Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: Do least-cost models reflect how animals use landscapes?

Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 668-678

  Sawyer, Sarah C ^a   Epps, Clinton W ^b   Brashares, Justin S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal movement; Connectivity; Corridor; Dispersal; Fragmentation; Linkage design; Model validation

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; HABITAT CORRIDOR; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT USE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; MODEL VALIDATION; MOVEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; REMOTE SENSING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHEEP; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA; OVIS ARIES; OVIS CANADENSIS; OVIS CANADENSIS NELSONI;

EID: 79955944454     PISSN: 00218901     EISSN: 13652664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01970.x     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J.P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulinck, H. & Matthysen, E. (2003) The application of 'least-cost' modeling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 233-247.
2. Anderson, J., Rowcliffe, J.M. & Cowlishaw, G. (2007) Does the matrix matter? A forest primate in a complex agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation, 135, 212-222.
3. Banaikashani, R. (1989) A new method for site suitability analysis - the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Environmental Management, 13, 685-693.
4. Beazley, K., Smandych, L., Snaith, T., MacKinnon, F., Austen-Smith Jr, P. & Duinker, P. (2005) Biodiversity considerations in conservation system planning: map-based approach for Nova Scotia, Canada. Ecological Applications, 15, 2192-2208.
5. Beier, P. (1995) Dispersal of juvenile cougars in fragmented habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management, 59, 228-237.
6. Beier, P., Majka, D.R. & Newell, S.L. (2009) Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. Ecological Applications, 19, 2067-2077.
7. Beier, P., Majka, D.R. & Spencer, W.D. (2008) Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conservation Biology, 22, 836-851.
8. Binzenhofer, B., Schroder, B., Strauss, B., Biedermann, R. & Settele, J. (2005) Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths - The example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania. Biological Conservation, 126, 247-259.
9. Briers, R.A. (2002) Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biological Conservation, 103, 77-83.
10. Calabrese, J.M. & Fagan, W.F. (2004) A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics. Frontiers in Ecology and Environmental Science, 2, 529-536.
11. Caroll, C., Zielinski, W.J. & Noss, R.F. (1999) Using presence-absence data to build and test spatial habitat models for the fisher in the Klamath region. Conservation Biology, 13, 1344-1359.
12. Chetkiewicz, C.L.B. & Boyce, M.S. (2009) Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 1036-1047.
13. Chetkiewicz, C.L.B., St. Clair, C.C. & Boyce, M.S. (2006) Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 317-342.
14. Coulon, A., Morellet, N., Goulard, M., Cargnelutti, B., Angibault, J. & Hewison, A.J.M. (2008) Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function. Landscape Ecology, 23, 603-614.
15. Crooks, K.R. & Sanjayan, M. (2006) Connectivity Conservation: maintaining connection for nature. Connectivity Conservation (eds K.R. Crooks & M. Sanjayan ), pp. 1-19. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
16. Cushman, S.A., Chase, M. & Griffin, C. (2010) Mapping landscape resistance to identify corridors and barriers for elephant movement in Southern Africa. Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation (eds S. Cushman & F. Huettman ), pp. 349-367. Springer, New York, USA.
17. Cushman, S.A. & Lewis, J.S. (2010) Movement behaviour explains genetic differentiation in American black bears. Landscape Ecology, 25, 1613-1625.
18. Cushman, S.A., McKelvey, K.S. & Schwartz, M.K. (2008) Use of empirically derived source-destination models to map regional conservation corridors. Conservation Biology, 23, 368-376.
19. DeCesare, N.J. & Pletscher, D.H. (2006) Movements, connectivity, and resource selection of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Journal of Mammalogy, 87, 531-538.
20. Doerr, V., Barrett, T. & Doerr, E. (2011) Connectivity, dispersal behaviour, and conservation under climate change: a response to Hodgson et al.. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 143-147.
21. Driezen, K., Adriaensen, F., Rondinini, C., Doncaster, C.P. & Matthysen, E. (2007) Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Ecological Modeling, 209, 314-322.
22. Epps, C.W., Palsbøll, P.J., Wehausen, J.D., Roderick, G.K., Ramey II, R.R. & McCullough, D.R. (2005) Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep. Ecology Letters, 8, 1029-1038.
23. Epps, C.W., Wehausen, J.D., Bleich, V.C., Torres, S.G. & Brashares, J.S. (2007) Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 714-724.
24. Epps, C.W., Wehausen, J.D., Palsboll, P.J. & McCullough, D.R. (2010) Using genetic tools to track desert bighorn sheep colonizations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 522-531.
25. Fagan, W.F. & Calabrese, J.M. (2006) Quantifying connectivity: balancing metric performance with data requirements. Connectivity Conservation (eds K.R. Crooks & M. Sanjayan ), pp. 297-317. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
26. Graham, C.H. (2001) Factors influencing movement patterns of keel-billed toucans in a fragmented tropical landscape in Southern Mexico. Conservation Biology, 15, 1789-1798.
27. Graves, T.A., Farley, S., Goldstein, M.I. & Servheen, C. (2007) Identification of functional corridors with movement characteristics of brown bears on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Landscape Ecology, 22, 765-772.
28. Hadley, A.S. & Betts, M.G. (2010) Tropical deforestation alters hummingbird movement patterns. Biology Letters, 5, 207-210.
29. Hepcan, S., Hepcan, C.C., Bouwma, I.M., Jongman, R.H.G. & Ozkan, M.B. (2009) Ecological networks as a new approach for nature conservation in Turkey: a case study of Izmir Province. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90, 143-154.
30. Hilty, J.A. & Merenlender, A.M. (2004) Use of riparian corridors and vineyards by mammalian predators in Northern California. Conservation Biology, 18, 126-135.
31. Hodgson, J., Moilanen, A., Wintle, B. & Thomas, C. (2011) Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 148-152.
32. ISI Web of Knowledge (2010) Thomson Reuters.
33. Joly, P., Morand, C. & Cohas, A. (2003) Habitat fragmentation and amphibian conservation: building a tool for assessing landscape matrix connectivity. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 326, S132-S139.
34. Karieva, P. (1987) Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Nature, 326, 388-390.
35. Kautz, R., Kawula, R., Hoctor, T., Comiskey, J., Jansen, D., Jennings, D., Kashbohm, J., Mazzotti, F., McBride, R., Richardson, L. & Root, K. (2006) How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, 130, 118-133.
36. Kindall, J.L. & Van Manen, F.T. (2005) Identifying habitat linkages for American Black Bears in North Carolina, USA. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 487-495.
37. Kong, F., Yin, Y., Nakagoshi, N. & Zong, Y. (2010) Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 16-27.
38. Larkin, J.L., Maehr, D.S., Hoctor, T.S., Orlando, M.A. & Whitney, K. (2004) Landscape linkages and conservation planning for the black bear in west-central Florida. Animal Conservation, 7, 23-34.
39. LaRue, M.A. & Nielsen, C.K. (2008) Modeling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in Midwestern North America using least-cost path methods. Ecological Modeling, 212, 372-381.
40. Laurance, S.G. & Laurance, W.F. (1999) Tropical wildlife corridors: use of linear rainforest remnants by arboreal mammals. Biological Conservation, 91, 231-239.
41. Li, H., Li, D., Li, T., Qiao, Q., Yang, J. & Zhang, H. (2010) Application of least-cost path model to identify a giant panda dispersal corridor network after the Wenchuan earthquake - Case study of Wolong Nature Reserve in China. Ecological Modeling, 221, 944-952.
42. Magle, S.B., Theobald, D.M. & Crooks, K.R. (2009) A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. Landscape Ecology, 24, 267-280.
43. Majka, D., Jenness, J. & Beier, P. (2007) CorridorDesigner: ArcGIS Tools for Designing and Evaluating Corridors [online]. Available at:, accessed 08-Feb-2011.
44. Mayer, K.E. & Laudenslayer Jr, W.F. (1988) A Guide to Wildlife Habitats of California. State of California, Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 166 pp.
45. McLachlan, J.S., Hellmann, J.J. & Schwartz, M.W. (2007) A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology, 21, 297-302.
46. McRae, B.H. & Beier, P. (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19885-19890.
47. McRae, B.H., Dickson, B.G., Keitt, T.H. & Shah, V.B. (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 89, 2712-2724.
48. Meegan, R.P. & Maehr, D.S. (2002) Landscape conservation and regional planning for the Florida panther. Southeastern Naturalist, 1, 217-232.
49. Merriam, C.H. (1897) Ovis nelsoni, a new mountain sheep from the desert region of southern California. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 11, 217-218.
50. Mills, L.S. & Smouse, P.E. (1994) Demographic consequences of inbreeding in remnant populations. American Naturalist, 144, 412-431.
51. Mortelliti, A. & Boitani, L. (2008) Interaction of food resources and landscape structure in determining the probability of patch use by carnivores in fragmented landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 23, 285-298.
52. Osborn, F.V. & Parker, G.E. (2003) Linking two elephant refuges with a corridor in the communal lands of Zimbabwe. African Journal of Ecology, 41, 68-74.
53. Penrod, K.C., Cabanero, C., Beier, P., Luke, C., Spencer, W.D., Rubin, E.S. & Paulman, C. (2008) A Linkage Design for the Joshua Tree - Twenty-nine Palms Connection. South Coast Wildlands, Fair Oaks, CA. Unpublished report, available at:, accessed Feb-2011.
54. Phillips, S.J., Williams, P. & Midgley, G. (2008) Optimizing dispersal corridors for the Cape Proteaceae using network flow. Ecological Applications, 18, 1200-1211.
55. Pinto, N. & Keitt, T.H. (2009) Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach. Landscape Ecology, 24, 253-266.
56. Quinn, J.F. & Harrison, S.P. (1988) Effects of habitat fragmentation and isolation on species richness-evidence from biogeographic patterns. Oecologia, 75, 132-140.
57. Rabinowitz, A. & Zeller, K.A. (2010) A range-wide model of landscape connectivity and conservation for the jaguar, Panthera onca. Biological Conservation, 143, 939-945.
58. Ray, N. (2005) Pathmatrix: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 177-180.
59. Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.J. & Fall, A. (2010) The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landscape Ecology, 25, 519-532.
60. Richard, Y. & Armstrong, D.P. (2010) Cost distance modeling of landscape connectivity and gap-crossing ability using radio-tracking data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 603-610.
61. Rizkalla, C.E. & Swihart, R.K. (2007) Explaining movement decisions of forest rodents in fragmented landscapes. Biological Conservation, 140, 339-348.
62. Rothley, K. (2005) Finding and filling the 'cracks' in resistance surfaces for least-cost modeling. Ecology and Society, 10, 4 [online]. Available at:, accessed Feb-2011.
63. Rouget, M., Cowling, R.M., Lombard, A.T., Knight, A.T. & Graham, I.H.K. (2006) Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conservation Biology, 20, 549-561.
64. Schadt, S., Knauer, F., Kaczensky, P., Revilla, E., Wiegand, T. & Trepl, L. (2002) Rule-based assessment of suitable habitat and patch connectivity for the Eurasian lynx. Ecological Applications, 12, 1469-1483.
65. Shen, G., Feng, C., Xie, Z., Ouyang, Z., Li, J. & Pascal, M. (2008) Proposed conservation landscape for giant pandas in the Minshan Mountains, China. Conservation Biology, 22, 1144-1153.
66. Shrader-Frechette, K. (2004) Measurement problems and Florida panther models. Southeastern Naturalist, 3, 37-50.
67. Singleton, P.H., Gaines, W.L. & Lehmkuhl, J.F. (2004) Landscape permeability for grizzly bear movements in Washington and southwestern British Columbia. Ursus, 15, 90-103.
68. Stevens, V.M., Verkenne, C., Vandewoestijne, S., Wesselingh, R.A. & Baguette, M. (2006) Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad. Molecular Ecology, 15, 2333-2344.
69. Taylor, P.D., Fahrig, M. & With, K.A. (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. Connectivity Conservation (eds K.R. Crooks & M. Sanjayan ), pp. 29-43. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
70. Theobald, D.M. (2006) Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks. Connectivity Conservation (eds K.R. Crooks & M. Sanjayan ), pp. 416-443. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
71. Thomas, C.D., Cameron, A., Green, R.E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L.J., Collingham, Y.C., Erasmus, B.F.N., de Siqueira, M.F., Grainger, A., Hannah, L., Hughes, L., Huntley, B., van Jaarsveld, A.S., Midgley, G.F., Miles, L., Ortega-Huerta, M.A., Peterson, A.T., Phillips, O.L. & Williams, S.E. (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427, 145-148.
72. Uezu, A., Metzger, J.P. & Vielliard, J.M.E. (2005) Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species. Biological Conservation, 123, 507-519.
73. Verbeylen, G., De Bruyn, L., Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. (2003) Does matrix resistance influence red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecology, 18, 791-805.
74. Vignieri, S.N. (2005) Streams over mountains: influence of riparian connectivity on gene flow in the Pacific jumping mouse (Zapus trinotatus). Molecular Ecology, 14, 1925-1937.
75. Wang, I.J., Savage, W.K. & Shaffer, H.B. (2009) Landscape genetics and least-cost path analysis reveal unexpected dispersal routes in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Molecular Ecology, 18, 1365-1374.
76. Wang, Y., Yang, K., Bridgman, C.L. & Lin, L. (2008) Habitat suitability modeling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity. Landscape Ecology, 23, 989-1000.
77. Wikramanayake, E., McKnight, M., Dinerstein, E., Joshi, A., Gurung, B. & Smith, D. (2004) Designing a conservation landscape for tigers in human-dominated environments. Conservation Biology, 18, 839-844.
78. Wilcox, B.A. & Murphy, D.D. (1985) Conservation strategy - the effects of fragmentation on extinction. American Naturalist, 125, 879-887.
79. With, K.A., Gardner, R.H. & Turner, M.G. (1997) Connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos, 78, 151-169.