A comparison of comorbidities obtained from hospital administrative data and medical charts in older patients with pneumonia

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Chong, Wai Fung ^a   Ding, Yew Yoong ^b   Heng, Bee Hoon ^a  

^a NATIONAL HEALTHCARE GROUP   (Singapore)

^b TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PNEUMONIA; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGAPORE; STATISTICS;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMORBIDITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PNEUMONIA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGAPORE;

EID: 79955978295     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-105     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. The interaction between age and comorbidity contributes to predicting the mortality of geriatric patients in the acute-care hospital. RA Incalzi O Capparella A Gemma F Landi E Bruno F Di Meo P Carbonin, J Intern Med 1997 242 291 298 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00132.x 9366807 (Pubitemid 27475601)
2. Development and validation of a risk-adjustment index for older patients: the high-risk diagnoses for the elderly scale. MM Desai ST Bogardus Jr CS Williams G Vitagliano SK Inouye, J Am Geriatr Soc 2002 50 474 481 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50113.x 11943043 (Pubitemid 34229403)
3. The importance of comorbidities in explaining differences in patient costs. M Shwartz LI Iezzoni MA Moskowitz AS Ash E Sawitz, Med Care 1996 34 767 782 10.1097/00005650-199608000-00005 8709659 (Pubitemid 126433270)
4. Flaws in mortality data. The hazards of ignoring comorbid disease. S Greenfield HU Aronow RM Elashoff D Watanabe, Jama 1988 260 2253 2255 10.1001/jama.260.15.2253 3172404
5. Comorbidity and physical function: results from the aging and longevity study in the Sirente geographic area (ilSIRENTE study). M Cesari G Onder A Russo V Zamboni C Barillaro L Ferrucci M Pahor R Bernabei F Landi, Gerontology 2006 52 24 32 10.1159/000089822 16439821 (Pubitemid 43162717)
6. Impact of comorbidity on survival after surgical resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. RJ Battafarano JF Piccirillo BF Meyers HS Hsu TJ Guthrie JD Cooper GA Patterson, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002 123 280 287 10.1067/mtc.2002.119338 11828287 (Pubitemid 34127115)
7. The impact of comorbidity on the survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. SF Hall PA Groome D Rothwell, Head Neck 2000 22 317 322 10.1002/1097-0347(200007)22:4<317::AID-HED13.0.CO;2-0 10862012 (Pubitemid 30413294)
8. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. R Gijsen N Hoeymans FG Schellevis D Ruwaard WA Satariano GA van den Bos, J Clin Epidemiol 2001 54 661 674 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00363-2 11438406 (Pubitemid 32594852)
9. Use of risk adjustment in setting budgets and measuring performance in primary care II: advantages, disadvantages, and practicalities. A Majeed AB Bindman JP Weiner, Bmj 2001 323 607 610 10.1136/bmj.323.7313.607 11557710 (Pubitemid 32846130)
10. Risk adjustment in claims-based research: the search for efficient approaches. LL Roos SM Sharp MM Cohen A Wajda, J Clin Epidemiol 1989 42 1193 1206 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90118-2 2585010 (Pubitemid 20018458)
11. Selecting a patient characteristics index for the prediction of medical outcomes using administrative claims data. C Melfi E Holleman D Arthur B Katz, J Clin Epidemiol 1995 48 917 926 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00202-2 7782800
12. Use of insurance claims databases to evaluate the outcomes of ophthalmic surgery. AL Coleman H Morgenstern, Surv Ophthalmol 1997 42 271 278 10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00095-7 9406373 (Pubitemid 27509831)
13. The economic burden of congestive heart failure in a managed care population. J Xuan PT Duong PA Russo MJ Lacey B Wong, Am J Manag Care 2000 6 693 700 10977478 (Pubitemid 30433239)
14. Risk adjustment in outcome assessment: the Charlson comorbidity index. W D'Hoore C Sicotte C Tilquin, Methods Inf Med 1993 32 382 387 8295545 (Pubitemid 24001924)
15. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. PS Romano LL Roos JG Jollis, J Clin Epidemiol 1993 46 1075 1079 discussion 1081-1090 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8 8410092
16. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. ME Charlson P Pompei KL Ales CR MacKenzie, J Chronic Dis 1987 40 373 383 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 3558716 (Pubitemid 17055592)
17. Using administrative data to describe casemix: a comparison with the medical record. DJ Malenka D McLerran N Roos ES Fisher JE Wennberg, J Clin Epidemiol 1994 47 1027 1032 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90118-X 7730905 (Pubitemid 24268912)
18. Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality? LI Iezzoni SM Foley J Daley J Hughes ES Fisher T Heeren, Jama 1992 267 2197 2203 10.1001/jama.267.16.2197 1556797
19. Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgery. GA Hawker PC Coyte JG Wright JE Paul C Bombardier, J Clin Epidemiol 1997 50 265 273 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00368-X 9120525 (Pubitemid 27165703)
20. A comparison of the Charlson comorbidity index derived from medical record data and administrative billing data. SM Kieszak WD Flanders AS Kosinski CC Shipp H Karp, J Clin Epidemiol 1999 52 137 142 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00154-1 10201654 (Pubitemid 29118363)
21. Accuracy of administrative data to assess comorbidity in patients with heart disease. an Australian perspective. H Powell LL Lim RF Heller, J Clin Epidemiol 2001 54 687 693 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00364-4 11438409 (Pubitemid 32594854)
22. Lack of association between patients' measured burden of disease and risk for hospital readmission. K Waite E Oddone M Weinberger G Samsa M Foy W Henderson, J Clin Epidemiol 1994 47 1229 1236 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90127-9 7722558 (Pubitemid 24361530)
23. Development and validation of a claims based index for adjusting for risk of mortality: the case of acute myocardial infarction. SL Normand CN Morris KS Fung BJ McNeil AM Epstein, J Clin Epidemiol 1995 48 229 243 10.1016/0895- 4356(94)00126-B 7869069
24. A comparison of administrative versus clinical data: coronary artery bypass surgery as an example. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team. PS Romano LL Roos HS Luft JG Jollis K Doliszny, J Clin Epidemiol 1994 47 249 260 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90006-X 8138835 (Pubitemid 24109737)
25. Co-morbidity data in outcomes research: are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review? KH Humphries JM Rankin RG Carere CE Buller FM Kiely JJ Spinelli, J Clin Epidemiol 2000 53 343 349 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00188-2 10785564 (Pubitemid 30216472)
26. Quality of health care. Part 4: The origins of the quality-of-care debate. D Blumenthal, N Engl J Med 1996 335 1146 1149 10.1056/ NEJM199610103351511 8813048
27. How well does routine hospitalisation data capture information on comorbidity in New Zealand? D Sarfati S Hill G Purdie E Dennett T Blakely, N Z Med J 123 50 61
28. Hospital chart review provided more accurate comorbidity information than data from a general practitioner survey or an administrative database. DB Preen CD Holman DM Lawrence NJ Baynham JB Semmens, J Clin Epidemiol 2004 57 1295 1304 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.016 15617956 (Pubitemid 40023150)
29. Comorbidity measurement in elderly female breast cancer patients with administrative and medical records data. CJ Newschaffer TL Bush LT Penberthy, J Clin Epidemiol 1997 50 725 733 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00050-4 9250271 (Pubitemid 27341823)
30. Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications? EP McCarthy LI Iezzoni RB Davis RH Palmer M Cahalane MB Hamel K Mukamal RS Phillips DT Davies Jr, Med Care 2000 38 868 876 10.1097/00005650- 200008000-00010 10929998
31. Validation of diagnostic codes within medical services claims. M Wilchesky RM Tamblyn A Huang, J Clin Epidemiol 2004 57 131 141 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00246-4 15125622 (Pubitemid 38668607)
32. Risk adjustment for older hospitalized persons: a comparison of two methods of data collection for the Charlson index. C van Doorn ST Bogardus CS Williams J Concato VR Towle SK Inouye, J Clin Epidemiol 2001 54 694 701 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00367-X 11438410 (Pubitemid 32594855)
33. Comorbidity information in older patients at an emergency visit: self-report vs. administrative data had poor agreement but similar predictive validity. SR Susser J McCusker E Belzile, J Clin Epidemiol 2008 61 511 515 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.009 18394546
34. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. A Elixhauser C Steiner DR Harris RM Coffey, Med Care 1998 36 8 27 10.1097/00005650-199801000- 00004 9431328 (Pubitemid 128456396)
35. BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Thorax 2001 56 Suppl 4 V1 64 11713364
36. The measurement of interrater agreement. JL Fleiss, Statistical methods for rates and proportions New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, Fleiss JL, 2 1981 212 236
37. S Rabe-Hesketh A Skrondal, Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata College Station, TX: Stata Press Second 2008
38. Administrative data for public health surveillance and planning. BA Virnig M McBean, Annu Rev Public Health 2001 22 213 230 10.1146/annurev. publhealth.22.1.213 11274519 (Pubitemid 32452505)
39. Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data. H Quan GA Parsons WA Ghali, Med Care 2002 40 675 685 10.1097/00005650-200208000-00007 12187181
40. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. H Quan B Li LD Saunders GA Parsons CI Nilsson A Alibhai WA Ghali, Health Serv Res 2008 43 1424 1441 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00822.x 18756617 (Pubitemid 352019142)
41. Predictions of hospital mortality rates: a comparison of data sources. M Pine M Norusis B Jones GE Rosenthal, Ann Intern Med 1997 126 347 354 9054278 (Pubitemid 27102518)
42. Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. WR Best SF Khuri M Phelan K Hur WG Henderson JG Demakis J Daley, J Am Coll Surg 2002 194 257 266 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01183-8 11893128
43. Mortality after noncardiac surgery: prediction from administrative versus clinical data. HS Gordon ML Johnson NP Wray NJ Petersen WG Henderson SF Khuri JM Geraci, Med Care 2005 43 159 167 10.1097/00005650-200502000-00009 15655429 (Pubitemid 40222634)
44. Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough? EL Hannan MJ Racz JG Jollis ED Peterson, Health Serv Res 1997 31 659 678 9018210 (Pubitemid 27053527)
45. Can cardiovascular clinical characteristics be identified and outcome models be developed from an in-patient claims database? WS Weintraub C Deaton L Shaw E Mahoney DC Morris C Saunders D Canup S Connolly S Culler ER Becker A Kosinski SJ Boccuzzi, Am J Cardiol 1999 84 166 169 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00228-3 10426334 (Pubitemid 29331333)
46. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California. JP Parker Z Li CL Damberg B Danielsen DM Carlisle, Med Care 2006 44 687 695 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215815.70506. b6 16799364 (Pubitemid 44284283)
47. Case-mix adjustment using administrative databases: a paradigm to guide future research. NP Wray JC Hollingsworth NJ Peterson CM Ashton, Med Care Res Rev 1997 54 326 356 10.1177/107755879705400306 9437171 (Pubitemid 127467062)
48. The case for case-mix adjustment in practice profiling. When good apples look bad. S Salem-Schatz G Moore M Rucker SD Pearson, Jama 1994 272 871 874 10.1001/jama.272.11.871 8078165
49. Failure of ICD-9-CM codes to identify patients with comorbid chronic kidney disease in diabetes. EF Kern M Maney DR Miller CL Tseng A Tiwari M Rajan D Aron L Pogach, Health Serv Res 2006 41 564 580 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00482. x 16584465 (Pubitemid 43374287)
50. Validity of hospital discharge International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying patients with hyponatremia. KL Movig HG Leufkens AW Lenderink AC Egberts, J Clin Epidemiol 2003 56 530 535 10.1016/S0895-4356(03) 00006-4 12873647 (Pubitemid 36842910)