Interaction weaknesses of personal navigation devices

AutomotiveUI 2010 - 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 129-136

  Hipp, Markus ^a   Schaub, Florian ^a   Kargl, Frank ^b   Weber, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

HCI; Personal navigation devices (PND); Study

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE NAVIGATION SYSTEM; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; HCI; MARKET SEGMENT; MULTIPLE INTERACTIONS; NAVIGATION DEVICES; PERSONAL NAVIGATION; STUDY; TESTED DEVICES;

NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES;

NAVIGATION;

EID: 79955962490     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1969773.1969796     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. *. Journal of the ACM, 32(3):505-536, 1985. (Pubitemid 15507408)
2. E. W. Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1:269-271, 1959.
3. B. J. Fogg and H. Tseng. The elements of computer credibility. In CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 80-87, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM.
4. R. J. Hanowski, S. C. Kantowitz, and B. H. Kantowitz. Driver acceptance of unreliable route guidance information. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, volume 2 of System Development, pages 1062-1066, 1994.
5. A. Malm. Personal navigation devices (3rd edt). Market report, Berg Insight, November 2009. http://www.berginsight.com/ShowReport.aspx?id=92.
6. The Local. Driver obeys car navigation literally, promptly crashes. http://www.thelocal.de/society/20100423-26745.html, 23 April 2010.
7. The Times. Sat-nav dunks dozy drivers in deep water. http://www. timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article707216.ece, 20 April 2006.