Reproducibility of the CMAP scan

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 433-437

  Maathuis, Ellen M ^a   Drenthen, Judith ^a   Visser, Gerhard H ^a   Blok, Joleen H ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CMAP scan; Reproducibility; Stimulus response curve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVATION; CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DEMYELINATING POLYNEUROPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPOUND MUSCLE ACTION POTENTIAL SCAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME; HUMAN; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY; MOTOR UNIT POTENTIAL; MUSCLE FIBER MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; MUSCLE REINNERVATION; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RECRUITMENT, NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79956022093     PISSN: 10506411     EISSN: 18735711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307-310.
2. Blok J.H., Ruitenberg A., Maathuis E.M., Visser G.H. The electrophysiological muscle scan. Muscle Nerve 2007, 36:436-446.
3. Brismar T. Changes in electrical threshold in human peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol Sci 1985, 68:215-223.
4. Doherty T.J., Brown W.F. The estimated numbers and relative sizes of thenar motor units as selected by multiple point stimulation in young and older adults. Muscle Nerve 1993, 16:355-366.
5. Drenthen J., Maathuis E.M., Ruts L., van Doorn P.A., Blok J.H., Visser G.H. Serial CMAP scan analysis in Guillain-Barre patients. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2008, 13:167.
6. Ginanneschi F., Mondelli M., Dominici F., Rossi A. Changes in motor axon recruitment in the median nerve in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:2467-2472.
7. Henderson R.D., Ridall G.R., Pettitt A.N., McCombe P.A., Daube J.R. The stimulus-response curve and motor unit variability in normal subjects and subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 2006, 34:34-43.
8. Kohara N., Kimura J., Kaji R., Goto Y., Ishii J., Takiguchi M., et al. Nerve conduction study in diabetic polyneuropathy: multicenter analysis on intertrial variability. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 50:534-540.
9. Kong X., Lesser E.A., Megerian J.T., Gozani S.N. Repeatability of nerve conduction measurements using automation. J Clin Monit Comput 2006, 20:405-410.
10. Meulstee J., Darbas A., van Doorn P.A., van Briemen L., Van der Meche F.G. Decreased electrical excitability of peripheral nerves in demyelinating polyneuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997, 62:398-400.
11. Pinheiro D.S., Manzano G.M., Nobrega J.A. Reproducibility in nerve conduction studies and F-wave analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:2070-2073.
12. Visser G.H., Blok J.H. The CMAP scan. Motor unit number estimation (MUNE) and quantitative EMG. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 60:65-77.