Geothermal assessment of the deep aquifers of the northwestern part of the Bohemian Cretaceous basin, Czech Republic

Geothermics

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 112-124

  Jiráková, Hana ^a,b,c   Procházka, Martin ^d   Dědeček, Petr ^e   Kobr, Miroslav ^a   Hrkal, Zbyněk ^a,f   Huneau, Frédéric ^b   Le Coustumer, Philippe ^b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c Geomedia Ltd   (Czech Republic)

^d AQUATEST   (Czech Republic)

^e INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^f T G MASARYK WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Geothermal gradients; Groundwater; Heat flux; Thermal conductivity; Thermometry; Well logging

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER SYSTEMS; CZECH REPUBLIC; DRAINAGE AREA; DRINKING WATER; GEOTHERMAL GRADIENTS; HEAT FLUX DISTRIBUTIONS; HEAT TRANSFER MODELLING; IN-SITU TEMPERATURE; LITHOLOGICAL VARIABILITY; THERMAL FIELD; THERMAL WATERS; THERMOMETRY; TWENTIETH CENTURY; VERTICAL FLOWS;

AQUIFERS; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROGEOLOGY; LITHOLOGY; POTABLE WATER; RATING; TECTONICS; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; WELL LOGGING;

HEAT FLUX;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AQUIFER; CRETACEOUS; GEOTHERMAL GRADIENT; GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HEAT FLUX; HEAT TRANSFER; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; INFILTRATION; LITHOLOGY; TEMPERATURE GRADIENT; THERMAL WATER; TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECT;

BOHEMIAN BASIN; CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 79956026204     PISSN: 03756505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2011.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Beck A.E. Climatically perturbed temperature gradients and their effect on regional and continental heat-flow means. Tectonophysics 1977, 41:17-39.
2. Beck A.E. Precision logging of temperature gradients and the extraction of past climate. Tectonophysics 1982, 83(1-2):1-11.
3. Bense V.F., Person M.A., Chaudhary K., You Y., Cremer N., Simon S. Thermal anomalies indicate preferential flow along faults in unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers. Geophysical Research Letters 2008, 35:L24406.
4. Bertani R. World geothermal generation in the period 2001-2005. Geothermics 2005, 34(6):651-690.
5. Čermák V. Combined heat flow and heat generation measurements in the Bohemian massif. Geothermics 1975, 4:1-4.
6. Čermák, V., 1979. Geothermal studies and heat-flow map of Czechoslovakia. In: Geodynamic Investigation in Czechoslovakia. Veda, Bratislava, pp. 129-130.
7. Čermák V. Heat flow investigation in Czechoslovakia. Geophysical Synthesis in Czechoslovakia 1981, 427-439. Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, Slovakia. A. Zátopek (Ed.).
8. Čermák V., Šafanda J. Subsurface temperature distribution in Western Czechoslovakia and its mapping for appraising the exploitable resources of geothermal energy. Geothermics and Geothermal Energy 1982, 6-270. E. Schweitzerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany. V. Čermák, R. Haenel (Eds.).
9. Čermák V., Jetel J. Heat flow and ground water movement in the Bohemian Cretaceous basin (Czechoslovakia). Journal of Geodynamics 1985, 4:285-303.
10. Chapellier D. Well Logging in Hydrogeology 1992, A.A. Balkena Publishers, USA.
11. Clauser C., Huenges E. Thermal conductivity of rocks and minerals. Rock Physics and Phase Relations-A Handbook of Physical Constants 1995, vol. 3:105-126. American Geophysical Union Reference Shelf.
12. Clauser C., Villinger H. Analysis of conductive and convective heat transfer in a sedimentary basin, demonstrated for the Rhinegraben. Geophysical Journal International 1990, 100:393-414.
13. Conaway J.G. Deconvolution of temperature gradient logs. Tectonophysics 1977, 103:33-46.
14. Conaway J.G., Beck A.E. Continuous logging of temperature gradients. Tectonophysics 1977, 41:1-17.
15. Datel J.V., Kobr M., Procházka M. Well logging methods in groundwater surveys of complicated aquifer systems: Bohemian Cretaceous basin. Environmental Geology 2009, 57:1021-1034.
16. Demetrescu C., Wilhelm H., Ene M., Andreescu M., Polonic G., Baumann C., Dobricǎ V., Şerban D.Z. On the geothermal regime of the foreland of the Eastern Carpathians bend. Journal of Geodynamics 2005, 39(1):29-50.
17. Dowgiallo J. The Sudetic geothermal region of Poland. Geothermics 2002, 31:343-359.
18. Geissler W.H., Kämpf H., Kind R., Bräuer K., Klinge K., Plenefish T., Horálek J., Zedník J., Nehybka V. Seismic structure and location of a CO2 source in the upper mantle of the western Eger (Ohře) rift, central Europe. Tectonics 2005, 24:1-23. TC5001.
19. Grinbaum, I.I., 1962. Geophysical Methods for Identification of Filtration Characteristics in a Rock Massif. Nedra, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).
20. Herčík, F., Hermann, Z., Valečka, J., 1999. Hydrogeology of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin, Czech Geological Survey. Prague, Czech Republic, 116 pp. (in Czech).
21. Hooijkaas G.R., Genter A., Dezayes C. Deep-seated geology of the granite intrusions at the Soultz EGS site based on data from 5km-deep boreholes. Geothermics 2006, 35(5-6):484-506.
22. Hurter S., Schellschmidt R. Atlas of geothermal resources in Europe. Geothermics 2003, 32:779-787.
23. Jiráková H., Huneau F., Hrkal Z., Celle-Jeanton H., Le Coustumer P. Carbon isotopes to constrain the origin and circulation pattern of groundwater in the north-western part of the Bohemian Cretaceous basin (Czech Republic). Applied Geochemistry 2010, 25:1265-1279.
24. Kelly W.E., Mareš S. Applied Geophysics in Hydrogeological and Engineering Practice 1993, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
25. Klein V. The basement composition and morphology of the Cretaceous basin on the west from Hradce Králové. Věstník Ústředního Ústavu Geologického 1979, 53:357-366.
26. Kobr M., Mareš S., Paillet F. Geophysical well logging. Hydrogeophysics 2005, 291-331. Springer, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Y. Rubin, S. Hubbard (Eds.).
27. Kobranova V.N. Petrophysics 1986, Nedra, Moscow, Russia, 392 pp. (in Russian).
28. Kubik J. Subsurface temperature field of the Bohemian massif. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 1990, 34(2):110-128.
29. Lubis R.F., Sakura Y., Delinom R. Groundwater recharge and discharge processes in the Jakarta groundwater basin, Indonesia. Hydrogeology Journal 2008, 16:927-938.
30. Lund J.W., Freeston D.H., Boyd T.L. Direct application of geothermal energy: 2005 worldwide review. Geothermics 2005, 34:691-727.
31. Majorowicz J., Šafanda J. Heat flow variation with depth in Poland: evidence from equilibrium temperature logs in 2.9-km-deep well Torun-1. International Journal of Earth Sciences 2008, 19(2):307-315.
32. Mansure A.J., Reiter M. A vertical groundwater movement correction for heat flow. Journal of Geophysical Research 1979, 84(B7):3490-3496.
33. Mareš S., Zbořil A., Kelly W.E. Logging for determination of aquifer hydraulic properties. The Log Analyst 1994, 35(6):28-36.
34. Myslil V., Stibitz M., Frydrych V. Geothermal energy potential of Czech Republic. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress 2005, 1-7.
35. Němeček, J., Horák, J., Svoboda, M., Urbánek, P., 1991. Hydraulic model of strážský block. Final report, Stavební geologie Aquatest. Prague, Czech Republic, 60 pp. (in Czech).
36. Němeček, J., Horák, J., Urbánek, P., 1992. The effect of uranium exploitation on surface and subsurface water circulation. Final report, Stavební geologie Aquatest. Prague. Czech Republic, 65 pp. (in Czech).
37. Ollinger D., Baujard C., Kohl T., Moeck I. Distribution of thermal conductivities in the Groß Schönebeck (Germany) test site based on 3D inversion of deep borehole data. Geothermics 2010, 39(1):46-58.
38. Onuoha K.M., Ekine A.S. Subsurface temperature variations and heat flow in the Anambra Basin, Nigeria. Journal of African Earth Sciences 1999, 26(3):641-652.
39. Popov Y., Tertychnyi, Romushkevich R., Korobkov D., Pohl J. Interrelations between thermal conductivity and other physical properties of rocks: experimental data. Pure Applied Geophysics 2003, 160:1137-1161.
40. Procházka, M., 2004. Controls of technical conditions of old monitoring wells in the frame of reconstruction of monitoring wells state network. AQUATEST a.s., Prague, Czech Republic (in Czech).
41. Procházka, M., 2008. Control of new monitoring wells in the frame of reconstruction of state network of monitoring wells. AQUATEST a.s., Prague, Czech Republic (in Czech).
42. Serban D.Z., Nielsen S.B., Demetrescu C. Transylvanian heat flow in the presence of topography, paleoclimate and groundwater flow. Tectonophysics 2001, 335:331-344.
43. Šafanda, J., Dědeček, P., Krešl, M., Čermák, V., 2007. Report from the Exploration of the Geothermal Borehole GTPVLT-1 in Litoměřice. Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, 67 pp. (in Czech).
44. Šafanda J. Some remarks on the estimation of geothermal topocorrections. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 1987, 31:284-300.
45. Šafanda J. Effects of topography and climatic changes on the temperature in the borehole GFU-1, Prague. Tectonophysics 1994, 239:187-197.
46. Štulc, P., 1994. Convective Heat Transfer in the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 107 pp. (in Czech).
47. Štulc P. Combined effect of topography and hydrogeology on subsurface temperature-implications for aquifer permeability and heat flow. A study from the Bohemian Cretaceous basin. Tectonophysics 1998, 284:161-174.
48. Štulc P., Stoje V., Kopecký P. Dynamics of the subsurface temperature field caused by mining-related groundwater management. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 2000, 44(3):442-459.
49. Vasseur G., Demongodin L. Convective and conductive heat transfer in sedimentary basins. Basin Research 1995, 7(1):67-79.