The effects of increasing swelling and anionic charges on the enzymatic hydrolysis of organosolv-pretreated softwoods at low enzyme loadings

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 108, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1549-1558

  del Rio, Luis F ^a   Chandra, Richard P ^a   Saddler, John N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cellulase; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Ethanol; Lignin; Organosolv; Refining; Sulfonation

Indexed keywords

ANIONIC CHARGE; BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; CELLULASE; CRYSTALLINITIES; ENZYME LOADING; FREE ENZYME; LODGEPOLE PINE; MECHANICAL TREATMENTS; NON-SPECIFIC BINDING; ORGANOSOLV;

ETHANOL; LIGNIN; REFINING; SUBSTRATES; SULFONATION;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

ALCOHOL; CELLULASE; LIGNIN;

ARTICLE; HYDROLYSIS; HYDROPHILICITY; ORGANOSOLV TECHNIQUE; PARTICLE SIZE; PINE; PULPING; REACTION ANALYSIS; SULFONATION; WOOD;

CELLULOSE; ENZYMES; HYDROLYSIS; PINUS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; WOOD;

PINUS CONTORTA;

EID: 79956069409     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.23090     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arantes V, Saddler JN. 2010. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: The role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels 3: 4.
2. Beatson RP, Heitner C, Atack D. 1984. Factors affecting the sulphonation of spruce. J Pulp Paper Sci 10: 12-17.
3. Bendzalova M, Pekarovicova A, Kokta BV, Chen R. 1996. Accessibility of swollen cellulosic fibres. Cell Chem Technol 30: 19-32.
4. Berlin A, Balakshin M, Gilkes N, Kadla J, Maximenko V, Kubo S, Saddler JN. 2006. Inhibition of cellulase xylanase and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. J Biotechnol 125: 198-209.
5. Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, Berlin A, Pan X, Saddler JN. 2007. Substrate pretreatment: The key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108: 67-93.
6. Chandra R, Ewanick S, Hsieh C, Saddler JN. 2008. The characterization of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates prior to enzymatic hydrolysis part1: A modified Simons' staining technique. Biotech Prog 24: 1178-1185.
7. Cullis IF, Saddler JN, Mansfield SD. 2004. Effect of initial moisture content and chip size on the bioconversion efficiency of softwood lignocellulosics. Biotechnol Bioeng 85: 413-421.
8. De Vries BJM, Van Vuuren DP, Hoogwijk MM. 2007. Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach. Energy Policy 35: 2590-2610.
9. Del Rio LF, Chandra RP, Saddler JN. 2010. The effects of varying organosolv pretreatment chemicals on the physicochemical properties and cellulolytic hydrolysis of mountain pine beetle-killed Lodgepole pine. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161: 1-21.
10. Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2002. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59: 618-628.
11. Ghose TK. 1987. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59: 257-268.
12. Hui JPM, Lanthier P, White TC, McHugh SG, Yaguchi M, Royb R, Thibaulta P. 2001. Characterization of cellobiohydrolase I (Cel 7a) glycoforms from extracts of Trichoderma reesei using capillary isoelectric focusing and electrospray mass spectrometry. J Chromatography B 752: 349-368.
13. Jayme G. 1944. Mikro-quellungsmessungen an zellstoffen. Der Papier-Fabrikant/Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation 6: 187-194.
14. Jeihanipour A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ. 2010. Enhancement of ethanol and biogas production from high-crystalline cellulose by different modes of NMO pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 105: 469-476.
15. Jeoh T, Ishizawa CI, Davis MF, Himmel ME. 2007. Cellulase digestibility of pretreated biomass is limited by cellulose accessibility. Biotechnol Bioeng 98: 112-122.
16. Katz S, Beatson RP, Scallan AM. 1984. The determination of strong and weak acidic groups in sulfite pulps. Svensk Papperstidn 6: 48-52.
17. Kristensen JB, Felby C, Jørgensen H. 2009. Yield-determining factors in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels 2: 11.
18. Laine C, Wang X, Tenkanen M, Varhimo A. 2004. Changes in the fibre wall during refining of bleached pine kraft pulp. Holzforschung 58: 233-240.
19. Lindstrøm T, Carlsson G. 1980. The effect of chemical environment on fibre swelling. Svensk Papperstidn 7: 14-20.
20. Luo X, Zhu JY. 2011. Effects of drying-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Enzyme Microb Technol 48: 92-99.
21. Mooney CA, Mansfield SD, Touhy MG, Saddler JN. 1998. The effect of initial pore volume and lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods. Biores Technol 64: 113-119.
22. Nakagame S, Chandra RP, Kadla JF, Saddler JN. 2011. Enhancing the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by increasing the carboxylic acid content of the associated lignin. Biotechnol Bioeng 108: 538-548.
23. Nikhil CB, Pazsner L. 1989. Topochemistry of softwood delignification by alkali earth metal salt organosolv pulping. Holzforschung 43: 159-168.
24. Palonen H, Viikari L. 2004. Role of oxidative enzymatic treatments on enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood. Biotechnol Bioeng 86: 550-557.
25. Pan X, Xie D, Yu RW, Lam D, Saddler JN. 2007. Pretreatment of Lodgepole pine killed by mountain pine beetle using the ethanol organosolv process: Fractionation and process optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res 46: 2609-2617.
26. Pan X, Xie D, Yu RW, Saddler JN. 2008. The bioconversion of mountain pine beetle killed Lodgepole pine to fuel ethanol using the organosolv process. Biotechnol Bioeng 101: 39-48.
27. Robertson G, Olson J, Allen P, Chan B, Seth R. 1999. Measurement of fibre length, coarseness, and shape with the fibre quality analyzer. Tappi J 82: 93-98.
28. Sannigrahi S, Ragauskas AJ, Miller SJ. 2010. Lignin structural modifications resulting from ethanol organosolv pretreatment of loblolly pine. Energy Fuels 24: 683-689.
29. Sewalt VJH, Glasser WG, Beachemin KA. 1997. Lignin impact on fiber degradation 3. Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by additives. J Agric Food Chem 45: 1823-1828.
30. Sjöström E. 1993. Wood chemistry: Fundamentals and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
31. Starcher B. 2001. A ninhydrin-based assay to quantitate the total protein content of tissue samples. Anal Biochem 292: 125-129.
32. Suurnäkki A, Heijnesson A, Buchert J, Tenkanen MM, Viikari L, Westermark U. 1996. Location of xylanase and mannanase action in kraft fibres. J Pulp Paper Sci 22: 78-83.
33. Várnai A, Siika-aho M, Viikari L. 2010. Restriction of the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce by lignin and hemicellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 46: 185-193.
34. Wang GS, Pan XJ, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Rockwood D. 2009. Sulfite pretreatment to overcome recalcitrance of lignocellulose (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of hardwoods. Biotechnol Prog 25: 1086-1093.
35. Wingren A, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2003. Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnol Progress 19: 1109-1117.
36. Wood TM, Bhat M. 1988. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO, editors. Methods in enzymology, Vol. 160 Biomass (Part a, Cellulose and Hemicellulose). New York: Academic Press, Inc. p 87-112.
37. Wyman CE. 1999. Biomass ethanol: Technical progress, opportunities, and commercial challenges. Annu Rev Energy Environ 24: 189-226.
38. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. 2004. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88: 797-824.
39. Zhang M, Xu Y, Li K. 2007. Removal of residual lignin of ethanol-based organosolv pulp by an alkali extraction process. J App Pol Sci 106: 630-636.