15276242)
43. Paine, T.D. and F.M. Stephen. 1987. Fungi associated with the southern pine beetle: avoidance of induced defense response in loblolly pine. Oecologia 74:377-379. (Pubitemid 20417946)
44. Paine, T.D., K.F. Raffa and T.C. Harrington. 1997. Interactions among Scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:179-206.
45. Popp, M.P., J.D. Johnson and T.L. Massey. 1991. Stimulation of resin fow in slash and loblolly pine by bark beetle vectored fungi. Can. J. For. Res. 21:1124-1126.
46. Popp, M.P., J.D. Johnson and M.S. Lesney. 1995. Characterization of the induced response of slash pine to inoculation with bark beetle vectored fungi. Tree Physiol. 15:619-623.
47. Raffa, K.F. and A.A. Berryman. 1982. Physiological differences between lodgepole pines resistant and susceptible to the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Environ. Entomol. 11:486-492.
48. Raffa, K.F. and A.A. Berryman. 1983. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 53:27-49.
49. Raffa, K.F., B.H. Aukema, B.J. Bentz, A.L. Carroll, J.A. Hicke, M.G. Turner and W.H. Romme. 2008. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplifcation: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. BioScience 58:501-517. (Pubitemid 351881194)
50. Reid, R.W., H.S. Whitney and J.A. Watson. 1967. Reactions of lodgepole pine to attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue stain fungi. Can. J. Bot. 45:1115-1126.
51. Ruel, J.J., M.P. Ayres and P.L. Lorio, Jr. 1998. Loblolly pine responds to mechanical wounding with increased resin fow. Can. J. For. Res. 28:596-601.
52. Sánchez-Martínez, G. and M.R. Wagner. 2002. Bark beetle community structure under four ponderosa pine forest stand conditions in northern Arizona. For. Ecol. Manage. 170:145-160. (Pubitemid 35211584)
53. SAS Institute Inc. 2008. JMP-IN Version 8.0, Statistical analysis software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
54. Schmid, J.M. and S.A. Mata. 1992. Stand density and mountain pine beetle-caused tree mortality in ponderosa pine stands. Research Note, RM-515. USDA Forest Service.
55. Six, D.L. 2003. A comparison of mycangial and phoretic fungi of individual mountain pine beetles. Can. J. For. Res. 33:1331-1334. (Pubitemid 350154555)
56. Six, D.L. and M.J. Wingfeld. 2011. The role of phytopathogenicity in bark beetle-fungus symbioses: a challenge to the classic paradigm. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56:255-72 [online version available 3 September 2010].
57. Smith, R.H. 1972. Xylem resin in the resistance of the pinaceae to bark beetles. Pac. Southwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Berkeley, CA. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-1.
58. Stamp, N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypothesis. Q. Rev. Biol. 78:23-55. (Pubitemid 36302677)
59. Strom, B.L., R.A. Goyer, L.L. Ingram, Jr, G.D.L. Boyd and L.H. Lott. 2002. Oleoresin characteristics of progeny of loblolly pines that escaped attack by the southern pine beetle. For. Ecol. Manage. 15 8 :169-178. (Pubitemid 34243774)
60. Thatcher, R.C., J.L. Searcy, J.E. Coster and G.D. Hertel (eds.) 1980. The southern pine beetle. Technical Bulletin 131. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA, 266 p.
61. Wallin, K.F. and K.F. Raffa. 2001. Effects of folivory on subcortical plant defenses: can defense theories predict interguild processes? Ecology 82:1387-1400. (Pubitemid 32532630)
62. Wallin, K.F., T.E. Kolb, K.R. Skov and M.R. Wagner. 2003. Effects of crown scorch on ponderosa pine resistance to bark beetles in northern Arizona. Environ. Entomol. 32:652-661. (Pubitemid 36821581)
63. Wallin, K.F., T.E. Kolb, K.R. Skov and M.R. Wagner. 2004. 7-year results of thinning and burning restoration treatments on old ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson Natural Area. Restor. Ecol. 12:239-247. (Pubitemid 38804398)
64. Wallin, K.F., T.E. Kolb, K.R. Skov and M.R. Wagner. 2008. Forest management treatments, tree resistance, and bark beetle resource utilization in ponderosa pine forests of northern Arizona. For. Ecol. Manage. 255:3263-3269.
65. Western Regional Climate Data Center. 2008. Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary (www.wrcc.dri.edu.)
66. Whitney, H.S. 1971. Association of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) with blue stain fungi and yeasts during brood development in lodgepole pine. Can. Entomol. 103: 1495-1503.
67. Williams, K.K., J.D. McMillin, T.E. DeGomez, K.M. Clancy and A. Miller. 2008. Infuence of elevation on bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) community structure and fight periodicity in ponderosa pine forests of Arizona. Environ. Entomol. 37:94-109. (Pubitemid 351300698)
68. Wood, D.L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27:411-446.
69. Zausen, G.L., T.E. Kolb, J.D. Bailey and M.R. Wagner. 2005. Long-term impacts of stand management on ponderosa pine physiology and bark beetle abundance in northern Arizona: a replicated landscape study. For. Ecol. Manage. 218:291-305. (Pubitemid 41433421)