Inviability of a DNA2 deletion mutant is due to the DNA damage checkpoint

Cell Cycle

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1690-1698

  Budd, Martin E ^a   Antoshechkin, Igor A ^a   Reis, Clara ^a,b   Wold, Barbara J ^a   Campbell, Judith L ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO GULBENKIAN DE CIÊNCIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

DNA replication; Exo1; Okazaki fragment processing; RAD27; RAD53; RAD9; Yeast

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DNA2 PROTEIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; OKAZAKI FRAGMENT; PROTEIN; PROTEIN RAD9; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE DELETION; LETHALITY; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; YEAST;

EID: 79955999320     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.10.15643     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Mallory JC, Petes TD. Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:13749-54.
2. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996; 271:314-5.
3. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, et al. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 1999; 286:1166-71.
4. Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. DUNI encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell 1993; 75:1119-27.
5. Herzberg K, Bashkirov VI, Rolfsmeier M, Haghnazari E, McDonald WH, Anderson S, et al. Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8 and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:8396-409. (Pubitemid 44748573)
6. Santocanale C, Diffley JF. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 1998; 395:615-8. (Pubitemid 28475717)
7. Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, Zubko M, Morrice N, Lydall D. Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO Journal 2008; 27:2400-10.
8. Genschel J, Bazemore LR, Modrich P. Human exonuclease I is required for 5′ and 3′ mismatch repair. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:13302-11. (Pubitemid 34952702)
9. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008; 455:770-4.
10. Maringele L, Lydall D. EXO1-dependent single-stranded DNA at telomeres activates subsets of DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways in budding yeast yku70Delta mutants. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1919-33. (Pubitemid 34832921)
11. Bertuch AA, Lundblad V. EXO1 contributes to telomere maintenance in both telomerase-proficient and telomerase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2004; 166:1651-9.
12. Schurer KA, Rudolph C, Ulrich HD, Kramer W. Yeast MPH1 gene functions in an error-free DNA damage bypass pathway that requires genes from homologous recombination, but not from postreplicative repair. Genetics 2004; 166:1673-86. (Pubitemid 38621051)
13. Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, Hu F, Werler PJH, Boussett K, et al. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activiate Rad53. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:958-65. (Pubitemid 34428740)
14. Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Sun Z, Morrow JS, Pradhan D, Stern DF. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell 2002; 9:1055-65. (Pubitemid 34626674)
15. Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J 1998; 17:5679-88. (Pubitemid 28445979)
16. Weinert TA, Hartwell TA. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1988; 241:317-22.
17. Sun ZHJ, Fay DS, Stern DF. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosporylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 1998; 281:272-4. (Pubitemid 28334513)
18. Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol Cell 2001; 8:129-36. (Pubitemid 32772911)
19. Surana U, Amon A, Dowzer C, McGrew J, Byers B, Nasmyth K. Destruction of the CDC28/CLB mitotic kinase is not required for the metaphase to anaphase transition in budding yeast. EMBO J 1993; 12:1969-78. (Pubitemid 23157713)
20. Agarwal RTZ, Yu H, Cohen-Fix O. Two distinct pathways for inhibiting pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:45027-33. (Pubitemid 37377263)
21. Tercero JA, Diffley JF. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 2001; 412:553-7. (Pubitemid 32743835)
22. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioloi A, Liberi G, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M, et al. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 2001; 412:557-61. (Pubitemid 32743836)
23. Lucca C, Vanoli F, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Haber J, et al. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 2004; 23:1206-13. (Pubitemid 38297174)
24. Aboussekhra AVJ, Morrison DE, de la Torre-Ruiz MA, Cernakova L, Fabre F, Lowndes NF. A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J 1996; 15:3912-22. (Pubitemid 26289801)
25. Gambus A, Jones RC, Sanchez-Diaz A, Kanemaki M, van Deursen F, Edmondson RD, et al. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:358-66.
26. Lou H, Komata M, Katou Y, Guan Z, Reis CC, Budd M, et al. Mrc1 and DNA polymerase epsilon function together in linking DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint. Mol Cell 2008; 32:106-17.
27. Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, Ashikari T, et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 2003; 424:1078-83. (Pubitemid 37064311)
28. Szyjka SJ, Viggiani CJ, Aparicio OM. Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2005; 19:691-7. (Pubitemid 41219444)
29. Naylor MLLJ, Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. Mrc1 phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress is required for Mec1 accumulation at the stalled fork. PNAS 2009; 106:12765-70.
30. Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 2003; 17:1755-67. (Pubitemid 36870338)
31. Budd ME, Campbell JL. Identification of a new yeast DNA polymerase of the DNA polymerase β family and evidence supporting a role in meiosis. J Biol Chem 1995.
32. Budd ME, Choe WC, Campbell JL. The nuclease activity of the yeast Dna2 protein, which is related to the RecB-like nucleases, is essential in vivo. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:16518-29. (Pubitemid 30398875)
33. Bae SH, Choi E, Lee K, Park J, Lee S, Seo Y. Dna2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae possesses a single-stranded DNA-specific endonuclease activity that is able to act on double-stranded DNA in the presence of ATP. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:26880-90.
34. Bae SH, Seo YS. Characterization of the enzymatic properties of the yeast Dna2 helicase/endonuclease suggests a new model for Okazaki fragment processing. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:38022-31.
35. Budd ME, Choe WC, Campbell JL. DNA2 encodes a DNA helicase essential for replication of eukaryotic chromosomes. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:26766-9.
36. Masuda-Sasa T, Polaczek P, Campbell JL. Single strand annealing and ATP-independent strand exchange activities of yeast and human DNA2: possible role in Okazaki fragment maturation. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:38555-64. (Pubitemid 46041980)
37. Kuo C, Nuang H, Campbell JL. Isolation of yeast DNA replication mutants in permeabilized cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80:6465-9. (Pubitemid 14238602)
38. Budd ME, Campbell JL. A yeast gene required for DNA replication encodes a protein with homology to DNA helicases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:7642-6.
39. Waga S, Bauer G, Stillman B. Reconstitution of complete SV40 DNA replication with purified replication factors. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:10923-34. (Pubitemid 24198307)
40. Johnson RE, Gopala KK, Prakash L, Prakash S. Requirement for the yeast RTH1 5′ to 3′ exonuclease for the stability of simple repetitive DNA. Science 1995; 269:238-40.
41. Chen C, Kolodner RD. Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat Genet 1999; 23:81-5. (Pubitemid 29418793)
42. Budd ME, Campbell JL. A yeast replicative helicase, Dna2 helicase, interacts with yeast FEN-1 nuclease in carrying out its essential function. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2136-42. (Pubitemid 27133299)
43. Bae KH, Kim HS, Bae SH, Kang HY, Brill S, Seo YS. Bimodal interaction between replication-protein A and Dna2 is critical for Dna2 function both in vivo and in vitro. Nucl Acids Res 2003; 31:3006-15. (Pubitemid 37441758)
44. Bae SH, Bae KH, Kim JA, Seo YS. RPA governs endonuclease switching during processing of Okazaki fragments in eukaryotes. Nature 2001; 412:456-61.
45. Ayyagari R, Gomes XV, Gordenin DA, Burgers PMJ. Okazaki fragment maturation in yeast. I. Distribution of functions between Fen1 and Dna2. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:1618-25.
46. Kao HI, Veeraraghavan J, Polaczek P, Campbell JL, Bambara RA. On the roles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dna2p and FEN1 in Okazaki fragment processing. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:15014-24. (Pubitemid 38618894)
47. Tishkoff DX, Filosi N, Gaida GM, Kolodner RD. A novel mutation avoidance mechanism dependent on Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD27 is distinct from DNA mismatch repair. Cell 1997; 88:253-63. (Pubitemid 28015874)
48. Tong AHY, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, Page N, et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 2001; 294:2364-8. (Pubitemid 33140562)
49. Tong AHY, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, Xin X, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 2004; 303:808-13. (Pubitemid 38174652)
50. Budd ME, Tong AH, Polaczek P, Peng X, Boone C, Campbell JL. A Network of Multi-Tasking Proteins at the DNA Replication Fork Preserves Genome Stability. PLoS Genet 2005; 1:634-50.
51. Loeillet S, Palancade B, Cartron M, Thierry A, Fichard GF, Dujon B, et al. Genetic network interactions among replication repair and nuclear pore deficiencies in yeast. DNA Repair 2005; 4:459-68. (Pubitemid 40267704)
52. Budd ME, Reis CC, Smith S, Myung K, Campbell JL. Evidence suggesting that Pif1 helicase functions in DNA replication with the Dna2 helicase/nuclease and DNA polymerase delta. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:2490-500.
53. Blankley RTLD. A domain of Rad9 specifically required for activation of Chk1 in budding yeast. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:601-8.
54. Lancelot NCG, Couprie J, Duband-Goulet I, Alpha-Bazin B, Quemeneur E, Ma E, et al. The checkpoint Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 protein contains a tandem tufor domain that recognizes DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:5898-912. (Pubitemid 47506304)
55. Soulier JLN. The BRCT domain of the S. cerevisiae checkpoint protein Rad9 mediates a Rad9-Rad9 interaction after DNA damage. Curr Biol 1999; 9:551-4.
56. Li JWSVW, Schultz LD, George HA, Herber WK, Chae HJ, Bentley WE, Rao G. Green Fluorescent Protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: real-time studies of the GAL1 Promoter. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000; 70:187-96.
57. Budd ME, Campbell JL. A yeast replicative helicase, Dna2 helicase, interacts with yeast FEN-1 nuclease in carrying out its essential function. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2136-42. (Pubitemid 27133299)
58. Imamura O, Campbell JL. The human Bloom syndrome gene suppresses the DNA replication and repair defects of yeast dna2 mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:8193-8. (Pubitemid 36842521)
59. Sharma S, Sommers JA, Wu L, Bohr VA, Hickson ID, Brosh RM Jr. Stimulation of flap endonuclease-1 by the Bloom's syndrome protein. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:9847-56. (Pubitemid 38372583)
60. Budd ME, Tong AH, Polaczek P, Peng X, Boone C, Campbell JL. A network of multi-tasking proteins at the DNA replication fork preserves genome stability. PLoS Genet 2005; 1:61.
61. Kang YH, Kang MJ, Kim JH, Lee CH, Cho IT, Hurwitz J, et al. The MPH1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae functions in Okazaki fragment processing. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:10376-86.
62. + reveal that Dna2 plays an essential role in Okazaki fragment metabolism. Genetics 2000; 155:1055-67.
63. Boule JB, Vega LR, Zakian VA. The yeast Pif1p helicase removes telomerase from telomeric DNA. Nature 2005; 438:57-61. (Pubitemid 41599817)
64. Boule JB. The yeast Pif1 DNA helicase preferentially unwinds RNA DNA substrates. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:5809-18.
65. Johansson E, Garg P, Burgers PMJ. The Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerase δ contains separable domains for processive replication and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) binding. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:1907-15. (Pubitemid 38084461)
66. Zieler HA WM, Berg P. Suppression of Mutations in Two Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genes by the Adenovirus E1A Protein. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:3227-37.
67. Fiorentino DF, Crabtree GR. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae dna2 mutants suggests a role for the helicase late in S phase. Mol Biol Cell 1997; 8:2519-37.
68. Formosa T, Nitiss T. Dna2 mutants reveal interactions with DNA polymerase alpha and Ctf4, a Pol α accessory factor and show that full DNA2 helicase activity is not essential for growth. Genetics 1999; 151:1459-70. (Pubitemid 29177555)
69. Das-Bradoo SNH, Wood JL, Ricke RM, Haworth JC, Bielinsky AK. Defects in DNA ligase 1 trigger PCNA ubiquitylation at Lys 107. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:74-9.
70. Watanabe KMJ, Umezu K, Shirahige K, Maki H. Involvement of RAD9-Dependent Damage Checkpoint Control in Arrest of Cell Cycle, Induction of Cell Death and Chromosome Instability Caused by Defects in Origin Recognition Complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryotic Cell 2002; 1:200-12. (Pubitemid 36562397)
71. 2/M arrest. Mol Cell 2001; 7:293-300.
72. Vaze MB, Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Ira G, Liberi G, Arbel-Eden A, et al. Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell 2002; 10:373-85. (Pubitemid 35007351)
73. Bielinsky AK, Gerbi SA. Chromosomal ARS1 has a single leading strand start site. Mol Cell 1999; 3:477-86. (Pubitemid 29292604)
74. Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shi EY, Lee SE, Ira G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-Strand break ends. Cell 2008; 134:981-94.
75. Budd ME, Cox Ls, Campbell JL. Coordination of Nucleases and Helicases during DNA Replication and Double-strand Break Repair. In: Cox LS, ed. Molecular Themes in DNA Replication. London: RSC Publishing 2009.
76. Cejka P, Cannavo E, Polaczek P, Masuda-Sasa T, Pokharel S, Campbell JL, et al. DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature 2010; 467:112-6.
77. Fiorentini P, Huang KN, Tishkoff DX, Kolodner RD, Symington LS. Exonuclease I of Sacchromyces cerevisiae functions in mitotic recombination in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2764-73.
78. Tishkoff DX, Boerger AL, Bertrand P, Filosi N, Gaida GM, Kane MF, et al. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, a gene encoding an exonuclease that interacts with MSH2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:7487-92.
79. Bertuch AA, Lundblad V. EXO1 contributes to telomere maintenance in both telomerase-proficient and telomerase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2004; 166:1651-9.
80. Garvik BCM, Hartweill L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:6128-38.
81. Booth CGE, Brady G, Lydall D. Quantitatve amplifiation of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:4414-22. (Pubitemid 33064782)
82. Zubko MK, Guillard S, Lydall D. Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 2004; 168:103-15.
83. Jia X, Weinert T, Lydall D. Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 2004; 166:753-64.
84. Segurado M, Diffley JF. Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1816-27. (Pubitemid 351915506)
85. Cotta-Ramusino C, Fachinetti D, Lucca C, Doksani Y, Lopes M, Sogo J, et al. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol Cell 2005; 17:153-9. (Pubitemid 40075374)
86. Lazzaro FSV, Granata M, Pellicioli A, Vaze M, Haber JE, Plevani P, et al. Histone metyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO J 2008; 27:1502-12. (Pubitemid 351733336)
87. Garvik B, Carson M, Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint [published erratum appears in Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:457]. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:6128-38.
88. Nusbaum C, Ohsumi TK, Gomez J, Aquadro J, Victor TC, Warren RM, et al. Sensitive, specific polymorphism discovery in bacteria using massively parallel sequencing. Nat Methods 2009; 6:67-9.
89. Rossi ML, Bambara RA. Reconstituted Okazaki fragment processing indicates two pathways of primer removal. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:26051-61. (Pubitemid 44401811)
90. Rossi ML, Pike JE, Wang W, Burgers PM, Campbell JL, Bambara R. Pif1 helicase directs eukaryotic Okazaki fragments toward the two-nuclease cleavage pathway for primer removal. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:27483-93.
91. Pike JE, Burgers PM, Campbell JL, Bambara RA. Pif1 helicase lengthens some Okazaki fragment flaps necessitating Dna2 nuclease/helicase action in the two-nuclease processing pathway. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:25170-80.
92. Rossi ML, Pike JE, Wang W, Burgers PM, Campbell JL, Bambara RA. Pif1 helicase directs eukaryotic Okazaki fragments toward the two-nuclease cleavage pathway for primer removal. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:27483-93.
93. Stewart JA, Miller AS, Campbell JL, Bambara RA. Dynamic removal of replication protein A by Dna2 facilitates primer cleavage during Okazaki fragment processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:31356-65.