The effects of age and interaural delay on detecting a change in interaural correlation: The role of temporal jitter

Hearing Research

Volumn 275, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 139-149

  Wang, Mengyuan ^a   Wu, Xihong ^a   Li, Liang ^a   Schneider, Bruce A ^b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EAR; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79955971106     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alain C., McDonald K.L. Age-related differences in neuromagnetic brain activity underlying concurrent sound perception. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(6):1308-1314.
2. Alain C., Ogawa K.H., Woods D.L. Aging and the segregation of auditory stimulus sequences. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 1996, 51B(2):P91-P93.
3. Akeroyd M.A., Summerfield A.Q. A binaural analog of gap detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 104:2807-2820.
4. American National Standard Specification for Audiometers S3.6-2004 2004, ANSI-S3.6.
5. Bernstein L.R., Trahiotis C., Akeroyd M.A., et al. Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109:1604-1615.
6. Blauert J., Lindemann W. Spatial-mapping of intracranial auditory events for various degrees of interaural coherence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1986, 79:806-813.
7. Bregman A.S. Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Carlyon R.P., Cusack R., Foxton J.M., Robertson I.H. Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2001, 27:115-127.
9. Daneman M., Carpenter P.A. Individual differences in working memory and reading. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 1980, 19:450-466.
10. Durlach N.I. Binaural signal detection: equalization and cancellation theory. Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory 1972, vol. 2:371-462. Academic Press, New York. J.V. Tobias (Ed.).
11. Eddins D.A., Hall J.W. Binaural processing and auditory asymmetries. Springer handbook of auditory research: The aging auditory system: Perceptual characterization and neural basis of presbycusis 2010, 135-166. Springer, New York. S. Gordon-Salant, R.D. Frisina, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
12. Grose J.H., Mamo S.K. Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age. Ear Hear 2010, 31(5):755-760.
13. Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1988, vol. 22:193-225. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. G.H. Bower (Ed.).
14. Haas H. On the influence of a single echo on the intelligibility of speech. Acustica 1951, 1:49-58.
15. Heinrich A., Schneider B.A. Elucidating the effects of aging on remembering perceptually distorted word pairs. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2010, iFirst, 05, August, 2010. 10.1080/17470218.2010.492621.
16. Heinrich A., Schneider B.A., Craik F.I.M. Investigating the influence of continuous babble on auditory short-term memory performance. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2008, 61(5):735-751.
17. Huang Y., Huang Q., Chen X., Qu T.S., Wu X.H., Li L. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults. Hear. Res. 2008, 244:51-65.
18. Huang Y., Wu X.H., Li L. Detection of the break in interaural correlation is affected by interaural delay, aging and center frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 126:300-309.
19. Humes L.E., Lee J.H., Coughlin M.P. Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120:2926-2937.
20. Li L., Huang J., Wu X., Qi J.G., Schneider B.A. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the correlation between two sounds. Ear Hear 2009, 30:273-286.
21. Li L., Daneman M., Qi J., Schneider B.A. Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perfrom 2004, 30:1077-1091.
22. Li L., Qi J.G., Yu H., Alain C., Schneider B.A. Attribute capture in the precedence effect for long-duration noise sounds. Hear. Res. 2005, 202:235-247.
23. Litovsky R.Y., Shinn-Cunningham B.G. Investigation of the relationship among three common measures of precedence: fusion, localization dominance, and discrimination suppression. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109:346-358.
24. Litovsky R.Y., Colburn H.S., Yost W.A., Guzman S.J. The precedence effect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 106:1633-1654.
25. MacDonald E., Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A. Effects of speech intelligibility of temporal jittering and spectral smearing of the high-frequency components of speech. Hear. Res. 2010, 261:63-66.
26. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Plack C.J., et al. The shape of the ear's temporal window. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988, 83:1102-1116.
27. Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A. Masking-level differences in the elderly: a comparison of antiphasic and time-delay methods with burst and with continuous masking noise. J. Speech Hear. Res. 1991, 34:1410-1422.
28. Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A. The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and elderly listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 91:2129-2135.
29. Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A. Masking-level differences in the elderly: the effect of the level of the masking noise. Percept. Psychophys 1998, 60:1197-1205.
30. Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A., MacDonald E., Pass H.E., Brown S. Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: a simulation of auditory aging. Hear. Res. 2007, 223(1-2):114-121.
31. Rakerd B., Hartmann W.M., Hsu J. Echo suppression in the horizontal and median sagittal planes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 107:1061-1064.
32. Schmiedt R.A. The physiology of cochlear presbycusis. Springer handbook of auditory research: The aging auditory system: Perceptual characterization and neural basis of presbycusis 2010, 9-38. Springer, New York. S. Gordon-Salant, R.D. Frisina, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
33. Schneider B.A., Pichora-Fuller M.K. Age-related changes in temporal processing: Implications for speech perception. Seminars Hear 2001, 22:227-239.
34. Schneider B.A., Pichora-Fuller M.K., Daneman M. The effects of senescent changes in audition and cognition on spoken language comprehension. Springer handbook of auditory research: The aging auditory system: Perceptual characterization and neural basis of presbycusis 2010, 167-210. Springer, New York. S. Gordon-Salant, R.D. Frisina, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
35. Schneider B.A., Zurek P.M. Lateralization of coherent and incoherent targets added to a diotic background. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 86:1756-1763.
36. Snyder J.S., Alain C. Age-related changes in neural activity associated with concurrent vowel segregation. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 24:492-499.
37. 0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res. 2007, 50:1139-1156.
38. Wagener K.C., Brand T. Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters. Int. J. Audiol. 2005, 44:144-156.
39. Wallach H., Newman E.B., Rosenzweig M.R. The precedence effect in sound localization. Am. J. Psychol. 1949, 62:315-336.
40. Zurek P.M. The precedence effect. Directional Hearing 1987, 85-105. Springer-Verlag, New York. W. A.Yost, G. Gourevitch (Eds.).