Evaluation of airway equipment: Man or manikin?

Anaesthesia

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 529-

  Cook, T M ^a   Howes, B ^b   Wharton, N ^b  

^a ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY DYNAMICS; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; LETTER; NONHUMAN; PATIENT SAFETY; RESPIRATORY TRACT INTUBATION;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; MANIKINS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 79956064778     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06726.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Rai MR, Popat MT,. Evaluation of airway equipment: man or manikin? Anaesthesia 2010; 66: 1-3.
2. Howes BW, Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Cook TM,. LMA Supreme insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 343-7.
3. Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Gabbott D, Haslam GM, Cook TM,. I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 991-5.
4. Jackson KM, Cook TM,. A comparison of four different advanced airway mannequins for SAD insertion. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 388-93.
5. Mihai R, Blair E, Kay H, Cook TM,. A quantitative review and meta-analysis of performance of non standard laryngoscopes and rigid fibreoptic intubation aids. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 745-60. (Pubitemid 351814237)