A Turkish version of Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (TR-MIDAS): Reliability-validity assesment

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 115-123

  Uysal, Hilal ^a   Ozcan, Şeyda ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Disease specific quality of life; MIDAS; Myocardial infarction; Reliability; TR MIDAS; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION DIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VALIDITY;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TURKEY;

EID: 79955981756     PISSN: 14745151     EISSN: 18731953     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Onat A., Hergenc G., Sansoy V., Soydan İ., Can G., Unal Tuna N.E., Arslan P. TEKHARF solution to heart health secret for Turkish People, contribution to universal medicine. Argos/cortex communication services, Istanbul 2007, 22-29. A. Onat (Ed.).
2. Kultursay H. Coronary heart disease. Primary and secondary protection: introduction and epidemiology. Argos communication services Ads. Tic. A.Ş. Istanbul 2001, 3.
3. NSW Department of Health NSW Chronic Care Program rehabilitation for chronic disease implementing (2) 2006.
4. Thompson D.R., Jenkinson C., Roebuck A., Lewin R.J.P., Boyle R.M., Chandola T. Development and validation of short measure of health status for individuals with acute myocardial infarction: the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS). Qual Life Res 2002, 11:535-543.
5. Oksuz E., Malhan S. Health-centric living quality, calimetry 2005, 1-105. Bilkent University, Ankara.
6. Roebuck A., Furze G., Thompson D.R. Health-related quality of life after myocardial infarction: an interview study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2001, 34(6):787-794. Blackwell Science Ltd.
7. Dougherty C.M., Dewhurst T., Nichol W.P., Spertus J. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in Stable Angina Pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51(7):569-575.
8. Smith H.J., Taylor R., Mitchell A. A comparison of four quality of life instruments in cardiac patients: SF-36, QLI, QLMI and SEIQoL. Heart 2000, 84:390-394.
9. Uneri O., Cakin Memik N. Living quality concept in children and review of quality of life scales. Child Adolesc Ment Health J 2007, 4(1):48-56.
10. Wang W., Lopez V., Thompson D.R. A Chinese Mandarin translation and validation of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS). Qual Life Res 2006, 15(7):1243-1249.
11. Eser E. Cultural adaptation of SYK scales. 1. Life Quality in Health Symposium, Izmir 2004.
12. Maneesriwongul W., Dixon J.K. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs 2004, 48(2):175-186.
13. Bek N., Simsek E., Erel S., Yakut Y., Uygur F. Turkish version of impact on family scale: a study of reliability and validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009, 7:4.
14. Erefe İ. Research in Nursery, Principle, Process and Methods. The features of data collecting tools. HEMAR-G publish Number: 1, Odak Offset, Istanbul 2002, 169-188.
15. Yurdagul H. Utilization of content validity indexes in scale improvement studies. XIV.National Education Sciences Congress, Pamukkale University Faculty of Education, Denizli 2005.
16. Arslan S. Attitude scale regarding computer aided education. Yuzuncu yil Univ. Fac Educ J 2006, 3(2):24-33.
17. Akgül A., Çevik O. Techniques of statistical analysis. Management administration applications in SPSS 2003, 417. Emek Offset, Ankara.
18. Gozum S., Aksayan S. A guide for trans-cultural scale adaptation II. Psychometric characteristics and cross-cultural comparisons. Turk J Nurs Res 2003, 5(1):3-14.
19. Gliem J.A., Gliem R.R. Calculating, interpreting and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. 2003 Midwest research to practice conference in adult, continuing and community education 2003, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
20. Şimşek Ö.F. Introduction to structural equation modelling: basic principles and LISREL applications 2007, Ekinoks.
21. Babadag K. Ethic in Nursery. Nursery Bulletin, Istanbul University Florence Nightingale Nursery High-school Publish Organ 1991, 5(19):5. I.U. Printing House and Film Center, Istanbul.
22. Tavşancil E. Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS 2005, 16-51. Nobel Company, Ankara. Second edition.
23. Field A. Research methods II: factor analysis on SPSS 2005.
24. Habing B. Exploratory factor analysis 2003, University of South Carolina.
25. Yu D.S., Thompson D.R., Yu C.M., Olridge N.B. Assessing HRQL among Chinese Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Angina, myocardial infarction and heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2009, 24(131(3)):384-394.
26. Karagoz Y., Kosterelioglu İ. Developing the communication skills evaluation scale through factor analysis method. Dumlupinar Univ Soc Sc J 2008, 21.
27. Akgul A., Cevik O. Statistical analysis, management administration applications in SPSS 2005, 440. Ankara. Second edition.
28. Ercan İ., Kan İ. Reliability and validity at the scales. Uludag Univ Fac Med J 2004, 30(3):211-216.
29. Costa Santos C., Costa Pereira A., Bernardes J. Agreement studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: inappropriateness, controversies and consequences. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 112(5):667-669.