Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 121-125

  Baccetti, Tiziano ^a,b   De Clerck, H J ^c,d   Cevidanes, L H ^c   Franchi, L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d Private Practice   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DETERMINATION; ARTICLE; BONE PLATE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ETHMOID BONE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRONTAL BONE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; NASAL BONE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; SELLA TURCICA; SPHENOID;

AGE DETERMINATION BY SKELETON; BONE PLATES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ETHMOID BONE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRONTAL BONE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; SELLA TURCICA; SPHENOID BONE;

EID: 79956076490     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq170     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alarashi M, Franchi L, Marinelli A, Defraia E 2003 Morphometric analysis of the transverse dentoskeletal features of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthodontist 73: 21-25. (Pubitemid 38968917)
2. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J A Jr 1999 Thin-plate spline analysis of treatment effects of rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy in early Class III malocclusion. European Journal of Orthodontics 21: 275-281.
3. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J A Jr 2005 The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Seminar in Orthodontics 11: 119-129. (Pubitemid 41245351)
4. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J A Jr 2007 Growth in the untreated Class III subject. Seminars in Orthodontics 13: 130-142.
5. Bookstein F L 1982 On the cephalometrics of skeletal change. American Journal of Orthodontics 82: 177-182.
6. Bookstein F L 1991 Morphometrics tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 20-124.
7. Cevidanes L H, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J A Jr, De Clerck H J 2010 Comparison of 2 protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors and face mask with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthodontist 80: 799-806.
8. Cevidanes L H, Oliveira A E, Motta A, Phillips C, Burke B, Tyndall D 2009 Head orientation in CBCT-generated cephalograms. Angle Orthodontist 79: 971-977.
9. Chang H P, Lin H C, Liu P H, Chang C H 2005 Geometric morphometric assessment of treatment effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin cup appliance on the maxillofacial complex. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32: 720-728. (Pubitemid 41391229)
10. De Clerck H J, Cevidanes L H, Baccetti T 2010 Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study on consecutively treated Class III patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 138: 577-581.
11. De Clerck H J, Cornelis M A, Cevidanes L H, Heymann G C, Tulloch C J 2009 Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 67: 2123-2129.
12. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, Iplikcioglu H 2003 Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 123: 571-577. (Pubitemid 36875896)
13. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara J A Jr 2001 Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular growth. Angle Orthodontist 71: 83-92.
14. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Stahl F, McNamara J A Jr 2007 Thin-plate spline analysis of craniofacial growth in Class I and Class II subjects. Angle Orthodontist 77: 595-601.
15. Hong H, Ngan P, Han G, Qi L G, Wei S H 2005 Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report. Angle Orthodontist 75: 453-460. (Pubitemid 40627505)
16. Kircelli B H, Pektas Z O 2008 Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 133: 440-449.
17. Ludlow J B, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A 2009 Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 136: 312.e1-312.e10.
18. Lux C J, Rubel J, Starke J, Conradt C, Stellzig P A, Komposch P G 2001 Effects of early activator treatment in patients with Class II malocclusion evaluated by thin-plate spline analysis. Angle Orthodontist 71: 120-126. (Pubitemid 33682427)
19. McIntyre G T, Mossey P A 2003 Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics. European Journal of Orthodontics 25: 231-242. (Pubitemid 41296526)
20. Moyers R E, Bookstein F L 1979 The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. American Journal of Orthodontics 75: 599-617. (Pubitemid 10208701)
21. Moyers R E, Bookstein F L, Guire K E 1979 The concept of pattern in craniofacial growth. American Journal of Orthodontics 76: 136-148. (Pubitemid 10204259)
22. Rohlf F J, Slice D E 1990 Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
23. Singer S L, Henry P J, Rosenberg I 2000 Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report. Angle Orthodontist 70: 253-262.
24. Singh G D, McNamara J A Jr, Lozanoff S 1997 Spline analysis of the mandible in subjects with Class III malocclusion. Archives Oral Biology 42: 345-353. (Pubitemid 27294032)