Dynamic spectrum sharing with multiple primary and secondary users

IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1756-1765

  Lin, Peng ^a   Jia, Juncheng ^b   Zhang, Qian ^a   Hamdi, Mounir ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Distributed algorithms; dynamic spectrum sharing; Nash equilibrium (NE); noncooperative game

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED ALGORITHM; DYNAMIC SPECTRUM SHARING; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; NASH EQUILIBRIUM (NE); NASH EQUILIBRIUM POINT; NONCOOPERATIVE GAME; PROPORTIONAL ALLOCATION; SERVICE SATISFACTION; SIMULATION RESULT; SPECTRUM DEMAND; SPECTRUM SHARING; SPECTRUM USAGE; THEORETIC ANALYSIS; WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS;

COMMERCE; GAME THEORY; PROFITABILITY; QUALITY OF SERVICE; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 79955948542     PISSN: 00189545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2011.2132156     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. I. Akyildiz,W. Lee, M. Vuran, and S.Mohanty, "Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey," Comput. Netw., vol. 50, no. 13, pp. 2127-2159, Sep. 2006. (Pubitemid 43975031)
2. D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
3. V. Rodriguez, K. Moessner, and R. Tafazolli, "Auction driven dynamic spectrum allocation: optimal bidding, pricing and service priorities for multi-rate, multi-class CDMA," in Proc. IEEE PIMRC, Berlin, Germany, 2005, pp. 11-14.
4. D. Niyato and E. Hossain, "A game-theoretic approach to competitive spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks," in Proc. IEEE WCNC, 2007, pp. 16-20. (Pubitemid 350139359)
5. O. Simeone, I. Stanojev, S. Savazzi, Y. Bar-Ness, U. Spagnolini, and R. Pickholtz, "Spectrum leasing to cooperating secondary ad hoc networks," IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 203-213, Jan. 2008.
6. J. Zhang and Q. Zhang, "Stackelberg game for utility-based cooperative cognitive radio networks," in Proc. ACM MobiHoc, 2009, pp. 23-32.
7. D. Niyato and E. Hossain, "Optimal price competition for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio: A dynamic game-theoretic approach," in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, 2007, pp. 4625-4629. (Pubitemid 351259863)
8. S. Sengupta, R. Chandramouli, S. Brahma, and M. Chatterjee, "A game theoretic framework for distributed self-coexistence among IEEE 802.22 networks," in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, 2008, pp. 1-6.
9. Y. Xing, R. Chandramouli, and C. Cordeiro, "Price dynamics in competitive agile spectrum access markets," IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 613-621, Apr. 2007. (Pubitemid 46620955)
10. S. Sengupta, M. Chatterjee, and S. Ganguly, "An economic framework for spectrum allocation and service pricing with competitive wireless service providers," in Proc. IEEE DySPAN, 2007, pp. 89-98. (Pubitemid 47431639)
11. J. Jia and Q. Zhang, "Competitions and dynamics of duopoly wireless service providers in dynamic spectrum market," in Proc. ACM MobiHoc, 2008, pp. 313-322.
12. P. Lin, J. Jia, Q. Zhang, and M. Hamdi, "Dynamic spectrum sharing with multiple primary and secondary users," in Proc. IEEE ICC, 2010, pp. 1-5.
13. H. Xu, J. Jin, and B. Li, "A secondary market for spectrum," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2010, pp. 1-5.
14. X. Zhou and H. Zheng, "TRUST: A general framework for truthful double spectrum auctions," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009, pp. 999-1007.
15. J. Acharya and R. Yates, "Service provider competition and pricing for dynamic spectrum allocation," in Proc. IEEE GameNets, 2009, pp. 190-198.
16. D. Niyato, E. Hossain, and Z. Han, "Dynamics of multiple-seller and multiple-buyer spectrum trading in cognitive radio networks: A gametheoretic modeling approach," IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1009-1022, Aug. 2009.
17. S. Sanghavi and B. Hajek, "Optimal allocation of a divisible good to strategic buyers," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 2004, pp. 2748-2753. (Pubitemid 40287203)
18. R. Johari and J. Tsitsiklis, "Efficiency loss in a network resource allocation game," Math. Oper. Res., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 407-435, Aug. 2004.
19. N. Singh and X. Vives, "Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly," Rand J. Econ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 546-554, 1984.
20. S. Shenker, "Fundamental design issues for the future Internet," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1176-1188, Sep. 1995.
21. P. Dubey and J. Rogawski, Inefficiency of Nash Equilibria. NewHaven, CT: Yale Univ., 1982, ser. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics.
22. C. Papadimitriou, "Algorithms, games, and the Internet," in Proc. 33rd Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput., New York, 2001, pp. 749-753. (Pubitemid 32865793)