An analysis of perspectives in interactive settings

SOMA 2010 - Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 44-52

  Nguyen, Dong ^a   Mayfield, Elijah ^a   Rosé, Carolyn P ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Ideology; Perspective; Political discourse; Sentiment analysis; Social media

Indexed keywords

IDEOLOGY; PERSPECTIVE; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EXPERIMENTS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 79956012381     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1964858.1964865     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. R. Agrawal, S. Rajagopalan, R. Srikant, and Y. Xu. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In WWW '03: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 529-535, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.
2. Alias-i. lingpipe-3.9.0, http://alias-i.com/lingpipe.
3. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:993-1022, 2003.
4. D. L. Cloud. Flying while arab: The clash of civilizations and the rhetoric of racial profiling in the american empire. Terrorism: Communication and Rhetorical Perspectives, 2008.
5. M. Jiang and S. Argamon. Political leaning categorization by exploring subjectivities in political blogs. In In Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Data Mining, pages 647-653, 2008.
6. F. M. Kawakib Momani, Muhammad A. Badarneh. Intertextual borrowings in ideologically competing discourses: The case of the middle east. Journal of Intercultural Communication, (22), 2010.
7. D. Kellner. Bushspeak and the politics of lying: Presidential rhetoric in the "war on terror.". Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2007.
8. R. Kipling. The white man's burden. McClure's Magazine, 1899.
9. J. Kristeva. The Kristeva reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
10. M. Laver, K. Benoit, and T. College. Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 2003.
11. W.-H. Lin and A. Hauptmann. Are these documents written from different perspectives?: a test of different perspectives based on statistical distribution divergence. In ACL-44: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1057-1064, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. W.-H. Lin, E. Xing, and A. Hauptmann. A joint topic and perspective model for ideological discourse. In ECML PKDD '08: Proceedings of the European conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - Part II, pages 17-32, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.
13. R. Malouf and T. Mullen. Graph-based user classification for informal online political discourse. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web, 2007.
14. G. M. Maney, L. M. Woehrle, and P. G. McCoy. Ideological consistency and contextual adaptation: U.s. peace movement emotional work before and after 9/11. American Behavioral Scientist, 2009.
15. G. M. M. Patrick, G. McCoy, Lynne M. Woehrle. Discursive legacies: The u.s. peace movement and "support the troops". Social Problems, 2008.
16. M. Paul and R. Girju. Cross-cultural analysis of blogs and forums with mixed-collection topic models. In EMNLP '09: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1408-1417, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2009. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. H. W. Simons. From post-9/11 melodrama to quagmire in iraq: A rhetorical history. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 2007.
18. M. Thomas, B. Pang, and L. Lee. Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In EMNLP '06: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 327-335, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. P. Treeratpituk and J. Callan. Automatically labeling hierarchical clusters. In dg.o '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Digital government research, pages 167-176, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. (Pubitemid 46967015)
20. T. A. van Dijk. Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse and society, 6(2):243-289, 1995.
21. T. A. van Dijk. Ideology and discourse: a multidisciplinary introduction. 2003.
22. B. Yu, S. Kaufmann, and D. Diermeier. Exploring the characteristics of opinion expressions for political opinion classification. In dg.o '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research, pages 82-91. Digital Government Society of North America, 2008.
23. C. Zhai, A. Velivelli, and B. Yu. A cross-collection mixture model for comparative text mining. In KDD '04: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 743-748, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. (Pubitemid 40115001)